4nm? Nintendo using TSMC's 4nm? Nintendo? 4nm? NINTENDO?!
Not really what I said (or think).Yeah, you're really misguided if you think that people are only playing Mario Kart and Pokemon on their Nintendo Switch.
No such thing as only having single precision. Every GPU can do all three. Half(16), single(32) and double(64).
Anyways, it doesn't matter.I am just saying, from a power and cost perspective, and this being Nintendo, you are not getting a PS4 (1.8TF) GPU in a Switch 2. It could be a 1TF GPu that performs better than a PS4... I dunno, but let's see.
No DLSS?
Ps5 is out selling switch this year. Ps4 sold 117 million. Switch selling 150 million Is not kicking the living crap out of it lol
Switch 2 is not gonna have the covid and free money boost in its prime.
Lol I remember the Wii U speculation with some vague mumbling on being based on the Power7 chip...Turned out to be that old 750 from the iMac G3, glued in three and given an eDRAM L2 cache. And then the GPU thread and the slow dawning realization that it was lower than anyone had imagined for the year at 160 shaders and 172 Gflops, launching so close to the PS4.It never fails. Wiiu insiders saying it's 3 x 360 and switch suppose to be between half the power of ps4 lol.
Eh, everything can be faked, details can be wrong, misunderstandings happen and until I see this particular chip inside the next Nintendo console I don't believe they will use it.What is it about it that you don't believe? You think Nvidia just pretended to be hacked?
Those 2 came out in 2013 and 2016. Been quite a while now. Series S is 4tf and came out 2020 is smaller and quiet, 4 years after the Pro. Switch is rumoured to come out 2024. So it's very possible.Fake news. The battery is going to limit the performance. PS4 and PS4 pros were literal jet engines.
I could see them going with memory that is slightly faster bandwidth than launch XBONE.
The series s is not constrained by a portable batteryThose 2 came out in 2013 and 2016. Been quite a while now. Series S is 4tf and came out 2020 is smaller and quiet, 4 years after the Pro. Switch is rumoured to come out 2024. So it's very possible.
Very on point for NintendoI’m expecting about .8 tflops handheldd and 1.6 tflops docked. So about 4x the current Switch. Then dlss 2.1
I’d be very happy with that
That, and they can actually 'anticipate the demand'.I’ll believe it when I see it. Also I hope Nintendo can got from a successful switch to a sequel and they break the curse they always seem to have.
Yawn. We are on the cusp of a PS5 pro and already have a 12tf XSX. Get current Nintendo, have some balls.
With games that are 2+ generations ahead. It's not for whining pussiesAnother generation behind...
yeah with the Wii U they spent their money on the Gamepad. With the 3ds they spent it on 3d and continued the dual screens.Lol I remember the Wii U speculation with some vague mumbling on being based on the Power7 chip...Turned out to be that old 750 from the iMac G3, glued in three and given an eDRAM L2 cache. And then the GPU thread and the slow dawning realization that it was lower than anyone had imagined for the year at 160 shaders and 172 Gflops, launching so close to the PS4.
WiiU "Latte" GPU Die Photo - GPU Feature Set And Power Analysis
Full-size photo here (very big) A version of the die photo with each of the components outlined and labelled: What's going on here? A few days ago, wsippel noticed that Chipworks had Wii U die photos up for sale on their website, and at $200 a piece (for each of the CPU, GPU and NOR dies)...www.neogaf.com
Expect lower with Nintendo so you don't get disappointed...
Ask Sony how they are doing. Balls dwarf Nintendo, like mine dwarf yours.Switch lifetime sales: 125 million.
ToTK sales: 18.5 million.
Nintendo 1.3 billion last quarter profit.
You'd kill to have balls that big.
I don't think Nvidia would fake their own files so we know that at least at one point Nvidia was working on this chip for Nintendo. Plans could have changed in the last few years of course.Eh, everything can be faked, details can be wrong, misunderstandings happen and until I see this particular chip inside the next Nintendo console I don't believe they will use it.
Yes, and I don't believe it.
This info was posted here in June 2021.Lots of people here are talking out of their ass, but the specs aren't really crazy. They're good. And they've been known since March 2022 and the Nvidia hack but GAF is late, as often.
I’m expecting about .8 tflops handheldd and 1.6 tflops docked. So about 4x the current Switch. Then dlss 2.1
I’d be very happy with that
This info was posted here in June 2021.
Great points. It will be day one no matter what. Switch has been the best console for years and I'm even counting current gen. Best games hands down for me. Exclusives are amazing. Great hardware and portable.
The magic they deliver with their art design is top tier. It would be nice to have ps4 performance before dlss, as Nintendo could make some mind blowing titles on that.
That was posted here in March 2022.The name was known (though with an error as people believed the code name would be Dane instead of Drake), but the specs were only known after the hack. Which not only confirmed the previous leaks but offered almost all relevant info about the chip. And that occurred in March 2022.
I don't think console users will be meithered tbh..Nintendo were doing there own thing time ago. As long as the consoles get the games, everything else is secondary.Eh. Switch 1 is still kicking the living crap out of every console on the market. ( aside from few months here and there ) Switch 2 is just gonna destroy them if they can keep up with the demand.
its not like the other consoles won't exist in the market because of course they will do. but sales wise ? yeah its not gonna be pretty
It's almost inconceivable for a TSMC N4 chip to run at 500Mhz and 1Ghz. The Z1 Extreme GPU on the same node can boost to 2.8Ghz and runs full time sustained at 2.2 - 2.4Ghz, and that's while being hamstrung by a wildly inefficient and overpowered CPU cluster stealing all the power and heat. This would be an almost criminal waste of money and manufacturing capacity, they'd be infinitely better off with N7 or 8N if they want clocks that low. A larger battery would cost a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the price premium they'd be paying for N4
^^Getting a little carried away...
The t234 produces 4Tflops, around the PS4 Pro, at 50 watts. The total Switch running zelda uses 11 watts when charged
Nvidia Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU vs Nvidia Tegra Orin T234 GPU
Comparison between Nvidia Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU and Nvidia Tegra Orin T234 GPU with the specifications of the graphics cards, the number of execution units, ...gadgetversus.com
Playing With Power: A Look At Nintendo Switch Power Consumption
www.anandtech.com
If the customized chip is based on it, it will be very downclocked. I'd be happy if it even hit 2Tflops because power needs to drop by a lot. I'd expect close to base PS4, not PS4 Pro.
^^
It has to drop a lot of power to fit in a Switch like form factor. At a larger node it would fare even worse, that doesn't make sense.
...The Z1 Extreme (Rog Ally) is the same form factor on the same node. No Nintendo's not going run at 25+ watts in portable mode like the Ally, but 500Ghz is significantly lower than even the Ally's "sleep mode" clock which idles on a blank desktop at 800Mhz. 1ghz docked is even more ridiculous.
Ask Sony how they are doing. Balls dwarf Nintendo, like mine dwarf yours.
Keep them low is probably the outcome ..While I can't find a comparison to the Ally directly, and it is more svelte than the Steam Deck, it also has fancier cooling and while these are comparable form factors, they're not really in comparable cooling and battery sizes
We're also comparing across not just GPU architectures but different GPU companies completely, where RDNA3 does chase higher clocks. I would also hazard a guess that none of these have sleep battery time like the Switch then?
We need to keep in mind how much Nintendo underclocked even the Tegra X1 in portable mode...I think higher expectations are going to be let down. Keep em low and be pleasantly surprised.
Getting a little carried away...
The t234 produces 4Tflops, around the PS4 Pro, at 50 watts. The total Switch running zelda uses 11 watts when charged
Nvidia Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU vs Nvidia Tegra Orin T234 GPU
Comparison between Nvidia Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU and Nvidia Tegra Orin T234 GPU with the specifications of the graphics cards, the number of execution units, ...gadgetversus.com
Playing With Power: A Look At Nintendo Switch Power Consumption
www.anandtech.com
If the customized chip is based on it, it will be very downclocked. I'd be happy if it even hit 2Tflops because power needs to drop by a lot. I'd expect close to base PS4, not PS4 Pro.
While I can't find a comparison to the Ally directly, and it is more svelte than the Steam Deck, it also has fancier cooling and while these are comparable form factors, they're not really in comparable cooling and battery sizes
We're also comparing across not just GPU architectures but different GPU companies completely, where RDNA3 does chase higher clocks. I would also hazard a guess that none of these have sleep battery time like the Switch then?
We need to keep in mind how much Nintendo underclocked even the Tegra X1 in portable mode...I think higher expectations are going to be let down. Keep em low and be pleasantly surprised.
All I'm saying is that I don't believe that whatever chip ends up in the next Switch, will have PS4 pro performance, or DLSS. Regardless of hacks, leaks and what Nvidia have been working on.There's nothing to "believe", it's literally hack.
What if.... What if Covid 2 is also released at launch ?Ps5 is out selling switch this year. Ps4 sold 117 million. Switch selling 150 million Is not kicking the living crap out of it lol
Switch 2 is not gonna have the covid and free money boost in its prime.