As a lover of bad movies, I always laugh when someone says a movie such as this is one of the worst movies they have ever seen. Such hyperbole! Until you've watched something like Witchcraft 13: Blood of the Chosen, you have no idea what a truly bad movie is.
There's a big difference between a bad straight to DVD film...
and a bad 165 million dollar summer blockbuster with A list actors, directors, and writers. You hold people with more experience and paychecks to a higher standard.
This movie was REALLY REALLY BAD....
Did I emphasis Really enough?
Where to begin? I don't feel like typing alot because this movie literally does not deserve the effort or energy.
-It felt like a movie from the past but with today's technology/effects/green screen.
Primarily the script. It's as if it's a movie that ignored the evolution of what movies have become today and instead....decided to be a real BY THE NUMBERS with every hollywood trope you can think of.
-Literally 90% of the jokes fall flat because they are predictable, corny, bad timing, or just plain stupid.
-The acting was ATROCIOUS except for Jeff Goldbloom. He is literally the only actor in this movie worth a damn. Everyone else is either bad, or laughably bad.
-geezus the dialogue in this script.......it's literally the worst thing ever.
-a shit ton of plot holes but you know, I'm willing to give plot holes a pass with anything futuristic/sci-fi/aliens/summer blockbuster.....but....They couldn't get anything else right so this doesn't get a pass.
I'd say the Only positives of this movie is the "spectacle" of some of the action and destruction, and Jeff Goldbloom, and the fact there are 3 acts. I mean, with how bad the movie is, the fact that it actually has a start a middle and an end is an achievement.
This movie literally makes Batman vs Superman seem like a masterpeice.
Do not waste your time or money on this turd. if you haven't seen it and are lurking in this thread.
I hope this movie dies a fast but horrible death at the box offices so that Hollywood knows that we won't accept shit shows like this.
ditch the 'they need our molten core' motivation for the aliens--the white destiny orb is motivation enough
I dunno. That's why the aliens came in '96. The Harvester really came to finish the job. The Sphere was just something they found out about while they were here.
Now that I think about it, if there was one specific ship sent to drill to the core in '96, what was the point of the mothership? Why wasn't it drilling?
As a lover of bad movies, I always laugh when someone says a movie such as this is one of the worst movies they have ever seen. Such hyperbole! Until you've watched something like Witchcraft 13: Blood of the Chosen, you have no idea what a truly bad movie is.
There's a big difference between a bad straight to DVD film...
and a bad 165 million dollar summer blockbuster with A list actors, directors, and writers. You hold people with more experience and paychecks to a higher standard.
Hey didn't they get a few thousand feet from the molten core??? Wouldn't that be like bad even if they didn't finish?
It was a retcon, but not a very well thought out one. In the first film they were just there to conquer worlds for their own, which seemed like enough of a reason for invasion to me. Coming back to finish the job, but with a more overwhelming force to ensure victory, only to be thwarted by the last of their ancient, nearly defeated enemy (Orbie) would have worked, IMO.
It was a retcon, but not a very well thought out one. In the first film they were just there to conquer worlds for their own, which seemed like enough of a reason for invasion to me. Coming back to finish the job, but with a more overwhelming force to ensure victory, only to be thwarted by the last of their ancient, nearly defeated enemy (Orbie) would have worked, IMO.
Not exactly accurate. In the lab scene, The President mentions how they're "Like locusts". They go from planet to planet, taking their resources, and moving on.
They just never went into detail about what and how. I see the retcon as valid, It's just not stable on the idea that they were after the core.
Maybe if they wait another 20 years.dear god no....unless we get different writers, actors and director
a few thing i believe would have improved the film
needed to cut the main pretty boy actor and just have it be about smith's son and the president's daughter
remove the deep sea salvage subplot
ditch the 'they need our molten core' motivation for the aliens--the white destiny orb is motivation enough
ax goldblum's father's subplot with the children
spend a bit more time inside the alien ship, developing their background and story
expand on the guerrilla war in africa thus giving the warlord guy some reason to be in the film
anyway, it was fun i guess. the first film is superior in my opinion
As a lover of bad movies, I always laugh when someone says a movie such as this is one of the worst movies they have ever seen. Such hyperbole! Until you've watched something like Witchcraft 13: Blood of the Chosen, you have no idea what a truly bad movie is.
I am also an aficionado of terrible movies, I've seen stuff like Abraxas. Those are movies so terrible that you go to see them for their terribleness. No, ID42 isn't the worst movie I've ever seen. But it's annoyingly ho-hum.
No way do you axe that subplot with the kids.
Solely because the rest of the film has NO consequences for the average person. That subplot is the only one putting across actual loss. I mean, Hillier's Mum dies and the film spends fuck all time with him - the teenage girl driving the car having a breakdown is the only time the film conveys the stakes of what's going on from a regular persons POV.
Whew, what a wet fart of a sequel that was.
This was one of the stupidest movies I've ever seen. OK, original Independence Day is dumb as hell, sure, but it works in that setting. Resurgence just goes way too far. Every single scene is just perplexing to the max. Why did the aliens see the President's speech when receiving the distress beacon. How did the hauling ship not break when lifting a humongous cannon. Why did they just blindly attack the sphere when it appeared. Why did they eradicate the aliens almost worldwide... and left Africa to fight them for a decade? How did nobody notice aliens drilled a huuuge hole in the ground. Why did the queen leave for the sphere herself? Why when protecting the queen the alien ships did not, well, protect the queen but kept on encircling her as she was gunned down? Why wasn't the excavator's ship sucked into the whirlpool after drilling stopped? Why was the entire presidential line of succession all flown into one place and why was Fichtner immediately declared new president?
...and so on and so on, it's just a tip of the iceberg, nothing makes sense. There are some decent, interesting ideas, as GhaleonEB said, but they are butchered, totally butchered.
The new cast is abysmal. The most uninteresting set of characters I've seen in a while.
There is no tension at all. The stakes should be high, the planet's core is at stake, but it feels far less threatening than the invasion in the original Independence Day. The aliens do nothing for the majority of the movie. The pacing is horrible.
I felt... nothing. It's mind-boggingly stupid and uninteresting. Still, I'd love to see the sequel to see how they would handle the ludicrous notion of humanity leading the resistance against the Harvesters because of reasons, but I'm aware it's never happening.
I guess I liked the Alien Queen, that was handled decently. Beyond that, it's a 3 out of 10 movie AT BEST.
I'm jealous. I wish I could have turned my brain off.
I enjoy brainless popcorn flicks - that's what I was hoping for when I went - but I thought this fell short of that. To me a good popcorn movie is one that knows what it is and rolls with it. ID: Resurgence had a level of dumb to it that kept startling me out of the action stupor I was hoping to be in. As CassSept touched on, I found myself thinking, "Wait, that's stupid," at nearly every scene. The aliens plan didn't make sense, what the humans did in response didn't make sense.
Thinking back over it, I'm realizing I didn't enjoy a single action scene in the entire film. The falling gun/rescue scene at the beginning was perfunctory and tension free. The ship landing on a good swath of earth somehow has less visual impact and none of the build up, tension or spectacle of the initial attack in ID4. When they do stage an action scene well, we get stuff like the school bus full of kids driving around in the open under the alien queen's feet. I wanted to switch my brain off, but it kept rebelling.
It made me realize the casting director was the real hero of ID4. Can you imagine that movie had with the cast of newcomers this movie had? Swap out Will Smith for Not Will Smith in Resurgence, or Bill Pullman for...whoever the President was in this. Replace Goldblum with his female counterpart in Resurgence, and Hemsworth for Randy Freaking Quaid. Those characters won us over, they had us pulling for them, they elevated material that had no business working as well as it did. (Goldblum and Pullman do it again in Resurgence, to their credit.) Randy flying off into the big alien dong in ID4 was that nexus between cheesy and sincere that this movie never landed.
I never once found myself rooting for anyone, like I was in ID4. Stuff just happened for convoluted reasons while characters I didn't care about went through the motions of an action movie with sub-par action staging. I really wish I could have shut my brain off, and I'm actually envious of those who were able to.
With how much it seems like this movie cribs from macross and yamato etc, sure would be nice if them fighter jets could have had a humanoid form eh?
Wouldn't it be easier to go scoop out the cores of uninhabited planets?
I just stumbled upon this video which shows a deleted scene in ID4 that would explain the whole virus planted in the alien's craft thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsTguQvmq8k
Also the video is really cool, I'd make a thread if I could, but I'm juniored. lol
Not exactly accurate. In the lab scene, The President mentions how they're "Like locusts". They go from planet to planet, taking their resources, and moving on.
They just never went into detail about what and how. I see the retcon as valid, It's just not stable on the idea that they were after the core.
I was expecting bad, but that was Die Hard 5 bad. Will Smith is a goddamn genius for staying far far away from this turd.
And what the fuck was up with Vivica A. Fox? What an amazingly unnecessary cameo.
This might not even be worth a Red Box rental.
Doc BrackishSo who was the 'gay character' mentioned in an interview back in 2013?
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/26/independence-day-2-will-feature-a-gay-character
Doc Brackish
Yep. It's actually funny that most folks don't remember this from the first movie. It was very clear that they were after the resources on the planet but we simply didn't know what resources they wanted. So I don't really consider it a retcon at all.