Yerd
Member
I think you have that completely backwards. They have extremely low latency.dont know why anyone would want these for playing console games on because they have a bad latency .. even the high end ones..
I think you have that completely backwards. They have extremely low latency.dont know why anyone would want these for playing console games on because they have a bad latency .. even the high end ones..
...What? OLEDs have the fastest pixel refresh and response, it's literally matching single frame on both 60fps and 120fps content.dont know why anyone would want these for playing console games on because they have a bad latency .. even the high end ones..
...What? OLEDs have the fastest pixel refresh and response, it's literally matching single frame on both 60fps and 120fps content.
You should do some research on your tv and find out how to get the proper setup.huh?
I had an OLED LG and it had 'gaming' screen setting. I tried the PS5 on there and the button press had an input lag that was so noticable I couldnt play anything properly. It felt like a second at least. I though that was the norm so I moved the OLED upstairs and got a normal TV for the Ps5..
huh?
I had an OLED LG and it had 'gaming' screen setting. I tried the PS5 on there and the button press had an input lag that was so noticable I couldnt play anything properly. It felt like a second at least. I though that was the norm so I moved the OLED upstairs and got a normal TV for the Ps5..
I get where you're coming from I watch films mainly at night and gaming early afternoons on a Saturday, but with the blinds down. I'm not to keen on my eyes being burnt out of there sockets lol.Why is there an obsession with brightness? I watch everything in total darkness. OLED is bright enough.
A focus on burn in prevention > brightness.
Oh and I'm also sure the brightness will come at a cost at a massive increase in power consumption. For us Europeans this isn't ideal.
Without knowing the window size for that peak, it's a meaningless number.1800 nits on the G3 at peak. According to a LG spokesperson.
What?dont know why anyone would want these for playing console games on because they have a bad latency .. even the high end ones..
It's not "brightness".Why is there an obsession with brightness? I watch everything in total darkness. OLED is bright enough.
A focus on burn in prevention > brightness.
Oh and I'm also sure the brightness will come at a cost at a massive increase in power consumption. For us Europeans this isn't ideal.
I'm not sure I understand this. Isn't this peak brightness and not better range?Once again, it's really not, what you've described is a situation where the nits are rounded up because the HDR range is compressed, under a higher nit display, coming out of the cave would be a smoother transition, where as the top end would only be used for the extremes (such as the sun), everything else will be spread across a higher range creating a more dynamic picture.
gonna be real interesting when microLED hits the market.
excited for 100"+ 8k.
might cost ~$10k but mommy wow, im a big boy now.
Think of it like this....I'm not sure I understand this. Isn't this peak brightness and not better range?
I own one in a south facing room with big fecking windies, i have no issues with it during the day, granted night time viewing is subime but day time viewing isnt an issueThank the lord!
I know that a lot of Gaffers own LG OLEDs and will hear no ill about them but the brightness is currently woeful. This will be a game changer.
Not supposed to sure but when its super nice out its nice to be able to open the sliding windows and listen to the water AND consume media, its just what we enjoy doingYou are not supposed to consume media critically when the sun is shining on the tv.
Roll the blinds or watch at night.
No tv is brighter than a fucking sun lol.
You are indoor. Your eyes accommodated to lower brightness. So it’s fine for a tv. But sun shining from outside is way brighter.
I mean. Sure. I am not telling you what to do.Not supposed to sure but when its super nice out its nice to be able to open the sliding windows and listen to the water AND consume media, its just what we enjoy doing
So if TVs come out with higher peak brightness that helps my wife and I enjoy how we like to consume media than whats the problem if people actually want more peak brightness?
A blanket statement of X number of nits if fine for everyone just simply isn't true and it seems to get under people's skin
I would never tell you how to enjoy how you consume media, whatever works for you is awesome, so I don't understand why people feel the need to tell me I am consuming media wrong
In all honesty through the day I am not looking for the perfect picture I just want a nice set that can overcome my terribly designed roomI mean. Sure. I am not telling you what to do.
Bright nits will overcome reflections but black parts of the image will still be crushed by reflections. So not even 10k nits will help
understandable. I also don' close blinds fully during the day but I rarely do any critical watching during the day.In all honesty through the day I am not looking for the perfect picture I just want a nice set that can overcome my terribly designed room
At night when we watch stuff when we go to bed the C9 is still perfectly fine and still gets plenty bright
In all honesty through the day I am not looking for the perfect picture I just want a nice set that can overcome my terribly designed room
At night when we watch stuff when we go to bed the C9 is still perfectly fine and still gets plenty bright
My main TV for the day is a QN90A then we have the C9 now in the bedroomI'm not sure you'll be able to watch HDR with all the lights on/big windows like you have for a long while, not until the peak brightness is crazy high so when the shadows are lifted to make them visible in your conditions it still has tons of juice to make the mids/highlights even brighter than the elevated shadows.
Does Dolby Vision IQ help at all? Thats part of what its for, to make HDR watchable in bright rooms by doing what I wrote above. You have a ZD9/Z9D right? Thats definitely going to help but still not bright enough really.
My main TV for the day is a QN90A then we have the C9 now in the bedroom
The QN does quite well through the day actually
FINALLY, for those who keep saying "Why do I want a brighter screen, my 800 nits is good enough", here Vincent has done a video explaining what I've been saying in this thread...
I had Grandparents who spent most of their time in a Sunroom they built out back. They asked me to help them find a TV they could see during the day. We went to Sams Club and I asked to turn the sets completely off and chose one that that looked darkest in Off mode in the bright lights of the warehouse. Glossy was quickly ruled out and the sets with a matte looked best. Loss of sharpness but better contrast with the sun shinning in.Nope, love our set up and prefer TVs with higher peak brightness and sorry that seems to bother some that I prefer to not be in a dungeon to watch my TV
Yeah, the deals here i have been previously unseen (and I've been watching)! Lol.I had the same dilemma this time last year when I picked up my 65" C1. I had planned to pick up a C2 on release but it was difficult to argue with the crazy sale prices I was seeing on the C1.
For me the 65" C2 launched in the UK @ £2699. At the same time I managed to find a 65" C1 @ £1350. That was literally half the price of the new model. With the difference I could have purchased all the latest consoles with change or one of the top end soundbars. For me it was a no brainer.
The fact you don't regret buying a qled over a oled says it all. Matte screen over glossy lol.Make the screens semi-matte and I might just regret buying a QLED..