The appeal would be the Gamepass and crossprogression with main Xbox or PC.If it's an Xbox Handheld, rather than a PC handheld, I think it'll be a tough sell. They don't have Nintendo's murder's row of exclusive software to push the thing, they don't have PC functionality to expand its feature set. I'm not sure I see the market for a portable Xbox Series S when something like the Steam Deck is around.
That wouldn't be an Xbox, that would be a windows PC in handheld from.I'm guessing it'll be like a Ally competitor, running Windows and not locked down like we would think of with a traditional handheld (PSP, GBA, etc).
My point is the Kinect didn't do anything in the grand scheme for Xbox. Like the Move, it ended up being little more than an accessory. Yes, it helped prolong the 360 at a time when motion controls were a big fad, but for the BRAND, it did little else and many would (and do) argue that's where the true downturn began.The dead end for Kinect V1 was the beginning of a new console generation. I'm sure any accessories made for current gen consoles would cease to be relevant, when the console manufacturers move to a new platform and don't allow the new console to use said accessory and related software.
If your argument was that Kinect V2 never managed to take off, then I would agree with you, but those are different devices on different platforms.
Edit: removed irrelevant comment.
Exactly, don’t know why people are so stupid, it’s gonna be closed box like the all the other Xbox consoles, if ms are going succeed, not only dose it have to be a steam deck killer, in every aspect, battery life, screen, comfort, specs, it also needs some unique features, glasses free next gen 3d maybe, it needs something to set it apart from others.What would be the incentive for MS to do this? People will just get it to run their steam games. So now MS loses on the hardware purchase and loses the 30% from software sales.
I havent bought any of the pc handhelds but I would buy a portable native xbox handheld. I don't really play pc games.This is gonna be a really tough sell. why would anyone buy the xbox handheld instead of any of the other half dozen pc handhelds that already allow you to play xbox games?
It's because of Windows that is going to be worse, lolA Microsoft Handheld would easily be better than Sony & Nintendo handhelds because of Windows
Let's wait and see their sales pitchI already have a ROG, why would I chump myself and get a MS handheld?
Unless the handheld somehow manages to do Steam integration or is a Windows OS that lets you install Steam on it, then I can't see this taking off either.They will still bring a traditional based console but I THINK its going to be more expensive than what people are used to
Unless it has Steam support, it immediately runs into both every problem the traditional Xbox HW console has, but now with the added benefit of having an established competitor in the market that gets every single game that the Xbox Handheld with but also already a part of your library (Steam Deck), and it now has to directly compete in the same space Nintendo is in, which is something Xbox HW hasn't had to do in a long while, not directly anyway.This is gonna be a really tough sell. why would anyone buy the xbox handheld instead of any of the other half dozen pc handhelds that already allow you to play xbox games?
Funny but no lolIt's because of Windows that is going to be worse, lol
I think the writing is on the wall for Xbox and if things don’t turn around with this handheld and an expensive big boy console that could very well be their lastUnless the handheld somehow manages to do Steam integration or is a Windows OS that lets you install Steam on it, then I can't see this taking off either.
I'm sorry, but I think we are talking past each other, as I am in no way talking about the Kinects impact on the Xbox brand. I thought you were insinuating that MS wasn't able to cash in on that "wii crowd money" with the Kinect, and I was just affirming that MS actually did. Maybe I missed your original point.My point is the Kinect didn't do anything in the grand scheme for Xbox. Like the Move, it ended up being little more than an accessory. Yes, it helped prolong the 360 at a time when motion controls were a big fad, but for the BRAND, it did little else and many would (and do) argue that's where the true downturn began.
Seems like MS is seeing the money Nintendo is making and wants in on it.
Just like with Kinect after the Wii's massive success.
And look how that turned out
I would like to add, with the current rise of handheld PC's, I wouldn't count out the rumored "Xbox Handheld" before we know anything about it. Regardless if Xbox is someone's current primary platform, there are dozens of millions of people who own digital Xbox content (going back to 360) that might find it attractive to play on the go. The gamepass proposition also allows for a "built in library" for newcomers. Just saying, this doesn't have to put up Xbox 360 numbers to be a big win for MS.The Kinect V1 was a phenomenal success for them. It sold them 10m Xboxes at the end of its life cycle.
Exactly, don’t know why people are so stupid, it’s gonna be closed box like the all the other Xbox consoles, if ms are going succeed, not only dose it have to be a steam deck killer, in every aspect, battery life, screen, comfort, specs, it also needs some unique features, glasses free next gen 3d maybe, it needs something to set it apart from others.
I already have a ROG, why would I chump myself and get a MS handheld?
Honestly, based on some convos i've had, i'm honestly not secure in the notion that we even make to the point of this HW launching. So much more money to be made focusing on SW and not worrying about the costs of dealing in the HW space.I think the writing is on the wall for Xbox and if things don’t turn around with this handheld and an expensive big boy console that could very well be their last
They are still doubling down this next gen
what is funny is that MS created windows and they keep messing around itFunny but no lol
A high-end Windows or Android handheld plus a good community would be greatness
what is funny is that MS created windows and they keep messing around it
Yep, seems like the elephant in the room. Keeping in mind this would be a first instead of iteration, there would be a lot to solve.f they're still prototyping then you're not going to be seeing it anytime in the near future.
You're also not getting an AMD powered series s into a handheld until 2026 at least.
So even if its fairly performant its not likely to be similarly balanced across CPU/GPU for instance.
All fine but you ignored my point. Unless it exceeds the S and can essentially emulate it, it will actually have its own performance profile. So not a straight pick up the S version and package it for the handheld.Better to have a fast cpu to handle min fps and and an ok gpu that can lower settings anyways. I assure you, low settings on a mobile screen will still look better to most people than on a big tv with a more powerful gpu. Having a crisp clean image is key. MS is backed into a corner, we'll see what money can do if they are willing to spend it.
All fine but you ignored my point. Unless it exceeds the S and can essentially emulate it, it will actually have its own performance profile. So not a straight pick up the S version and package it for the handheld.
It raises questions about back compatibility performance etc. If its part of the Xbox family rather than being a PC handheld competitor it ends up with all the baggage attached. The BC side of things would probably have to be down to MS, but for devs going forward they will be saddled with meeting QA on a third SKU. All I can say is they better sell a lot of them or devs will just opt out, and if its the option of all Xbox SKU's or none, the devs might chose none.Sure, I get your point but it's really not that complicated if the CPU is similar or better performing. I'm not saying it's a 5 minute fix here, but if MS wants this to be successful they will pay for the inconvenience.
It raises questions about back compatibility performance etc. If its part of the Xbox family rather than being a PC handheld competitor it ends up with all the baggage attached. The BC side of things would probably have to be down to MS, but for devs going forward they will be saddled with meeting QA on a third SKU. All I can say is they better sell a lot of them or devs will just opt out, and if its the option of all Xbox SKU's or none, the devs might chose none.
Everyone initially cashed in on it, but it didn't really mean much in the end. It wasn't a sticking point for consoles (hence: "turned out"). Sony cashed in on 3D in the early 2010s, for example, and by the PS4's release, it was largely ignored based on the same principle.I'm sorry, but I think we are talking past each other, as I am in no way talking about the Kinects impact on the Xbox brand. I thought you were insinuating that MS wasn't able to cash in on that "wii crowd money" with the Kinect, and I was just affirming that MS actually did. Maybe I missed your original point.
Microsoft is always late to the party.
There's already enough handhelds on the market, and by the time they release something the market will be severely oversaturated.
Because a while ago we learned. Every screen is an XboxSo why call it Xbox if it runs PC games???
It's confusing
So their competitor is now the Steam Deck???
LOL
I'd wouldn't rush to release this product. Let the Switch successor be on the market for a while so you can release a significantly more powerful machine.
You mean look how they sold a ton of them ? Because like it or not, that's what happened.And look how that turned out
Worth noting that this type of device side steps Sony's issues. This doesn't just run Microsoft's games - it's a Series S in your hands: it'll run every Xbox game. Assassin's Creed, Madden, Resident Evil, Street Fighter, Final Fantasy - all automatically supported. Sony simply didn't convince anyone to develop exclusive titles; Microsoft doesn't need to convince anyone. The issue is: does the market want a mini Xbox in their hands? It doesn't seem to want one at all right now, so I'm not sure making it smaller solves the problems Xbox has.Microsoft is always late to the party.
There's already enough handhelds on the market, and by the time they release something the market will be severely oversaturated.
Besides that, Sony tried twice and failed. Yeah a big part of that was the proprietary memory and lack of game support, but one of those issues already plagues Microsoft.
How Microsoft actually thinks they can succeed, I don't know.