Which is fitting as Goldberg stole Roman's finisher.
Roman stole it from Gillberg
Which is fitting as Goldberg stole Roman's finisher.
Shut up foggy, you're a markTheir talents are being wasted, it's as simple as that. They're sacrificing growth and excellence for prestige and an easier paycheck. If that's what they value, that's fine, but for someone in his position and what he's done to get to that point I don't blame him. Besides, that's the kayfabe side of it. He's working his peers and he's working the people who for some reason get upset about this.
It's nice to want thingsRemember day one when they said they expected 4 mil long term paid subs
lmfao
Remember day one when they said they expected 4 mil long term paid subs
lmfao
People act so weird about network subbing in this thread, so if i like the E&C show, Unfiltered, Talking Smack, NXT + The back library I'm supposed to go through the trouble of stealing them instead of subbing to stick it to Vince in some futile rebellion?
I know, right?
I've been subscribed to the WWE Network since day one and don't have a single regret. Raw is trash tier lately, but I don't have a problem with anything else.
So wrestleGAF I have some questions. Thinking of adding a streaming source besides WWE Network. This floslam interests the hell out of me but is it worth it? Do you think they'll continue adding promotions or will it just kind of sputter and go away?
Thinking of doing the 150 for a year since that would save almost 8 bucks a month.
Personally, it was worth it for me as I was already buying most EVOLVE iPPVs for $10-15 twice/three times a month, so this works out a lot cheaper - if you're interested in following EVOLVE, then go for it. The other stuff's an added bonus, but it'll be interesting to see which indies they do sign in addition to those already on board. Hopefully something cool, IPW:UK's a good addition and their live supershow later this month should be a lot of fun.
I mean, for one, those guys need to provide for their families, and second, I don't know that its true. Apollo Crews might be dying on the vine, but he's making enough money to provide for his whole family.Their talents are being wasted, it's as simple as that. They're sacrificing growth and excellence for prestige and an easier paycheck. If that's what they value, that's fine, but for someone in his position and what he's done to get to that point I don't blame him. Besides, that's the kayfabe side of it. He's working his peers and he's working the people who for some reason get upset about this.
Vince will be on his death bed and he'll still be trying to think of ways to get Roman over without turning him heel. I fully believe Roman is Vince's last great attempt to prove to everyone that he is still a genius.
So wrestleGAF I have some questions. Thinking of adding a streaming source besides WWE Network. This floslam interests the hell out of me but is it worth it? Do you think they'll continue adding promotions or will it just kind of sputter and go away?
Thinking of doing the 150 for a year since that would save almost 8 bucks a month.
I think its an example of Vince digging in his heels against all logic combined with the fact that Roman doesn't seem to give a shit. There's plenty of evidence that guys like Rock, Austin or Jericho would have gone to Vince a long time ago to try and change the character to get over. Vince just doesn't want to admit he fucked up with the 2015 Rumble. I understand the kind of character he's trying to build, but its just not going to work once the fans are onto you.
So Roman is a biproduct of Vince being upset that everyone shit on Batista because Vince didn't push the most over guy in a decade?
The fact that Raw kind of sucks doesn't even matter for me because SmackDown being good now is a huge improvement because Raw and SmackDown both sucked the last decade or so.
It's hard to say the Brand Split didn't work when one of the shows is now worth watching.
You suckSmarks
Smackdown is worth watching because of Styles and Miz, and because it's a shorter show. Meanwhile, Raw actually got worse because of the Brand Split. All in all I think the Brand Split as it was done was a really bad idea.
A better idea for a Brand Split would have been to have no "formal" brand split. Have certain wrestlers appear just on Raw and others just on Smackdown - that way you achieve the "each show has different talent" feel but then if you have a bigger storyline you want to tell like AJ Styles fighting Kevin Owens for the WWE Title, then you aren't handcuffed by a brand split and can have both wrestlers on both shows for the duration of that story. Make the US Title the highlight belt of Raw and make the Intercontinental Title the highlight belt of Smackdown. Keep the Womens and Tag divisions together (because the brand split was horrible for these).
They used to have the top SmackDown guys show up on Raw for whatever reason all the time in the last brand split, and it was mostly bad. Having the lines between shows get blurred isn't usually good.
I mean, for one, those guys need to provide for their families, and second, I don't know that its true. Apollo Crews might be dying on the vine, but he's making enough money to provide for his whole family.
I was about to use Kevin Steen as an example of a guy who's getting used to his potential, but that's a pretty bad example, actually. He's such a good fit for the WWE style that its probably a bad thing if the WWE was using him as an example and hoping to pick up more versions of him in the indies.
I think its an example of Vince digging in his heels against all logic combined with the fact that Roman doesn't seem to give a shit. There's plenty of evidence that guys like Rock, Austin or Jericho would have gone to Vince a long time ago to try and change the character to get over. Vince just doesn't want to admit he fucked up with the 2015 Rumble. I understand the kind of character he's trying to build, but its just not going to work once the fans are onto you.
Look at it this way. The WWE will never get any better unless people vote with their wallets because they wholesale reject any other way that their audience provides feedback - constructive or otherwise - about their product.People act so weird about network subbing in this thread, so if i like the E&C show, Unfiltered, Talking Smack, NXT + The back library I'm supposed to go through the trouble of stealing them instead of subbing to stick it to Vince in some futile rebellion?
Marks
The last time Smackdown was good half of it's stars died and a couple of others were pretty close too, I wonder what tragic ending it'll have this time
I don't want to meet the person who would willingly wear this.
Additionally, it doesn't matter WHAT content you're providing them your money for, they will interpret your $9.99/month as a ringing endorsement for the current product and that you want to see Roman Reigns look strong.
NXT was already the watchable Smackdown show. The brand split basically murdered NXT.
I hated hated HATED him getting into those tests of strength with Hogan at WM19.Vince McMahon being competitive in wrestling matches is pretty much my least favorite thing.
Chances of Smackdown being better then Raw tonight?
Test of strength. Never heard of that maneuverI hated hated HATED him getting into those tests of strength with Hogan at WM19.
It was awful100%
...was Raw actually good last night?
NXT as a weekly show has been pretty bad for some time. The PPV's are always great but everything in between isn't.
Edit: I'm guessing that's down to the former writer there now currently being a writer for Smackdown which explains why SD is good right now.
NXT's big problem is that it has exactly one credible top guy. I actually think Joe and Nakamura hurt NXT more than they help because it turned the entire brand into 2 Tier S guys and a bunch of goobers who have no real chance to ever compete for the title.