Damn....so we gonna have Xbox vs PlayStation battling in the handheld space?
Warriors....
![]()
Now I see them as earbuds. You might be right.Ah, I confused the other icon with the new style earbuds.
Kinda like how the price of the PS5 Pro was met with universal praise?PS6 S
The reviews are in:
"Doesn't hold back development even a little bit."
"I didn't even notice the lack of disc drive."
It was absolutely horrific in terms of handcuffing 1st party developers who could never push the series x to it's limits as they would always have to have the gimp version S at the forefront when it came to resource allocation.The reality is that the Series S strategy was brilliant and it wouldn't surprise me at all if it gets copied.
Sir, I hate to inform you of this, but the Ambassador Program has been cancelled.The reality is that the Series S strategy was brilliant and it wouldn't surprise me at all if it gets copied. Components aren't coming down and console sales aren't growing. They absolutely will be forced to do it to have any hardware at an entry level price point for casual consumers. You can't demand that the entire physical reality of the component market changes to your whims, but you can ask developers to just spend a little more time optimizing very scalable engines. It's really the only logical play. And it will likely have no disc drive, which everyone saw converted MS customers to digital painlessly in the most enviable way possible. MS was right about all of it when they came up with that gameplan years ago, even if consumers didn't respond to it from them.
As for what Sony is doing, no idea. Guess we'll see.
Nothing was horrific except for the exaggeration and derangement on here. Hellblade 2 is literally the best looking game I've ever seen and it's on S. Starfield is on S. Forza is on S. If you didn't read online discourse, literally the only thing you would have even noticed is that you didn't get local split screen on 1 game. And most people admit the Series S concept would be nearly flawless if it just had a little more RAM. It's pretty easy to make it work. The alternative is going to market with an entry level $700 system and seeing how that affects growth rates in the industry.It was absolutely horrific in terms of handcuffing 1st party developers who could never push the series x to it's limits as they would always have to have the gimp version S at the forefront when it came to resource allocation.
It's still a POS that clearly didn't work alternatively speaking.Nothing was horrific except for the exaggeration and derangement on here. Hellblade 2 is literally the best looking game I've ever seen and it's on S. Starfield is on S. Forza is on S. If you didn't read online discourse, literally the only thing you would have even noticed is that you didn't get local split screen on 1 game. And most people admit the Series S concept would be nearly flawless if it just had a little more RAM. It's pretty easy to make it work. The alternative is going to market with an entry level $700 system and seeing how that affects growth rates in the industry.
Just seeing those names I'm almost 99.99 percent sure it's a console and a handheld.PS6 Series S and PS6 Series X would be the best solution.
The reality is that the Series S strategy was brilliant and it wouldn't surprise me at all if it gets copied. Components aren't coming down and console sales aren't growing. They absolutely will be forced to do it to have any hardware at an entry level price point for casual consumers. You can't demand that the entire physical reality of the component market changes to your whims, but you can ask developers to just spend a little more time optimizing very scalable engines. It's really the only logical play. And it will likely have no disc drive, which everyone saw converted MS customers to digital painlessly in the most enviable way possible. MS was right about all of it when they came up with that gameplan years ago, even if consumers didn't respond to it from them.
As for what Sony is doing, no idea. Guess we'll see.
I'm so down to pay more if it can bring tech that allows for experiences we can't get today. If it's bringing me the same games with just higher res and performance, I'm out. Maybe my expectations are too high, but it's been a boring past few gens with static mechanics underneath a shinier coat of paint.Have been telling people it was going to be fairly expensive
I'm so down to pay more if it can bring tech that allows for experiences we can't get today. If it's bringing me the same games with just higher res and performance, I'm out. Maybe my expectations are too high, but it's been a boring past few gens with static mechanics underneath a shinier coat of paint.
Edit: I speak with some hyperbole, as of course there have been games that I have enjoyed
That's one angle. But doubt they're copying that train wreck.So copying Microsoft yet again
![]()
Of course when Sony does it, it'll be genius...
Can't help but think the reason behind this would be the higher end consoles are going to be so obnoxiously expensive this is the only way they will sell through the number of overall consoles they need for their ecosystems... sigh.
PS6 S
The reviews are in:
"Doesn't hold back development even a little bit."
"I didn't even notice the lack of disc drive."
Right, it's a brilliant idea to copy the loser's strategyPS6 Series S and PS6 Series X would be the best solution.
Won't a handheld hold it back even more?The low end console will just hold the high end console back. It is known.
Yes the two SoCs I mentioned in that thread are for PS6.
Not if it's not CPU and memory starved it wouldn't. Much easier to lower graphic settings than mess with game logic. That's the main problem with the series S and why devs struggle to get feature parity with the main console.Won't a handheld hold it back even more?
Imagine if PS5 Pro was released in 2020 for $999 alongside PS5 for $499.
That's probably what they will do with PS6 and PS6 Pro.
Xbox strategy failed because of Series S low RAM and the fact everyone targeting PS5 as a baseBullshit, the reason why Sony does mid-gen is that technology evolves in 4 years
Even if you release a $3000 console, it will be obsolete 4 years later
That's how technology works
And that's why Xbox strategy with two consoles failed big time
To be honest to me it's difficult to take seriously any portable consoles except Switch.The handheld space has been really hot for the past few years so a home console + handheld 1-2 punch for next-gen makes the most sense IMO.
Xbox strategy failed because of Series S low RAM and the fact everyone targeting PS5 as a base