PropellerEar
Member
Thanks. Where were you when the 5/5 reviews were being handed out?
Now It got handed a 2/5, and I shared it in this thread.
Thanks. Where were you when the 5/5 reviews were being handed out?
And I thanked you for it. Now go out and find some others and report back with as much enthusiasm! Chop chop!
Now It got handed a 2/5, and I shared it in this thread.
You're welcome.And I thanked you for it.
Happened to me, the game is really good. Can’t stop playing, really well executed and fun. Have vibes of old school games.
My biggest gripe though is the gun. I quite fancy a wee shoot out now and again, but it’s almost impossible to do without attracting the attention of lots of enemies. So very pointless thus far - maybe I’ll get to use it later?
2 out of 5 material right there!Back up to 87 on Opencritic and 88/87 on Metacritic. Will it stay there? Who knows.
Back up to 87 on Opencritic and 88/87 on Metacritic. Will it stay there? Who knows.
87% on Meta, teetering on the edge of 90. Let’s be real, though, if this were an MS exclusive, it’d be a 90+ faster than you can say ‘Game Pass!’ Some reviewers just can’t resist sprinkling a little extra stardust on that Xbox charm; this is not exclusive to Sony.Deaf person AND a lesbian?
Eh I think it's reviewed fairly. I am loving the game but it's got some flaws, the checkpoint system is pretty schizophrenic, the gunplay is kind of useless, and sometimes objectives or interactions are unclear. It doesn't have the play testing polish of some other big games.87% on Meta, teetering on the edge of 90. Let’s be real, though, if this were an MS exclusive, it’d be a 90+ faster than you can say ‘Game Pass!’ Some reviewers just can’t resist sprinkling a little extra stardust on that Xbox charm; this is not exclusive to Sony.
By the way, the Game is Great, this is what really matters
I hope it's better than Deathpoop.P
Eh I think it's reviewed fairly. I am loving the game but it's got some flaws, the checkpoint system is pretty schizophrenic, the gunplay is kind of useless, and sometimes objectives or interactions are unclear. It doesn't have the play testing polish of some other big games.
But still I love the game. This is one of those interesting original games that ends up in conversation with GOTY but never quite gets there. Like Deathloop or Control or Psychonauts 2.
I name these games specifically because they didn't have that universal consensus. I happened to enjoy Deathloop a lot but I also very much get that it wasn't for everyone and I think that's probably true of Indy as well.I hope it's better than Deathpoop.
Control was GOTY tier though.
87% on Meta, teetering on the edge of 90. Let’s be real, though, if this were an MS exclusive, it’d be a 90+ faster than you can say ‘Game Pass!’ Some reviewers just can’t resist sprinkling a little extra stardust on that Xbox charm; this is not exclusive to Sony.
By the way, the Game is Great, this is what really matters
Well historically speaking in terms of films or games that have more engaging plots than others, I would say yes, all of those things should be important in one way or another to the plot.Must every characteristic of a character, such as their age, appearance, profession or set of skills someone how be important to the plot? Or can a character have characteristics that are incidental, in the sense they don't need to be justified in some way by the story being told?
If a character can have such incidental characteristics, then the question is what is special about deafness such that it can't fall into this category and must always be justified when it appears?
I may not have been able to stop the reviews, but my latest tactic of going door to door to dissuade potential buyers clearly worked with the low concurrent users
Let's see...
Let's see...
Xbox tablet, green shirt...
What are you doing at Ass of Can Whooping's house?
Biggest news paper in Finland(even Nordic countries)
2/5
"Microsoft's Indiana Jones game is dull, repetitive and even unambitious."
Peliarvio | Legendaarinen Indiana Jones lerpahtaa odotetussa jättituotannossa
Microsoftin Indiana Jones -peli on vaimea, itseään toistava ja jopa kunnianhimoton.www.hs.fi
I’m sure Finland is a lovely country. But the latest Indiana Jones is not a 4/10 game, so I can only assume the reviewer was having a bad day or that somebody shat in his sautéed reindeer stew.Dull, repetitive, unambitious. Think the reviewer just forgot he was reviewing Finland.
The game has numerous good reviews. Very few people would find the game 'crap.' For the majority, it will be a pleasant experience.Game is good. I was expecting crap so I am pleasantly surprised. I also didn't buy it on steam since it's a play anywhere and it's day one game pass title so I wouldn't take the steam current user count too seriously.
Do we know something about a patch coming? I've heard Frame Gen is broken in this game. Is this true?
Spider-Man 2 is super woke DEI but the people who made it and the people who made this game are in the same cultural milieu which says that “representation matters” so they go out of their way to find places to put deaf people, people with vitiligo, disabled people, even if it looks dumb as hell like the operator in a wheelchair in R6 Siege. It doesn’t matter if the game is made by Sony, or EA, or Microsoft, or it is made in Sweden or North Carolina or California or France, that is the nature of the shitlib behemoth that has swamped game making. A game like Spjderman that takes place in modern NYC simply affords easier insertion of these elements than 1930s Europe or whatever.You mean Black deaf girl with half a shaved head that speaks in sign language and paints murals of black lives matter and other political DEI stuff all over the game.
I actually don't think you guys have the ability to see the difference of Sony games that are swamped with pride flags, black lives matter and LGBTQ+ forced messaging vs this.
You are genuinely embarassing yourself dude.
Plus, none of the above actually bothered me in spider man 2. I have said this. I found the Peter parker and Mary Jane power struggle much worse.
What?
It's a game about exploration, not action or fighting. I'm glad there are no basic and boring shootouts or a million exploding mummies, car driving etc. The game just doesn't need it. It's a loveletter for Indiana Jones fans who want to solve riddles and find hidden treasures.I've kinda fallen off this one, lads. A good five or six hours in the Vatican and the pacing and the story just aren't grabbing me. Indy feels like he needs something a little more action packed and - yes, I'm going to say it - more like Uncharted. I'll try to get back to it at some point, but there doesn't feel any kind of compulsion to see where the story is going right now.
It's a game about exploration, not action or fighting. I'm glad there are no basic and boring shootouts or a million exploding mummies, car driving etc. The game just doesn't need it. It's a loveletter for Indiana Jones fans who want to solve riddles and find hidden treasures.
I've kinda fallen off this one, lads. A good five or six hours in the Vatican and the pacing and the story just aren't grabbing me. Indy feels like he needs something a little more action packed and - yes, I'm going to say it - more like Uncharted. I'll try to get back to it at some point, but there doesn't feel any kind of compulsion to see where the story is going right now.
I've kinda fallen off this one, lads. A good five or six hours in the Vatican and the pacing and the story just aren't grabbing me. Indy feels like he needs something a little more action packed and - yes, I'm going to say it - more like Uncharted. I'll try to get back to it at some point, but there doesn't feel any kind of compulsion to see where the story is going right now.
It’s all of those things… but it’s also not really paced that well, IMO. I feel like I’m buggering about the Vatican doing lots of stuff with no strong throughline. Ah well. I guess I’ll get back to it eventually.