Chrono said:Ok this thread is HUGE and sorry if this was already answered - will the games be $60?
jett said::lol HOLY SHIT those accesories are damn fucking expensive. What the shit is MS thinking, $50+tax for a controller?? I guess since they've increased game prices by $10, they might as well go all the way. I'm not liking the "HD-era" so far.
so when Square said (paraphrase) "we are making a X360 version , but we can't make a PS3 version because they aren't supporting a HDD as standard" they were just fibbing?"not one game can support the hard drive as a primary function. Games must work without the hard drive no matter what. You can optimise a game for the hard drive if it's attached.
Considering this was in the basic specs as of... oh... over a year ago....
a) Square isn't going "oh shit!" because their game won't require an install this time.
b) it's not fracturing the userbase. All games will be played as normal without a hard drive. increased loadtimes will result with a bunch of games if you have one.
that is all."
jett said::lol HOLY SHIT those accesories are damn fucking expensive. What the shit is MS thinking, $50+tax for a controller?? I guess since they've increased game prices by $10, they might as well go all the way. I'm not liking the "HD-era" so far.
DCharlie said:the biggest thing that sticks with me at the moment (other than calling some one dick face , then having them call me dickface back twice, which was pretty useless) is that Square must be thinking "... err... what the fuck?"
Well done MS! get Square at least on board, then fragment the userbase!
One thing today proves - whoever is running the show at MS is so out of touch with what they need to do that they are making it very difficult for anyone to take them seriously.
Seriously, i think they'd be hard pressed to get any random poster on this board to come up with worse ideas!
$399 full pack for 6 months until the PS3 launches and then drop it to $299? Whats the point??? ONE SKU at $299 from the off - swallow 6 months extra loss (because contrary to popular belief , the share price won't move significantly + it would yeild a much better possition in the console market). Clueless to the end - at this point in time they deserve a good slapping.
MS:
I am available for hire - i live in Japan - and i can HELP YOU.
Seriously, how much WORSE can it be for you?
Redbeard said:Shouldn't you be blaming publishers for higher game prices?
No, no. That would make too much sense.
You are absolutely 100% wrong. FFXI will only run with a HDD. There is no way in hell it could be run off DVD. Methinks it could be preinstalled on the HDD at launch thoughDopeyFish said:a) Square isn't going "oh shit!" because their game won't require an install this time.
DopeyFish said:not one game can support the hard drive as a primary function. Games must work without the hard drive no matter what. You can optimise a game for the hard drive if it's attached.
Considering this was in the basic specs as of... oh... over a year ago....
a) Square isn't going "oh shit!" because their game won't require an install this time.
b) it's not fracturing the userbase. All games will be played as normal without a hard drive. increased loadtimes will result with a bunch of games if you have one.
that is all.
I agree. Something must have changed. I can see it now. FF11 360 package with a huge "REQUIRES HARD DRIVE TO PLAY" sticker on it.DCharlie said:so when Square said (paraphrase) "we are making a X360 version , but we can't make a PS3 version because they aren't supporting a HDD as standard" they were just fibbing?
I'm sure you are right and they must have knew something, but man.... something doesn't smell right.
DopeyFish said:a) Square isn't going "oh shit!" because their game won't require an install this time.
b) it's not fracturing the userbase. All games will be played as normal without a hard drive. increased loadtimes will result with a bunch of games if you have one.
agreed - if the $299 SKU didn't exist, then i think things would look much better."while I agree about the general incompetence, I don't agree with your suggestion. They should have kept the $399 tag for the premium pack, bigged up all the stuff you get, then dropped to $299 for PS3 launch.
The early adopters will pay it anyway, so no point getting hit for the extra $100.
Its the dual SKUs and fragmented userbase thats dumb. Still, they probably expected to strip the HDD later on to help keep price competitive with Sony, so they'd still have to mandate no required HDD usage.
If they'd have guaranteed it, Sony could have made it optional and therefore have a price movement advantage. Problem for MS moving first."
Mrbob said:Doesn't matter. It still goes against what MS has been preaching for months. They could at least include component cables in the box too.
Like I've mentioned before it isn't the hardware price that bugs me. It's the split skus and the peripheral prices and game prices.
Finally, Xbox 360 lets you control a new world of digital entertainment. So you can listen to your own play lists while you play all your games, and jack in your MP3 player, digital camera, and Windows XP PC to play your music, photos, and TV shows through your home entertainment system. Plus it lets you stream high definition TV and movies stored on Windows Media Center Edition PCs starting this Christmas.
DarienA said:And it won't get updates?
I think the definition of fracturing the userbase seems to have changed...
Pimpbaa said:I don't need any of the premium package stuff. My plans haven't changed, I'm just gonna get the core package.
I have three words for you my friend:Jonnyram said:Starting off with $399 and dropping to $299 less than a year later?
SATURN, ANYONE!?
Bad idea.
Good in theory, but it leaves a bad taste in early adopters' mouths. Especially those that buy on credit.
Jonnyram said:Starting off with $399 and dropping to $299 less than a year later?
SATURN, ANYONE!?
Bad idea.
Good in theory, but it leaves a bad taste in early adopters' mouths. Especially those that buy on credit.
IJoel said:To fracture this discussion, did you guys notice the $99 price for the damn wireless adapter? I bought a $30 USB wireless adapter for my PC. I think I'm more baffled at the ridiculousness of that price than anything else. It's a massive rip off. Not to mention, a $99 20GB Hard Disk. It's like they're charging us for their past sins on Xbox.
DopeyFish said:Xbox dropped in price in even less time. *scratches head*
mrklaw said:thats the beauty of the way MS have priced it. You can be happy thinking 'core system', 'core system'. But you'll need a memory card at least ($40!). So now you're $340. For only $60, the price of one game, you could instead have a nice big HDD for save games/soundtracks; wireless controller etc.
DCharlie said:agreed - if the $299 SKU didn't exist, then i think things would look much better.
the only part of the battle left unclear is what Sony will do - there are a lot of assumptions floating around, and only an official announcement will solve the mystery.
note : $100 hit per unit for MS? do they REALLY give a shit? i mean... seriously?
TTP said:Any news about japanese prices?
And, do we know the exact launch dates?
That's how much just about all wireless console adpapters cost right now. At least ones that work well.IJoel said:To fracture this discussion, did you guys notice the $99 price for the damn wireless adapter?
The pricing is fine, it's the non-HDD el cheapo SKU that's bad.MightyHedgehog said:As for the rest of this thread...while I'm not happy with the pricing, I don't think it's that bad.
Jonnyram said:The pricing is fine, it's the non-HDD el cheapo SKU that's bad.
DopeyFish said:Live headset will work. Video cables from xbox won't work (different connecter)
DopeyFish said:No hub/router required for system linking. sick.
IJoel said:To fracture this discussion, did you guys notice the $99 price for the damn wireless adapter? I bought a $30 USB wireless adapter for my PC. I think I'm more baffled at the ridiculousness of that price than anything else. It's a massive rip off. Not to mention, a $99 20GB Hard Disk. It's like they're charging us for their past sins on Xbox.
dopeyfish = bernie stolarKabuki Waq said:anyone else get the feeling dopeyfish works for MS or something?
Hmm ok... since I don't know how big the updates are that Square has been pushing I'll drop that.DopeyFish said:Updates will be sent to your memory card or hard drive. Since LIVE is required to play (Silver or Gold) you still need a memory card.
fracturing the userbase = this game will only if you have this feature. You aren't fracturing the userbase by alleviating loadtimes. The games will run the same after loading with or without the hard drive.
DopeyFish said:i'll be buying two for the simple reason of it having Ad-hoc. No hub/router required for system linking. sick.
DopeyFish said:i'll be buying two for the simple reason of it having Ad-hoc. No hub/router required for system linking. sick.
The End said:If Sony was really smart, they'd include a ~30gig hard drive in every launch unit at, say, $350, but with the stipulation that no individual game use more than, say, a gig of swap space, so that later on, they replace the HD with 2 gigs of flash memory once it's economic to do so.
(flash memory scales down in price a lot better than HDs do).
cyberheater said:Here's a question for yer...
Will Xbox360 still be backward compatible if it doesn't have a harddrive?
Amir0x said:What, so Sony could lose 250 per unit?
That's not true, the big pack is not cheap but is not expensive either. Just the headset and the remote make the price.teiresias said:The only reason the $399 SKU can even be considered a "deal" is because MS is raping you on peripheral pricing. Hardly a "deal" in that context . . . that said Sony will do the same thing.
Kabuki Waq said:psyborgs should be worried as well i mean do you think Sony will be cheaper in any aspect?