You don't need that much labelling...
Yeah, I'm absolutely sick of labels by this point.
I never really cared for labels. If someone asks about my sexuality, I tell them "I date dudes," and that's the end of the conversation. Easy. No indignant rage, no rants, no lists of terms that 99% of the population don't know the meaning of.
Why don't I like labeling myself? Labels dehumanize. They encourage stereotyping by clumping an entire social group into one word. Most importantly, labels mean different things to different people. To some fundamentalists, bisexuality may not be considered a 'real' orientation -- they would consider any person with an attraction to the same sex to be a homosexual. To an average person, 'gay' could come with the implication that you have no attraction to the same sex whatsoever. To homosexuals? I've read five-page long definitions of what they think the words mean, complete with corresponding kinsey scale numbers.
I'm rather sick of labels, myself. So I relate there, in fact I never did like them to begin with. Though it certainly seemed like the thing to do. I guess they serve a purpose? I'm a bit confused. I don't really know what to think of it all anymore.
Furthermore, why do they think it's okay to add their fetishes and preferences (furry, polygamy, etc) to the struggle for gay rights? Are they attempting to belittle the LGBT rights movement by tacking their ridiculous problems such as otherkin acceptance onto serious issues like trans acceptance and the legalization of gay marriage?
I am guessing stuff like Polyamory is in there for the same sorts of reasons that things have gone from stuff like just "gay" and the "homophile movement" to stuff like LGBT.
People are trying to create an encompassing movement which challenges everything they find wrong with the gender and sexuality status quo. It turns out things like Polygamy and Polyamory do just that.
Eugh. I've somehow, in my group of LGBT friends, become affiliated with some "Social Justice Warrior" types.
One hundred percent straight, white, and cisgendered, all from affluent backgrounds, and none of them will shut the fuck up about how hard it is for them to "deny traditional gender roles."
Hey, social justice types can be good. And gender roles do kind of suck. Straight allies are very much welcome and needed. And I'd rather take an overzealous pro-LGBT straight person over a self hating homophobic gay friend anyday.
And as least social justice types are trying to affect society instead of only trying to change fictional video game worlds and drowning themselves in escapism. Also, when you see something wrong with society, it is easy to want to identify with and be a part of something that is different that you feel can counteract it. So I empathize with those feelings.
I would normally be wholly against this sort of statement, if I didn't realize a little bit where you're coming from, though. Having browsed a lot of Tumblr lately, there's a lot of
"check your privilege" types that go way too far and sound really condescending.
Indeed many of those people saying "check your privilege", they're playing oppression Olympics like you said. And there's a bizarre and annoying sense of othering. Not to mention loads of condescension. A lot of these people, of course, being straight, white, heterosexual, and male.
Or maybe you don't agree at all, since what you're going off against are possibly not the same as the types I'm criticizing.