I agree with this, but it is hard to put all the blame for "spoiling it" on them as free individuals when you see their holy book specifically instructs them to "disciple" in this manner all throughout. To whatever extent someone is moderate, they are ignoring many of the scriptures they say they believe in, so I would say it is a problem with the religion itself. If you think that is not true because everyone ignores some passages and there is thus no solid form to the thing, and it could be anything people choose it to be, then it is reduced to nothing but a title you place on a social movement and we have ceased talking about religion and are discussing a vague notion of spirituality.
It's "shoving it down your throat" just because I have a weighted and multifaceted opinion that I expressed? I've gotten this kind of response in other places when I've talked about mental illness/depression, feminism/rape culture, socialism, ecology, military action, etc and I really don't get it. It seems like a cheap way to blow someone off and avoid discussing things by any meaningful measure.
I didn't tell you guys what to believe, I only said that I think the things pointed out are a small part of the whole picture. I explained that my conviction is based on a great deal of experience and knowledge in order to communicate that it would take a lot to make me a moderate on the issue, not to try and be overbearing about what position you ought to take. I also never said that religion is deprived of good, only that I think the bad sides of it are ubiquitous and often overlooked for the good.
If you simply don't want to talk about it that is fine, and go ahead and say that, but I think it's dishonest to describe what I've written here in this way. I was intentionally trying to be personally expressive rather than combative. I don't see why it should be taken as combative just because my feelings toward religion are negative rather than neutral. Neutral is not some enlightened default for all things in life.