For multi-tasking it does a bit, which shouldn't really be a surprise. It was a 'real world' test, but even then yes, the difference is pretty insignificant.jiien said:Wait wait, we're talking about CAS latencies, not memory frequency. According to your link, CAS latencies basically mean nothing, even for synthetic benchmarks and non-gaming applications.
Does what really? Dual channel suck versus triple or quad? Well yeah, the bandwidth difference is actually pretty huge. Would that matter for most peoples' usage though? I'd imagine no.Jin34 said:Does it really? Or are you basing that on synthetic benchmarks?
bozeman said:Has anybody had any experience with cyperpowerpc.com? Thinking about ordering a rig from there.
rhfb said:Why go AMD when the 2500k is the current sweet spot when it comes to performance/price ratio? And I'd rather buy from NCIXUS, but that is just me. That build they did for someone a few pages back looked so damn slick.
Raistlin said:For multi-tasking it does a bit, which shouldn't really be a surprise. It was a 'real world' test, but even then yes, the difference is pretty insignificant.
Does what really? Dual channel suck versus triple or quad? Well yeah, the bandwidth difference is actually pretty huge. Would that matter for most peoples' usage though? I'd imagine no.
Regardless for LGA 1155 socket SB's, it looks like 1.5v DDR 3 1600, cas 9 seems like the best band-for-the-buck for 4GB DIMMs?
You can make a great 2500K system for the $1000 the other build cost (the 75 could be the "have someone else build it for me" cost). Then you throw in the overclocking and just general performance of the i5 and the gap gets even wider.Shambles said:I would assume because a SNB system is a substantial increase in price. The 2500K alone is nearly as much as the CPU and MB of the AMD platform. (At least up north here).
bozeman said:I'm limited to sites with the "Bill Me Later" feature. I don't have the money to pay for it all now, but I can over 6 months.
And what is the 2500k? All this computer speak I've been reading over the past few days is making my head spin.
Individual apps? Well yeah there probably aren't many situations a difference would be obvious. Multitasking or high bandwidth work though? It matters then. That's like saying no one needs a 2600k. Does it give you anything beyond a 2500k for games? Not much right now. Multitasking? Then it does.Jin34 said:Just because it has more bandwidth doesn't mean it matters in real world apps.
With today's cards that's not true anymore, though the difference isn't necessarily huge (well x4 could be). When moving up to high resolutions though things start to get hairy. It's kind of annoying intel didn't add more PCI-e lanes to 1155 consider you'll be sharing GPU, USB-3, SATA, etc. on the same bus.Just like when sites ran video cards at x16, x8, x4 and found that there is no statistical diff from x16 to x8 and even x4 wasn't that big of a deal if I remember correctly.
I'm going to give some 1.6v a shot for the hell of it. If it causes issues, I'll return it. Plenty of people have raised the voltage beyond that though so I'm not too worried. GSkill is advertising it as meant for P67. Yeah it's marketing BS to act like it's automatically special in that regard, but such advertising at least results in an expectation of compatibility.As for what ram for SB thats what you want, specially the 1.5v since Sandy Bridge seems touchy about the ram voltage.
Seeing how I'm going 5760 x 1080 (3 x 1080p), you can understand my frustrationscartman414 said:Actually, I've read that you don't need x16/x16 unless you're going dual-monitor.
bozeman said:Has anybody had any experience with cyperpowerpc.com? Thinking about ordering a rig from there.
Build looks much better (to me at least). Should be able to overclock to 4.5Ghz easy too. As for the monitor thing, the video card should come with a DVI -> VGA adapter, and if it doesn't, just spend the $2 to get one from any number of websites. No point in going to buy a new monitor if yours is doing fine.bozeman said:Better???
Of course, the monitor I have only has a VGA input, so now I've got to get one that has an HDMI (or DVI) input. Budget suggestions?
Was this answered?coopolon said:What games were you getting unsatisfactory performance in with the q9550? And with what GPU?bee said:well i did that same upgrade of q9550 to 2500k and sure there are some programs and games that don't benefit at all but for the most part the difference is like night and day, go for it
This is a good, simple way of getting a base idea of what your system is doing.TheExodu5 said:Heh, I was running a 1333fsb CPU on my 1066 board as well.
Sandy Bridge is definitely a great upgrade, but don't expect a big difference in a game like Crysis...that game is most likely bound by your GPU.
If you want to have an idea of how taxing a game is to your CPU, alt-tab and open the task manager in windows (ctrl+shift+esc). Set it to the performance tab. Go play for a bit and then check the performance tab to see how stressed each core was. If no core is getting maxed to 100%, then getting a CPU will not increase performance.
That's really unfortunate as it's likely keeping you from gaining another ~1GHz. P35s and lower-spec P45s are OC killers for quad cores.DarkUSS said:I've already OCed my processor at 3.16Ghz (originally it was 2.83Ghz). The thing is my current motherboard has a native FSB of 1066 while the Q9550 runs at 1333 (when not OCed), consequently 3.16Ghz is the absolute maximum speed I can squeeze out of the CPU with this mobo. I've tried numerous tweaks to go higher to no avail as my system becomes unstable and crashes when running stability software like Prime 95 and Linx.
GPU is a GTX 460 1GB, which I purchased and installed about a month ago. RAM is 4GB DDR2.
As for games other than Crysis, which runs at 35fps but can dip below that frequently, I'm pretty much satisfied with everything else I've tried (L4D2, Mass Effect 2, Singularity and Batman AA, all run at 60fps vsynced most of the time).
To be honest, I'm more concerned about future titles like Crysis 2 and Mass Effect 3 and by the fact that my current mobo doesn't support SLI meaning that I can't throw in another GTX 460 when it becomes necessary.
No doubt there will be difference, though I'm more interested in knowing how better it performs in games and if it worths all the trouble (installing windows afresh etc) and money of course.
How much does a good s775 motherboard cost these days really? I guess if I could find one under 100EUR that allows for further OC of my Q9550 and can accommodate SLI configuration, it would be a reasonable purchase, right?·feist· said:That's really unfortunate as it's likely keeping you from gaining another ~1GHz. P35s and lower-spec P45s are OC killers for quad cores.
Im pretty sure you should stay put for a little long until their is something you want to upgrade for. The q9550 should keep you going for a while longer.DarkUSS said:How much does a good s775 motherboard cost these days really? I guess if I could find one under 100EUR that allows for further OC of my Q9550 and can accommodate SLI configuration, it would be a reasonable purchase, right?
In any case, thanks for the advice feist.
Raistlin said:Interesting
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/memory/2011/01/11/the-best-memory-for-sandy-bridge/1
Seems like that's not entirely the case for non-gaming duties (I'm not building a gaming machine per se), though in reality SB is gimped in general until the 2011 boards hit. Dual channel for the fail![]()
I think you would be better served taking my previous suggestion and adding Windows 7 to the mix. Or at least dial back your current build because I think you might be falling into the 'But it's only $18 extra" trap.bozeman said:Better???
PRICE: (+1143)
Is the side installed on your case or is everything open to the air? Having it open could potentially harm the air flow and result in higher temps.Frostburn said:CPU 95.0F / 35.0C
MB 87.8F / 31.0C
My Question: Is this temp normal?
True, but I'm just annoyed when there are staggered launches within the same generation of chipsets by like 6 months. LGA 2011 isn't hitting until Q3.CrankyJay said:Something new will always be coming out.
mclaren777 said:Is the side installed on your case or is everything open to the air? Having it open could potentially harm the air flow and result in higher temps.
Raistlin said:Seeing how I'm going 5760 x 1080 (3 x 1080p), you can understand my frustrations![]()
2600+ CPU and dual PowerColor PCS++ HD 6950 assuming the price is respectableSmokey said:what specs you have/will have?
If this were months ago it would be worth considering. At this point, though, it isn't a good idea. Apart from your drops in Crysis you seem to be happy with your performance in games and general use. Good quality P45s are mostly gone from the market and the ones that you may be able to find will usually be overpriced.DarkUSS said:How much does a good s775 motherboard cost these days really? I guess if I could find one under 100EUR that allows for further OC of my Q9550 and can accommodate SLI configuration, it would be a reasonable purchase, right?
In any case, thanks for the advice feist.
Do you have this CPU in your PC? If so, your best bet would be to start budgeting for a new PC. Even a low-cost one would be a huge improvement.Dirtyshubb said:This is probably not the ideal place for this question since its for upgrading a pc and not getting a new one but this is where im most likely going to get an answer.
Thinking about upgrading my pc but as its an older one (Packard Bell Imedia 1804) its a bit hard to find any info for it.
Basically I wanna know what I could upgrade on it if I wanted to, I have previously added RAMM so that I can handle but I wasnt too sure about any other components that could help it performance wise. To be honest im not too worried about playing games on it but more for just general speed and for file converting as I get a lot of HD shows that need rebuilding (from IDM) and converting to play on PS3 so anything that could help speed up this would be great.
I know its a bit of a long shot but I was hoping someone here could help which would be great, thanks.
Check the OP.TheKurgan said:I have Bios flashed my 6950 up to a 6970 and have increased power to the card by 20% - as per guide. Last night I finally got around to testing a few games on Steam and I had some artifacts in an older game HOMMV, but Crysis didn't have any artifacts. Not sure if the problem is a driver issue or a GPU issue.
Is there a good utility to test out my GPU to make sure my flash and power bump is stable?
There isn't really a reason to go above those at that resolution. Yes, 768MB is enough. Either GPU will max just about anything you throw at them, and perform well with titles like Crysis and Metro 2033.peppermints said:So for the foreseeable future, my display will be 19" with a max res of 1440x900.
Is there any need to get a card better than a GTX460/HD6850 and is 768MB enough for that resolution?
From the perspective of the OS, video memory is always a fixed size IIRC. It's dynamically mapped/allocated and Win7 just has a pointer to its I/O address range.M.Bluth said:Quick question, does the RAM limit for the 64-bit editions of Windows 7 include the GPU RAM?
In other words, if I have a 16GB RAM rig with a 1GB Video Card I'll have to get either Professional or Ultimate, since Home Premium only supports 16GB, correct?
Krauser Kat said:Im pretty sure you should stay put for a little long until their is something you want to upgrade for. The q9550 should keep you going for a while longer.
Maybe hold out until bulldozer amds come out and maybe drop the price on a 2500k. Some of us got it 179 plus tax already so spending money on a mobo that you are already almost maxed out on power wise with your current set up might not be money well spent.
Cool, guess I'll wait until this fall and consider the available options then again.·feist· said:If this were months ago it would be worth considering. At this point, though, it isn't a good idea. Apart from your drops in Crysis you seem to be happy with your performance in games and general use. Good quality P45s are mostly gone from the market and the ones that you may be able to find will usually be overpriced.
You're already at 3GHz+, don't seem to be particularly bottlenecked by the CPU, and while it would be nice to have the option of clocking higher, it just isn't cost effective to do so right now. Hold off for a bit, then see what your options are over the next 4-12 months of tech releases.
Basic Desktop Questions
Your Current Specs: 8 YEAR OLD DELL, NOT WORTH MENTIONING (P4 2.8, RADEON 9800 PRO, ETC.)
Budget: $700-750
Main Use: GAMING
Monitor Resolution: 1440X900 WITH A LATER MONITOR UPGRADE
List SPECIFIC games that you MUST be able to play: N/A, BUT WOULD LIKE IT TO BE ABLE TO PLAY MOST/ALL GAMES CURRENTLY RELEASED SOMEWHAT WELL
Are reusing any parts?: NO
When will you build?: WILL BE ORDERING PARTS THIS WEEKEND
Will you be overclocking?: NO
Things I need: WINDOWS 7
Things I don't need: MONITOR
mclaren777 said:You are basically me, Gloomfire. In fact, I'm currently posting this with my eight-year-old Dell, as my first-ever build sits behind me waiting for the UPS guy to arrive with my final component.
Your budget is a little tight, especially considering that you will also need a copy of W7, but I'll see what I can do to help.
Corky said:So is it safe to assume that the 6990 will simply be 2 6970s running together?
Yes, have her get W7 because it could be free (depending on the school) or you can get it directly from Microsoft for $30.Gloomfire said:My fiancee is a student, if that will help get a cheaper copy of W7.
DoctorWho said:Your Current Specs: I'm on an iMac Core 2 Due 4GB Ram (2.66hz)
Budget: $800 - $1000 - CANADA
Main Use: Gaming, 1080p playback.
Monitor Resolution: Not sure what the max res is of my monitor. I'm stuck at work right now.
List SPECIFIC games that you MUST be able to play: Crysis 2, Portal 2, WoW (lol), Dragon Age 2, Black Ops, Diablo III
Are reusing any parts?: NO
When will you build?: Let's say in a month.
Will you be overclocking?: Maybe
NCIX builds would be preferably since I'll probably have them build it. You don't have to include that $50 cost in the budget. I did this last year but didn't bite. Now that my move is done I' seriously considering it again.
Sandy Bridge also preferable.
rhfb said:Build looks much better (to me at least). Should be able to overclock to 4.5Ghz easy too. As for the monitor thing, the video card should come with a DVI -> VGA adapter, and if it doesn't, just spend the $2 to get one from any number of websites. No point in going to buy a new monitor if yours is doing fine.
WTF how long is that card? Will it even fit in a case? And how much will it be and when??!?!?longdi said:another angle, will AMD include some support bracket cause this guy looks like it can tear off your pci slot.
![]()