As if the platforming didn't get neglected enough. Count me out. I never found the shooting aspect of Jak II much fun.Basically, there are more vehicles and there is a bigger emphasis on shooting.
ur damn rightpilonv1 said:I'm sure in a few years we're going to look back at this "NINES ALL ROUND REVIEW SCORE FIRE SALE" and wonder what the fuck people were on. Jak II's 9.5 is a great example.
PS2 owner or not, Speevy has been right. And he certainly didn't seem to be trolling. You and dark seem to be taking the worst possible interpretation. Maybe there's history between you guys, because I don't see the cause for emotion.Marconelly said:Also, Speevy, since you don't have a PS2, please at least attempt to be informed before arguing anything about it. Honestly, you sound like you're just trolling, repeating the same kind of BS as people insisting that Xbox has only one game worth buying or some such crap.
Wyzdom said:Seeing the RIDICULOUS amount of Jak hate here, it's GAF i don't believe!!
You suck guys, look at you.
Who are you seriously?
1- frustrated people from the change of looks between Jak1 and 2?
2- frustrated people that though Jak2 was cheap but in fact it's that you're a wussie at games?
3- can't drive the fucking aircraft full speed without crashing? ( i can!!)
4- you don't like action-platformers but you still fuck around Jak threads to troll?
Forsete said:If anyone is interested PlayFrance have some kick arse Jak 3 vids.
http://www.playfrance.com/downloads/videos/view/04963642415158,749,.html
evilromero said:1 and 5. 5 because Jak 2 simply sucked and wasn't fun.
evilromero said:1 and 5. 5 because Jak 2 simply sucked and wasn't fun.
.evilromero said:Jak 2 simply sucked and wasn't fun.
evilromero said:1 and 5. 5 because Jak 2 simply sucked and wasn't fun.
Speevy said:"I'm glad you like it."
-Nintendo
Deku Tree said:Sounds to me like Jak III is 0.1 better than Jak II.
evilromero said:So I can't hold an opinion? Is that it? I beat Jak 2, didn't think it was difficult, rather I just didn't like a lot of the missions. Thought the game tried to do too much and failed in a lot of ways, mostly the lame hoverboard and mech missions. Also, the always-tedious "chase down some person" or "get across town in some matter of time" wasn't fun either.
evilromero said:Actually, you're getting into fuzzy territory yourself when you try to define free-roaming. To me, a game like Mario Sunshine is just as free-roaming as Jak 2. And I don't dislike free-roaming games (trying to stick to what your definition is), but recent examples like GTA and Jak 2 completely lack any kind of real structure or development (other than the stronger narrative in Jak 2). Wasn't Jak 1 just as "free-roaming" as Jak 2? All they did was let you jump into citizen's cars and fly around the city, it didn't make it any more free roaming. You still had to use "portals" to get to the levels, either by taking a dropship to a location or going through a teleporter to begin a level.
[Agrees with IGN review]
evilromero said:1 and 5 simply because I was frustrated due to me sucking at the game and I also couldn't manage to control the vehicles for shit, despite numerous other people having no difficulty doing so. Yet, I continue to post in Jak threads knowing full well that my opinion is misinformed due to my lack of experience from playing the game (and must be padded with some cliche bullshit complaints) and that I would have never enjoyed it in the first place due to my lack of interest in action platformers.
olimario said:Jak is a worse offender than Ratched when it comes to good 'platformers'.
If Jak is a platformer, DMC is too. The focus of the game is combat and the controls and weight of the character don't lend themselves well to platforming.
olimario said:Jak is a worse offender than Ratched when it comes to good 'platformers'.
If Jak is a platformer, DMC is too. The focus of the game is combat and the controls and weight of the character don't lend themselves well to platforming.
Gattsu25 said:because the only platformer, this gen, with good character weight and momentum is Mario we've all heard your opinion before :b
DSN2K said:JAK II 9.5
JAL III 9.6
what are IGN on these days ??? :lol
He may have been right in his original statement, but the way he sprinkled it with all kinds of poetic ridiculousness in the later posts was just rolleyes worthy.PS2 owner or not, Speevy has been right. And he certainly didn't seem to be trolling.
No dark10x, Sony has released 2 platforms that spare the player not one overly long load screen. Remember that joke video about RE4 on the PS2? That wasn't an exaggeration.
olimario said:It's the damn truth. It's also the only platformer this gen to really be a platformer with well-designed, complex and challenging stages.
olimario said:Jak is a worse offender than Ratched when it comes to good 'platformers'.
If Jak is a platformer, DMC is too. The focus of the game is combat and the controls and weight of the character don't lend themselves well to platforming.
olimario said:It's the damn truth.
Littleberu said:Well you don't like [. . .]. You know, you can NOT LIKE [. . .], that doesn't mean [. . .] sucks. That's the problem here at GAF, if you do not like [. . .], then it sucks, and everybody who say the contrary is wrong. Too much elitist.
dark10x said:I don't agree with the stage comment...or at least, I don't FULLY agree.
Mario had SOME very solid stages...but the second half of the game was absolutely ABYSMAL to the max. I absolutely hated those later areas...
olimario said:Mario wasn't the complete experience it should have been, I agree. It needed another year in the oven and a lot more attention.
That said, the good in the game is extremely good and IS the only good platforming this gen.
dark10x said:Oh yes, the good parts of the game are some of the best platforming you'll encounter this gen...
I enjoyed Maximo 2 and Klonoa 2 a bit more, though, I must admit. Mario's play mechanics are the best of the bunch, though...but the rest of the design didn't appeal to me.
Yes it does! It is an superb game! Simple as that!Gattsu25 said:Axsider
Member
makes sense.