• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Let's Read 'The Fellowship of the Ring' - Presented By TolkienGAF (Join Us!)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Loxley

Member
Greetings NeoGAF, and welcome to TolkienGAF's second read-through thread! This time around we will be reading, discussing and analyzing The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring!

LHmrCbl.jpg


Last year we attempted to do a community reading for The Silmariillion. We started off very strong, but as the weeks passed by it became more and more obvious that a book as dense as The Silmarillion simply didn't lend itself to a weekly-style discussion format. It also simply went on for far too long to maintain everyone's attention (five months, and we didn't even make it half-way through).

So one key difference this time around - aside from the fact that The Lord of the Rings is a much easier and linear read than The Silmarillion - is that this time we have a set schedule laid out from the get-go. This read-through will take place over the course of seven weeks, focusing on three new chapters every week. The reading will begin this Monday, May 11th and will end on the week of June 22nd.

GAF's Tolkien scholar Edmond Dantès was kind enough to lay out a neat schedule for us:

Book 1:

Week one: May 11th - 17th
A Long-expected Party
The Shadow of the Past
Three is Company

Week two: May 18th - 24th
A Short Cut to Mushrooms
A Conspiracy Unmasked
The Old Forest

Week three: May 25th - 31st
In the House of Tom Bombadil
Fog on the Barrow-downs
At the Sign of the Prancing Pony

Week four: June 1st - 7th
Strider
A Knife in the Dark
Flight to the Ford

Book 2:

Week five: June 8th - 15th
Many Meetings
The Council of Elrond
The Ring goes South

Week six: June 16th - 21st
A Journey in the Dark
The Bridge of Khazad-dûm
Lothlórien

Week seven: June 22nd - 28th
The Mirror of Galadriel
Farewell to Lórien
The Great River
The Breaking of the Fellowship

FAQ:

Remind me, how long will this thing go for?
Seven weeks total. Three chapters a week starting next Monday, May 11th and finishing the week of June 22nd.

Are you also going to read The Two Towers and The Return of the King?
For now we're just going to keep things tight and focus on The Fellowship of the Ring. TTT and ROTK could potentially happen down the road depending on how well this goes.

What version of The Fellowship of the Ring should I read if I want to participate?
Almost literally any version out there will do just fine.

Are we allowed to discuss the Peter Jackson and Ralph Bakshi film adaptions in relation to the book?
Absolutely! Many of us will be using the movies as a point of comparison as we progress, seeing as they were the entry point into Tolkien's works for many people. But other artistic interpretations of Fellowship can also be brought into the discussion as well.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Recommended (optional) supplemental material:

The History of the The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the Shadow by Christopher Tolkien

Vs6hBPV.jpg


The Return of the Shadow is the first volume of of the The History of The Lord of the Rings and the sixth volume of The History of Middle-earth. It is a history of the creation of The Lord of the Rings, a fascinating study of Tolkien's great masterpiece, from its inception to the end of the first volume, The Fellowship of the Ring. In The Return of the Shadow (the abandoned title of the first volume of The Lord of the Rings) we see how Bilbo's 'magic' ring evolved into the supremely dangerous Ruling Ring of the Dark Lord; and the precise, and astonishingly unforeseen, moment when a Black Rider first rode into the Shire. The character of the hobbit called Trotter (afterwards Strider or Aragorn) is developed, though his true identity seems to be an insoluble problem. Frodo's companions undergo many changes of name and personality; and other major figures appear in unfamiliar guises: a sinister Treebeard, in league with the Enemy, and a ferocious, malevolent Farmer Maggot. This book comes complete with reproductions of the first maps and facsimile pages from the earlier manuscripts.

Tolkien: A Dictionary by David Day

BQjoJXn.jpg


From the author, David Day: "J.R.R. Tolkien is the father of modern fantasy. He created characters and a world so rich with details—and so unique—that it warranted a whole new vocabulary along with it. His creation of language is not surprising, considering his first civilian job following his service during World War I was working on the Oxford English Dictionary. Inside, you’ll find a chronology of Tolkien’s life, along with a short biography and an explanation of his writings. Then flip through the dictionary to discover terms like Aglarond, the great caverns beneath Helm’s Deep, or the Black Riders and the mystery surrounding them—among many other terms. This companion serves as a terrific resource for all those in love with Middle Earth and its inhabitants."


The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring feature film adaption (2001):

kCYPza6.jpg


The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is the first film of the three-part Lord of the Rings film adaption series directed by Peter Jackson and produced by New Line Cinema/Warner Bros. The film retells the adventures of the book of the same name, taking its story from the first part, The Fellowship of the Ring as well as the first chapter of The Two Towers.

It was produced as the first of three films, filmed simultaneously on location in New Zealand with a budget of U.S. $180 million. Released on 10 December 2001, the film was highly acclaimed by critics and fans alike who considered it to be a landmark in film-making and an achievement in the fantasy film genre. It has continued to be featured on critic lists of the greatest fantasy films ever made. The film was a massive box office success, earning over $871 million worldwide, and becoming the second highest-grossing film of 2001 in the U.S. and worldwide (behind Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone).
 

Garryk

Member
Subbed. I bought all of the kindle copies over Christmas when they were $3 each. This will be my first complete read-through! :3
 
I'm in. I enjoyed lurking in the Silmarillion discussion, and it's been too long since I've re-read the LOTR books. I've ready them about 10 times, but the last read through was probably over a decade ago. Can't wait to dive back into some of my favorite books.
 

bengraven

Member
Still have a digital copy that has never been opened from when I got my first Kindle. Trilogy compilation was 6 bucks that day.
 

898

Member
I'm in but I said I was in with Silmarillion and that didn't go anywhere so...
Hopefully I'll have more time.
 

Daft Bird

Member
I'll try to be in it. My copy of lord of the rings isn't with me, so I'll have buy a new one or hope I get to go home and grab it.
 

terrisus

Member
Are we allowed to discuss the Peter Jackson and Ralph Bakshi film adaptions in relation to the book?

Don't forget:

hqMzjWV.jpg


Rankin/Bass Return of the King


Seriously though, as you know, I listened through (since my vision is horrible as a result of my stroke) The Lord of the Rings last year.

I was listening through The Silmarillion as well, but had to stop, since the memories it evoked were just far too depressing for me to deal with (a better time and place, so many different choices that I should have made, etc. Won't clog this thread up with too much).

So, not sure if I have it in me to give it another go now...
If I do, is there too much prejudice against using an audiobook version?... >.>
 

Loxley

Member
Seriously though, as you know, I listened through (since my vision is horrible as a result of my stroke) The Lord of the Rings last year.

I was listening through The Silmarillion as well, but had to stop, since the memories it evoked were just far too depressing for me to deal with (a better time and place, so many different choices that I should have made, etc. Won't clog this thread up with too much).

So, not sure if I have it in me to give it another go now...
If I do, is there too much prejudice against using an audiobook version?... >.>

Not at all man, an audiobook will serve you just as well.
 
Oh man, I just finished LoTR a week ago and started reading Silmarillion. Akward timing for me, but maybe I can still contribute a bit based on memory.
 

terrisus

Member
Not at all man, an audiobook will serve you just as well.

Thanks =)

Seriously though, I feel bad doing audiobooks...
They feel like "cheating" >.>

I never used them before my stroke...
But, I would hardly get any enjoyment reading in otherwise now =(
 
Would have loved to join in, but all of my university assignments are due in over the next couple of weeks so I just won't have time. Will definitely join in if you guys continue onto The Two Towers!
 
I'm in, as I recently started reading, and wouldn't mind a read-along to keep me going. I'll be using the all-in-one Kindle version of The Lord of the Rings.
 
This will be my first read through of Lord of the Rings in 14 years. I'm excited to pick up on things I missed. That Christopher Tolkein book is probably going to help discussion quite a bit, I'll pick it up at my local library.
 

Loxley

Member
This will be my first read through of Lord of the Rings in 14 years. I'm excited to pick up on things I missed. That Christopher Tolkein book is probably going to help discussion quite a bit, I'll pick it up at my local library.

It's definitely a great companion piece to The Lord of the Rings, I highly recommend it.
 
Great idea!

My little brother bought me the LOTR trilogy for Christmas in 2013 and I sadly never got around reading them.

This thread will actually motivate me. Count me in!
 
It's a slog. I've read it every other year going on 25 years.

A conversation then 2 pages of history followed by a reply. Exhausting.

I think I'll read it again.
 
Count me in!

Every summer I pick on Tolkien book to read and read it. So instead of waiting for Summer, i'll start now and this will be the book.
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
Thanks for putting the thread up Loxley.

The following is something that should enlighten new and veteran readers alike:
The Lord of the Rings, Le Seigneur des Anneaux, El Señor de los Anillos, Kryezoti i Unazave, Sayyid al-Khawatim, Eraztunen Jauna, Sarbadhipoti Angti, Mo Jie, La Mastro de l’Ringoj… in over 50 languages, images engraved in the readers' mind come to life with these words: Frodo and Sam climbing Mount Orodruin in order to destroy Sauron’s ring, which they had brought from the Shire to Mordor at the risk of their lives; Gollum on the steps of Cirith Ungol; the fight with Shelob, or the battle on Weathertop ; the farewell to Lórien, or Éowyn’s grief at losing Aragorn; Tom Bombadil’s peacefulness and the solace to be found in Bag End.

Those who have not read the book know it by hearsay as an object of affection for its readers, as ‘an absolute must-read’ – sometimes even as ‘the book of the 20th century’. In any case, as a book that has given rise to a thousand contradictory, sometimes controversial interpretations: for some, a novel in praise of freedom and nature – so much so that it became an object of worship for American students in the 1960’s –; for others, an idealised expression of nostalgia for the Middle Ages; or a reflection of the last century; or even, for some who are less well-informed of Tolkien’s intentions, a mirror of World War II.

As a peculiar romance (in the original meaning of the word), a 1000-page book that is a world in itself, The Lord of the Rings has been subject to numerous readings and interpretations, and over-simplifications: its connections to war and heroism, the place of women in the plot, the relationships between the peoples of Middle-earth... It is interesting therefore to get past the ‘mythical’ aura of the ‘cult’ writer (two words that would certainly have displeased the author) in order to return to the text and consider the complex genesis of this novel.

Do all readers know that The Lord of the Rings was originally requested by the publisher, who wanted ‘more hobbits’, and that it was supposed to relate just a short, new adventure of Bilbo’s? That Strider – first called Trotter – was originally just a hobbit among others? Or that the story could have started with a conversation between Gandalf and Bingo in Bag End?

Pleased by the unexpected success of The Hobbit in 1937, but refusing to publish 'The Silmarillion', Allen & Unwin asked J.R.R. Tolkien for a ‘sequel’, which the latter started writing in December of the same year.

First of all, Tolkien had trouble in finding the main line of this ‘new story about Hobbits’. As he admitted to his publisher, ‘Not ever intending any sequel, I fear I squandered all my favourite ‘motifs’ and characters on the original Hobbit’, 'it is difficult to find anything new in that world’. A few months later, and after having written several openings to the story – including the conversation between Gandalf and ‘Bingo Bolger-Baggins’, which was to develop into the chapter entitled ‘The Shadow of the Past’ –, Tolkien gave up on the idea of planning out in advance the main thread of the story. Letting the plot ‘[open] out in unexpected ways’ led him to forsake the universe of the Shire, this world of hobbits – whom he could untiringly contemplate ‘eating and making their rather fatuous jokes indefinitely’ – in order to go deeper into an epic, more complex tale; a darker one, also. And then a title appeared: The Lord of the Ring… (Note: only one Ring at this stage).

Should he contrive an attack on the Shire by a dragon? Have the hero travel to some island? Fit Tom Bombadil and Old Man Willow (who had already been created) into the story? Make use of Bilbo’s ring by linking it to the character of the Necromancer, who was only hinted at in The Hobbit, to give the plot it second wind? Tolkien considered having Bilbo depart again and also marrying him to Primula Brandybuck; all this before the emergence of a son named Bingo, who then became Bilbo’s nephew (or rather his cousin) and finally his adopted son! As to the name Frodo, it shifted from one character to another.

The two pages entitled ‘Queries and Alterations’, edited by Christopher Tolkien in the sixth volume of The History of Middle-earth (The Return of The Shadow), show the many questions that arose during the writing process: how many hobbits were needed? Should there be Men attending the party in the Shire? What should be the hero's name? And what was to be done with the character of Trotter? Also in these notes Sam appeared without warning...

A year later, Tolkien had reached chapter XII, and thought his manuscript might be 500 pages long. But the writing could take place only during time ‘stolen’ from academic tasks that grew more numerous during the war. Those years were troubled not only by overwork, but also by recurrent health problems, both for Tolkien and his wife Edith; by financial difficulties, as well as the worldwide conflict, which closely affected him, including involvement in the protection of Oxford. For instance, the scarcity and poor quality of paper during wartime made writing such a long manuscript all the more difficult, and the author would often have no choice but to write whole chapters of his book on the back of examination papers.

Five years later, in 1942, Tolkien had only reached chapter XXXI (about half of the book in its final form), and struggled to keep the pace and consistency of a tale that no longer had anything to with its first drafts. He conceived the Appendices for this purpose, to record all the elements that might slow down the main plot, but which remained essential to him: historical annals, alphabets and languages, genealogical trees.

Tolkien would usually jot down a few ideas about the main outlines of a chapter, along with precise formulations; then he would develop them before making a clean, typewritten copy of the whole. But the work did not stop there: on some typewritten pages, there are no fewer than five different colours, each marking a separate stage of emendation.

Another difficulty was to keep a consistent chronology, as his characters – scattered about Middle Earth – moved between Gondor, Rohan, Mordor… He also had to match the sequence of the story with the maps that he had been redrafting over the years: there are no fewer than 6 of them just for the Shire.

During this time, Tolkien published a few short texts: Leaf, by Niggle and The Lay of Aotrou and Itroun, in 1945, as well as Farmer Giles of Ham (1949). As to the creation of The Lord of the Rings, he arrived at its conclusion after 17 years, at the cost of ‘immense pains’, as Christopher Tolkien put it. Only in 1954 was the first part published, entitled The Fellowship of the Ring, followed by The Two Towers and The Return of the King, in 1955. The book was so large that, for material reasons, it came out in 3 volumes and this is why it has been ever since wrongly considered as a ‘trilogy’.

The high price of paper and fabrication costs in the blighted post-war period also meant abandoning the facsimiles of the ‘burnt’ pages of the book of Mazarbul created by the author; only the maps and Appendices were retained. Even so, the publisher expected to lose hundreds of pounds on this work, which was for him that of a "genius".

Thus came the completion of a long creative process, witnessed only by very few to whom fragments of The Lord of the Rings had been read: first and foremost his son Christopher – who read a major part of it in serial form while training as a fighter pilot during the Second World War – as well as his friends The Inklings, chief among them C.S. Lewis. Written with friends and relatives in mind, and intended to ‘move’ and ‘delight’ readers of The Hobbit (who had grown up in the mean time), The Lord of the Rings was also a tribute to Tolkien’s companions who were killed during the First World War, especially his two very close friends Robert Gilson and Geoffrey Smith.

The book is thus the result of a publisher's request but also a very personal work, as can be seen in the way Tolkien – who had been urged to favour the universe of The Hobbit, was he himself ‘attracted’ towards the universe of the ‘Silmarillion’, which he had been carrying for over twenty years when he started writing The Lord of the Rings.

A noteworthy paradox therefore: in 1937, wishing to pursue the success of The Hobbit, Allen & Unwin declined Tolkien’s proposal to publish ‘The Silmarillion’. But this ‘sequel’, the ‘new Hobbit’ that The Lord of the Rings was supposed to be, moved away from the originally requested story, as it traveled back towards the ‘mythology and legends of the Elder Days’ of the ‘Silmarillion’ itself.

Decades later, Christopher Tolkien edited these rejected versions: the Lay of Leithian and the Quenta Silmarillion – in The Lays of Beleriand and in The Shaping of Middle-earth, two of the volumes composing The History of Middle-earth. This series of twelve works also follows step by step the genesis of The Lord of the Rings, through four volumes (The Return of the Shadow, The Treason of Isengard, The War of the Ring and Sauron Defeated). They also reveal how the author built on the languages, Elvish in particular, that he had been creating ever since his youth.

As Tolkien explained in 1966, a few characters, objects and places that were only given a limited scope in The Hobbit (the Necromancer, Elrond), or of which this book had disclosed limited aspects only (Gandalf, the Ring), took on a new dimension in The Lord of the Rings: Elrond, the half-Elven whom we had met in The Hobbit, is thus provided with a prestigious genealogy, becoming the son of Eärendel, and the great-grandson of Beren and Lúthien.

The connection with the former ‘mythology’ is also evident in the author's efforts to have The Lord of the Rings and ‘The Silmarillion’ published together. He even went so far as to approach another publisher, before he was met with another refusal and eventually agreed to let Allen & Unwin publish The Lord of the Rings on its own, proposing a single episode of the history of his invented world, with its geography, languages and peoples. In Tolkien’s mind, ‘The Silmarillion’ should have been published together with The Lord of the Rings. Up to the reader therefore to imagine the cycle of which the author had dreamt, linking the creation of the world and the history of the first Ages as disclosed in The Silmarillion to the vast epic adventure of The Lord of the Rings.

As J.R.R. Tolkien wrote later, ‘I then offered them the legends of the Elder Days, but their readers turned that down. They wanted a sequel [to The Hobbit]. But I wanted heroic legends and high romance. The result was The Lord of the Rings...’
 
Gonna be good. Thanks for the thread. Will keep this on my radar. Might not get round to reading but will deffo look forward to the comments that chime through. Really enjoy the other thread and the lore which supports the books.

Thanks!
 

Loxley

Member
Edmond Dantès;163284895 said:
Thanks for putting the thread up Loxley.

The following is something that should enlighten new and veteran readers alike:

This is a fantastic summary, thanks for posting Dantès!
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
We are course skipping the prologue:

I- Concerning Hobbits
II- Concerning Pipe-Weed
III- Of the Ordering of the Shire
IV- Of the Finding of the Ring
V- Note on the Shire Records


I remember something Brian Sibley once said regarding The Lord of the Rings, he started with the prologue and just couldn't get through it. As an avid reader of The Hobbit, he felt somewhat disappointed. He attempted it again, but this time he skipped the prologue and thus his love affair with The Lord of the Rings began. He went on course to adapt the novel for the much respected BBC radio dramatisation.
 
Edmond Dantès;163333357 said:
We are course skipping the prologue:

I- Concerning Hobbits
II- Concerning Pipe-Weed
III- Of the Ordering of the Shire
IV- Of the Finding of the Ring
V- Note on the Shire Records


I remember something Brian Sibley once said regarding The Lord of the Rings, he started with the prologue and just couldn't get through it. As an avid reader of The Hobbit, he felt somewhat disappointed. He attempted it again, but this time he skipped the prologue and thus his love affair with The Lord of the Rings began. He went on course to adapt the novel for the much respected BBC radio dramatisation.

I read the prologue and since we're still in the interim period of discussion I'll relay some of my thoughts. The forward from my book seems to indicate that Tolkien had quite a few issues with copyright. Apparently an American firm started publishing and collecting the royalties of Tolkien's work without his permission. It bizarrely reminded me of the recent Skyrim mod Steam scandal. I also found it quite touching that he sent book 4 serially to his son, Christopher, while he was in the RAF in Africa to help edit and critique. It must have been quite a comforting thing to get the next bit of LOTR from his father while he was in the war. I was also struck by how poor Tolkien seemed to be. He could not even afford to hire a typist for his finished manuscript and had to do it by hand. Apparently being a respected Oxford professor does not pay that well.

As for the prologue I was struck by two things. One, that the hobbits came from beyond the Misty Mountains and basically consisted of three sub-races; the Hornfoots, Stoor's, and Fallohides. Gollum must have most likely been either a Hornfoot or Stoor (if this is addressed later or in the appendices I haven't read those yet). Also I had a question on Michel Delving. Is he a person? Or the mayor of the Shire? Or is it another name for the Shire itself? It was hard to glean this from the prologue.

One final note I took from the prologue would be a possible time period and setting for a future Middle-Earth movie, The passage on Fornost made me think that a movie concerning the last days of the Kingdom of Fornost and the war with the Witch King of Angmar. Hobbits could feature somewhat prominently in the film as Fornost is surprisingly close to the Shire. I have no knowledge on the Northern Kingdom which seems to be quite an interesting subject.
 

Tambini

Member
Now that I work a lot I don't have as much time for such things as much but i'm gonna try to join you guys, sounds fun!
 

Loxley

Member
I read the prologue and since we're still in the interim period of discussion I'll relay some of my thoughts. The forward from my book seems to indicate that Tolkien had quite a few issues with copyright. Apparently an American firm started publishing and collecting the royalties of Tolkien's work without his permission. It bizarrely reminded me of the recent Skyrim mod Steam scandal. I also found it quite touching that he sent book 4 serially to his son, Christopher, while he was in the RAF in Africa to help edit and critique. It must have been quite a comforting thing to get the next bit of LOTR from his father while he was in the war. I was also struck by how poor Tolkien seemed to be. He could not even afford to hire a typist for his finished manuscript and had to do it by hand. Apparently being a respected Oxford professor does not pay that well.

As for the prologue I was struck by two things. One, that the hobbits came from beyond the Misty Mountains and basically consisted of three sub-races; the Hornfoots, Stoor's, and Fallohides. Gollum must have most likely been either a Hornfoot or Stoor (if this is addressed later or in the appendices I haven't read those yet). Also I had a question on Michel Delving. Is he a person? Or the mayor of the Shire? Or is it another name for the Shire itself? It was hard to glean this from the prologue.

One final note I took from the prologue would be a possible time period and setting for a future Middle-Earth movie, The passage on Fornost made me think that a movie concerning the last days of the Kingdom of Fornost and the war with the Witch King of Angmar. Hobbits could feature somewhat prominently in the film as Fornost is surprisingly close to the Shire. I have no knowledge on the Northern Kingdom which seems to be quite an interesting subject.

Michael Delving was a town within the Westfarthing of the Shire.

Regarding the copyright stuff, yep - an American publisher named Ace Books was taking advantage of a copyright loophole to print unauthorized versions of The Lord of the Rings. In fact one of the editions of The Return of the king that I own is a 1965 officially authorized reprint - which were distributed by Houghton-Mifflin to combat the unauthorized printings. Notice the big "THE AUTHORIZED EDITION" text at the top.


As you can tell by the scotch-tape that the previous owner(s) used to hold the binding together, it's seen better days :lol I love the cover, the color-usage is so liquid 1960's that it's oddly charming.
 

Edmond Dantès

Dantès the White
I read the prologue and since we're still in the interim period of discussion I'll relay some of my thoughts. The forward from my book seems to indicate that Tolkien had quite a few issues with copyright. Apparently an American firm started publishing and collecting the royalties of Tolkien's work without his permission. It bizarrely reminded me of the recent Skyrim mod Steam scandal. I also found it quite touching that he sent book 4 serially to his son, Christopher, while he was in the RAF in Africa to help edit and critique. It must have been quite a comforting thing to get the next bit of LOTR from his father while he was in the war. I was also struck by how poor Tolkien seemed to be. He could not even afford to hire a typist for his finished manuscript and had to do it by hand. Apparently being a respected Oxford professor does not pay that well.

As for the prologue I was struck by two things. One, that the hobbits came from beyond the Misty Mountains and basically consisted of three sub-races; the Hornfoots, Stoor's, and Fallohides. Gollum must have most likely been either a Hornfoot or Stoor (if this is addressed later or in the appendices I haven't read those yet). Also I had a question on Michel Delving. Is he a person? Or the mayor of the Shire? Or is it another name for the Shire itself? It was hard to glean this from the prologue.

One final note I took from the prologue would be a possible time period and setting for a future Middle-Earth movie, The passage on Fornost made me think that a movie concerning the last days of the Kingdom of Fornost and the war with the Witch King of Angmar. Hobbits could feature somewhat prominently in the film as Fornost is surprisingly close to the Shire. I have no knowledge on the Northern Kingdom which seems to be quite an interesting subject.
Tolkien never really was well off in life and debt (tax bill) is the reason he sold the rights to The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit.

Gollum was indeed of Stoor origin, but not really a 'hobbit' as they came to be known. A halfling certainly.

The Fall of the Northern Kingdom would make for an interesting film, more so than an Aragorn origin story.
 
Michael Delving was a town within the Westfarthing of the Shire.

Regarding the copyright stuff, yep - an American publisher named Ace Books was taking advantage of a copyright loophole to print unauthorized versions of The Lord of the Rings. In fact one of the editions of The Return of the king that I own is a 1965 officially authorized reprint - which were distributed by Houghton-Mifflin to combat the unauthorized printings. Notice the big "THE AUTHORIZED EDITION" text at the top.



As you can tell by the scotch-tape that the previous owner(s) used to hold the binding together, it's seen better days :lol I love the cover, the color-usage is so liquid 1960's that it's oddly charming.

Yeah that cover is fantastic. I never really knew about Tolkien's financial trouble, I guess he really didn't reap the benefits of his work at the time of his death correct?
 
I'm totally in! I attempted to read it years ago but, about halfway through, just stopped. Hopefully, this'll give me the motivation to continue on. I'm very much looking forward to the discussion.
 

KadeYuy

Member
I'll be reading the kindle all in one version.

I started and finished the first chapter after getting tired of the prologue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom