I call bs on this.
Reviewers have had the game for weeks. MS can differentiate retail from hacked, otherwise havent the journos been banned?
Pretty soon every game is going to have to check online with a server to verify play date, data on the disc, etc. You don't have an internet connection? Too bad, no play. Even for offline only games. It's just inevitable.
It was the store's incompetence actually.
Well, there you go.
Chew the shit out of this bs policy. If you're going to bend over like that, of course they will walk all over you
This has been answered already. Journos have been banned because they didnt add their Gamertags to a list that MS provides.
I call bs on this.
Reviewers have had the game for weeks. MS can differentiate retail from hacked, otherwise havent the journos been banned?
they have our gamertags
There is a big difference between copies being sold within 24 hours of the street date and well over a week. When these games are delivered to stores they come with a very specific seal and paperwork clearly saying "DO NOT SELL BEFORE 11/6/2012", with also listing possible penalties if caught doing so.as it's possible (and likely) at least a large handful of copies will be purchased before launch by those that don't breathe gaming news.
Why is it a shame? That you can't scam the system by dealing with stores that should be prosecuted or fined? That you have to wait like all the other gamers and stores that do follow the rules?I likely won't bother playing in future titles early - which is a shame.
Street dates are for retailers.As a developer, I'm totally on MS side here. I'm personally surprised in the defense for the guy who bought it fully knowing he was breaking the rules and considering the store would 'ring it out' on launch day just tells you how shady it is.
Breaking streets dates is serious. While it is nice of Frank to step in and help this guy out, this guy still stepped in shit on his own.
You took a risk and came out on the wrong side. Deal with it.
The game is fully leaked, there can't be any huge secret in there that isn't already out to the people who want to read it, I'd imagine.I really fucking wish i could tell you guys why its important MS is restricting the game right now to those they know about
but i can't until thursday
As a developer, I'm totally on MS side here. I'm personally surprised in the defense for the guy who bought it fully knowing he was breaking the rules and considering the store would 'ring it out' on launch day just tells you how shady it is.
Breaking streets dates is serious. While it is nice of Frank to step in and help this guy out, this guy still stepped in shit on his own.
There is a big difference between copies being sold within 24 hours of the street date and well over a week. When these games are delivered to stores they come with a very specific seal and paperwork clearly saying "DO NOT SELL BEFORE 11/6/2012", with also listing possible penalties if caught doing so.
its not related to the game itself or whats on the disc.
Very intriguing, I look forward to finding out. Certainly don't answer if it could get you in trouble, but is it something that will be wildly known, and obviously what you're referring to on the day?its not related to the game itself or whats on the disc.
He has admitted to not having a receipt, so it isn't a legal sale. No legal proof of purchase.Buyers don't have legal teams to make retail agreements with wholesalers or publishers.
This is a very special case. Typically stores don't get games two weeks before a game street date. As well as most games have soft street dates, meaning if they are broken it isn't a huge deal. Something like Halo 4, Call of Duty, or others you have a number of reasons why breaking the street date is so serious. The first being piracy. We have already seen Halo 4 available for download. The second being alignment with marketing which for a large game could be a huge amount of money. Third is the possibility of damaging the game with early word of mouth.Personally, street dates are my biggest pet peeve in gaming. Just get the damn game out there and in the hands of fans.
The game is fully leaked, there can't be any huge secret in there that isn't already out to the people who want to read it, I'd imagine.
So you bought it early and I am assuming you know that people have been banned before for playing early released games while signed in. So why'd you do it?
Your post just makes you seem like such a victim and Microsoft is so evil.
As a developer, I'm totally on MS side here. I'm personally surprised in the defense for the guy who bought it fully knowing he was breaking the rules and considering the store would 'ring it out' on launch day just tells you how shady it is.
This. Everyone knows the release date is November 6th and more importantly, that Halo 4 had leaked, so playing it while connected is a fantastically stupid thing to do.
Oh hohoho. This grade A bullshit. The man bought the game legit, fair and square. Not his fault stores broke street date.
He's didn't acquire the game through illegal means and isn't leaking any of it's contents on the internet. The ban is unwarranted.
No of course, I just mean that can't be a reason for MS to ban Halo 4 players, because it doesn't change the game having leaked. If you want to know how Halo 4 ends, it's really easy to find out. In fact, you have to actively avoid it.The thing about the embargo is even if somebody who's played the leak through one means or another hit upon the right thing and are talking about it all over the web, we can't acknowledge it because we signed the agreement not to talk 'til Thursday.
That said, I'm not really sure what Choc's talking about specifically, and I'm staring at my embargo right now.. I might just be missing something obvious.
As a developer, I'm totally on MS side here. I'm personally surprised in the defense for the guy who bought it fully knowing he was breaking the rules and considering the store would 'ring it out' on launch day just tells you how shady it is.
Breaking streets dates is serious. While it is nice of Frank to step in and help this guy out, this guy still stepped in shit on his own.
There is a big difference between copies being sold within 24 hours of the street date and well over a week. When these games are delivered to stores they come with a very specific seal and paperwork clearly saying "DO NOT SELL BEFORE 11/6/2012", with also listing possible penalties if caught doing so.
Why is it a shame? That you can't scam the system by dealing with stores that should be prosecuted or fined? That you have to wait like all the other gamers and stores that do follow the rules?
Buyers don't have legal teams to make retail agreements with wholesalers or publishers.
I am extremely curious now...is it a good thing or a bad thing?I really fucking wish i could tell you guys why its important MS is restricting the game right now to those they know about
but i can't until thursday
Absolutely!! The fines for selling the last book for Harry Potter were HUGE if I remember correctly.Prosecuted or fined?
For breaking a fucking street date?
Agreed 100%Right, but I think it's similar to buying stolen goods.
You're buying something that can't be legally sold to you, so even if you aren't aware you can still be held accountable.
The retailer refusing to give him a receipt should have been a big red flag. Glad things worked out for him, but buying something under those terms is silly and any claiming innocence afterwards is intellectually dishonest at best. Guy all but admits he knew what he was doing
Doesn't matter, Microsoft plainly said anyone playing Halo 4 early will be banned.
He didn't listen.
There's a big difference in legality between criminal acts (stolen goods) and 'pre-street date sales' which fall wholly under civil law, specifically contract law.Right, but I think it's similar to buying stolen goods.
You're buying something that can't be legally sold to you, so even if you aren't aware you can still be held accountable. because if not who would say they were?
You're buying something that can't be legally sold to you, so even if you aren't aware you can still be held accountable. because if not who would say they were?
There's a big difference in legality between criminal acts (stolen goods) and 'pre-street date sales' which fall wholly under civil law, specifically contract law.
There's a big difference in legality between criminal acts (stolen goods) and 'pre-street date sales' which fall wholly under civil law, specifically contract law.
relax. I will take care of it. Your copy is not legitimate - the store efffed up. But you will be unbanned soon.
So everyone automatically is supposed to know this?
I didn't even know modded systems could get on XBL, that seems crazy to me.Good stuff. =)
This thread does surprise me though, I thought the system was automated to detect pirated versions. Maybe he was manually flagged by someone or something, but at least its something that will be taken care of if you can prove its a legit copy.
You don't have to care whatever agreements are in place between the person that sells the game to you and the distributor. If you are buying games at a video games store you can reasonably expect that they aren't stolen goods. Everything else doesn't have to concern you.
Fencing of stolen goods is a completely different matter.
You don't have to care whatever agreements are in place between the person that sells the game to you and the distributor. If you are buying games at a video games store you can reasonably expect that they aren't stolen goods. Everything else doesn't have to concern you.
Fencing of stolen goods is a completely different matter.