Linus tech tips is disappointed that the steam machine won't be priced like a console.

No, it's not the Steam Machine; it doesn't do upgrades.
I won't try to convince you, I just think Valve designed a flop product, that's my opinion.

Going by some of your Saturn tech spec takes in that thread, I'm gonna cast some doubt on you thinking this is a flop.

Positioning it as a "console-like experience" while also charging more than the consoles you're comparing to while also delivering less performance than those same consoles isn't a solid value proposition in my books. Having the flexibility of an unlocked Linux OS is certainly a terrific feature, but it also costs little to provide - it costs Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft quite a lot to maintain their locked down ecosystems. On the other hand, the Steam Deck is delivering enormous performance for its price point, which everyone - including Microsoft's partner devices from ASUS - has basically failed to match, leaving the Steam Deck as the best-in-class value still. The Steam Deck is an incredible product.
For the GabeCube, why would I buy it for $900 when can't keep up with my XSX when I could wait a year and buy Microsoft's NextBox for $1,000 and have it keep up with high end gaming machines while offering an optional full Windows experience, too? I said it in another thread, but I'll repeat it here: if they price it the same as a PS5, I think this is DOA. If they price it under the current consoles, I think they'll have a terrific product that could find a decent market.

I think some of you are acting as if Xbox still has a brand name value in the market like they had during the peak of 360 or even in the early XBO days. However, much of that goodwill with their brand name is dead. If Steam Machine and Xbox Magnus were within $100 of each other, and both companies put out similar volume of production and marketing, Steam Machine would outsell Xbox Magnus by at least 4:1.

Valve and Steam do not have the years of very real baggage that Microsoft and Xbox have accumulated in the actual gaming & customer space (of course, among the shill and astroturfing networks they'd have you think it's a completely opposite reality), and that matters a lot. Microsoft are arguably in a similar position that SEGA were in when transitioning to the Dreamcast, insofar as the brand name being in the toilet, and that actively worked against Dreamcast so there's no reason that won't work against Xbox Magnus.

It's just going to really come down to what Valve actually decide on pricing but also what type of volume scale in production they're looking to aim for, what levels of distribution to hit and what marketing to push & how. I would argue Valve being more reserved in those three areas is actually the biggest blessing for Microsoft's prospects with Magnus right now, depending on when Magnus launches and when/if Valve scale up efforts of production/distribution/marketing (or even potentially release a more powerful upgraded spec, maybe through OEM partners). The power differential isn't having nearly the impact some of you think and won't have much an impact to the majority of the likely target customer base for Steam Machine, either.

That's good point. Valve not reacting could just mean they are good poker players as they knew whatever they said, Linus would be screaming it to the world.

You know what would be hilarious? Valve had this thing starting at $400 and their silence in response to Linus was "oh shit.....we are pricing this too low"

Gabe's yacht club could do with some diamond-studded boats.

I dunno, I see people complaining about the lack of upgrades, but on the other hand, like the Deck, there's strength in numbers - you can, for the Deck, far more than any other custom PC, find game settings tweaked and videos of performance, because for the most part, there's just one spec, and all Decks perform close to the same.

Good luck finding the same number of game videos on some specific upgraded Dell laptop that's no longer OEM. Sure you can just google whatever GPU you have, but it may not be the exact same RAM, or CPU, or whatever else. And maybe you can often find the pair if you are using high end hardware on new games, but it's unlikely you'll find your exact model of desktop or laptop with some random game from 10 years ago, more than likely you will have to go off something similar.

So anyone who gets this is able to have that same experience, a relatively reliable and easy time of optimizing settings and other's doing it for you.

For the price? I feel like

$299-499: No thought, instant pre-order
$599: Will likely pre-order
$699: Going to think about it
$799+: For 512GB model? Probably not, approaching Go 2 prices here, and I think the Go 2 is probably a better deal than this Steam Machine, at least for me. I think more RAM, possibly a faster CPU? Not even sure, but there's too much competing tech if the base model is going to be $800+ imo.

Great points on the bolded. People are really underselling the benefit of a PC gaming device with a single fixed spec. Plus over time if Valve decide to scale up with higher-performance models, games already optimized for the initial spec automatically get major free performance boosts/uplifts, with no tweaking required by devs.

I think a lot of people are missing the point Linus is trying to make (albeit aticulated badly).

It's not like Machine is a console, Machine is a mini PC in the landscape where $400-$700 (considering what PS5/Xbox you pick) end-user 4K gaming experience exists. With robust library, bundled gamepad, ecosystem, sales, physical media (!) and so on.

Problem with Machine is that it its a very weird middle option kneecapped in all the wrong places, like VRAM or overclocking potential. People with lesser configs will not drop $600-$700 (I'm being optimistic here) for a very middle-of-the road mini PC becase they own those already. For money-concious gamers it's easier to buy a console for AAA and keep the (mostly) second-hand PC as a platform for everything else or jerry-rig something very close to Machine for far less. People looking for a new PC, in my mind, don't consider size as a factor at all, this PC will be monitor-bound in a man-cave 90% of the time and for the same money even with DRAM shortage I'm sure it would be easier to just go with more powerful Midtower built.

So at this point Machine is a strange answer looking for a question, a screenless and a bit more powerful Deck. A toy for already settled PC gamers with deep pockets that are looking for some tinkering and giggles with removablr panels. And some (like Linus) really wanted for Machine to be more affordable and mass-market to finally punch Windows gaming in the gut a little. With current market standing (I think they've confirmed some number to Linus off-the-record) Valve is punching air in the empty room, so to speak.

A lot of you are talking like seasoned PC gaming enthusiasts with 10 years of custom built rigs under your belt, but aren't separating yourselves from the macro market. With all due respect, that type of PC enthusiast is a minority within the PC gaming realm. It's like a PS5 Pro user complaining about games on base PS5 expecting them to be designed from the ground-up for the Pro, as if the Pro is the one with a 70+ million share of the PS5 install base.

Valve have already said that they took consideration of spec configs from their own Steam userbase into account, and that the Steam Machine is more capable than what ~ 70% of Steam users currently use. That's the type of audience they are aiming this device at, not people who built $2K rigs every two years with the latest & greatest GPUs.

People can keep using the "it's not a console!" defense for when this thing costs way too much, but those same people should consider the idea that if Microsoft's next hybrid machine costs the same or less with the same 'it's also a PC and runs Steam!' messaging, this Steam Machine is going to run into a tiny bit of trouble.

It's clear that there is a steam audience for a living room box experience(and I am one of those people), but that decision is not set in stone until we see some pricing on both ends.

If this thing costs only 100 less than Microsoft's upcoming superpowered hybrid, then it's a no brainer that I'm spending that extra 100 and buying the Xbox for next-gen power.

Yeah I'm really starting to see a pattern here with what fanbase is trying to push the most doomer/FUD on Steam Machine and it's not PlayStation and definitely not Nintendo people 🤔
 
First we need the actual price and then factor in the cheaper games and no paid online. Until then it's pointless to argue about the value of the Steam machine vs consoles.
 
If it's not console price the product doesn't make sense for me. For most of us as pc gamers it would be a significant downgrade as a replacement.

Love my steam deck and it gets used, it's gots a spot in my life that wasn't there before. The steam deck seemed pretty heavily subsidized so why not the machine? Linus said something like if they heavily subsidize a computer that could lead to huge corporate orders gobbling up all the stock and not gamers. Pretty interesting thought.

Now as an EXTRA computer hooked to the tv with all my emulators for a cheap price you got my attention heavy. Especially if I can figure out how to play steam on my main pc while my kids use the machine downstairs simultaneously.

I used to have an HTPC rubbing XBMC and then KODI. It was janky and eventually a smart tv with the plex app built in solved all that. So I did live that life before but this is so elegant I would absolutely go back in for more functionality.
 
Doubtful. Don't think you can buy a motherboard with dedicated GPU built in. Smallest ITX case I'm aware of is the Lian Li A4 h20

h20: 140x326x244

Steam Deck: 152x162x156

Exactly, it was a rethorical question 🙂 there's no way.
 
I'm pretty sure Daniel Owens built a similarly-spec'd PC and it came to something like $700.




Don't be surprised if this is somewhere between $649/$699 for the basic bitch version, and $749-$799 for the 2TB one.
 
Last edited:
They should sell it at a loss for $500

Valve would recoulp that loss and much more with 30% from Steam games.
And that is the difference between a traditional console and a steam machine.

One is a wallet garden, the other is not.
 
I'm pretty sure Daniel Owens built a similarly-spec'd PC and it came to something like $700.




Don't be surprised if this is somewhere between $649/$699 for the basic bitch version, and $749-$799 for the 2TB one.

I'd go on a limb and say $700 basic and $850 for 2TB. With how sketchy Valve is regarding pricing. Which takes into consideration to the whole DRAM situation.
 
Who's buying disc pc games today?
I didn't have a disc driver on my last few PCs for... I don't know, maybe ten or twelve years.
I can't remember even a single episode where I felt I was missing out on something.

Hell, I'm not sure if I've ever paused for a second to notice its absence outside of these type of forum discussions.
 
Pointing Up Morgan Freeman GIF by MOODMAN
 
I didn't have a disc driver on my last few PCs for... I don't know, maybe ten or twelve years.
I can't remember even a single episode where I felt I was missing out on something.

Hell, I'm not sure if I've ever paused for a second to notice its absence outside of these type of forum discussions.

I agree...but somehow this thread makes me want to get one these external disc drives for 20 bucks. I still have old pc games on disc. It doesnt really hurt to have one.
 
If it hits the $600 or more mark the value of this thing rapidly diminishes.

It won't be able to play alot of popular games due to anti cheat.

With the low vram and you end up with a box that's really only decent when it comes to playing older and less demanding games as everything else won't be a pleasent experience.

The release timing just seems bad especially with ram prices skyrocketing.

Maybe it could have worked better if it came out around the time the current gen console released.
 
Last edited:
Negligible returns while losing out on playing some of the most popular games in the industry.



Is-Windows-Still-The-Problem-Steam-OS-Performance-Test-on-Xbox-Ally-X-6-46-screenshot.png


Is-Windows-Still-The-Problem-Steam-OS-Performance-Test-on-Xbox-Ally-X-7-17-screenshot.png

Is-Windows-Still-The-Problem-Steam-OS-Performance-Test-on-Xbox-Ally-X-7-27-screenshot.png

Is-Windows-Still-The-Problem-Steam-OS-Performance-Test-on-Xbox-Ally-X-8-17-screenshot.png


Not only about performance,

steam os has better sleep and resume

and you don't ever get window pop ups or notifications while starting up a game, while exiting a game or during a game. Those are the 3 main things to me

You also get access to quick settings to easily adjust the settings of your system on Steam os, much easier to do than on windows

The only games you miss out on are ones that use anti cheat but hopefully that solved soon for the people that play those
 
Last edited:
Why? He can buy/build the beastest PC, mini or otherwise (if not have it for free from companies). He has no use for a Steam machine even if it's a free pack in a cereal box. Or does he fear for PC gaming based on how one out of thousands of products does (lol, nobody's stopping that train)? 🤷‍♂️

Edit: I changed mind the worst thing about it is nerds who don't even do it pretending they have tried it posting fake stupid horror stories about how bad it is compared to their favorite overpriced branded box & games that PC gaming has been obliterating for decades but they can't accept it🤦‍♂️
 
Last edited:
The biggest benefit a console has is that the devs optimize their games to the core. What will even the benefit be with Steam Machine, especially if it barely sells anything? I can't see studios putting any extra time on those "versions".
 
I don't know any anti cheat games I want to play either, I don't really play much multiplayer anymore
Yep, me too. Last one I played was Battlefield1 which bored me to death after 20hrs.

But than again....there is lots of mp games with anticheat playable on linux as well. This has nothing to do with linux or windows...its solely a decision from game devs/publishers how their anticheats reacting to a linux environment.
 
Why would valve - trying to push more people towards steam store - put a disc drive on this thing?

Who's buying disc pc games today?

This should be priced sub $700 though.

That's definitely a legitimate point, but I also feel that the lack of disc drive could potentially give Sony a slight advantage for new consumers who want to jump into a new platform who prefer discs over all digital as well especially gamers who grew up on console gaming.

They'll look at, well the PS6 plays both digital and physical(I'm assuming) while the Steambox only plays digital for a possibly higher price. Then again, Steam game prices in general are typically more lower than console digital prices, so this might not matter quite as much in the end.
 
Anything over $550 and it's DOA. The people who is this aimed at are people who want an easy console-like experience (couch, TV, controller). Chances are they don't have a PS5 if they're looking at this. A PS5 gamer who wants to get into PC gaming isn't going to want a PC that is weaker than their PS5, the whole point of getting into PC for them is higher performance/eye candy. So if the person this is aimed at doesn't have a PS5, there's not many reasons he would choose the Steam Machine if it's priced higher than the PS5, especially if it's much higher.

Sure there'll be free online and a bit bigger library on the Steam Machine, but PS5 gets almost everything these days, even XBOX games. And the great thing with PS5 is you can have physical media, which allows friends to lend you games, which is nice when you have a new console with not many games of your own yet, not to mention the option to resell your games when you're done with them.
 
Anything over $550 and it's DOA. The people who is this aimed at are people who want an easy console-like experience (couch, TV, controller). Chances are they don't have a PS5 if they're looking at this. A PS5 gamer who wants to get into PC gaming isn't going to want a PC that is weaker than their PS5, the whole point of getting into PC for them is higher performance/eye candy. So if the person this is aimed at doesn't have a PS5, there's not many reasons he would choose the Steam Machine if it's priced higher than the PS5, especially if it's much higher.

Sure there'll be free online and a bit bigger library on the Steam Machine, but PS5 gets almost everything these days, even XBOX games. And the great thing with PS5 is you can have physical media, which allows friends to lend you games, which is nice when you have a new console with not many games of your own yet, not to mention the option to resell your games when you're done with them.
Maybe 550 for the console by itself and 600 with controller then add 100 to that for 2 tb version
 
Last edited:
You can build a pc that small yourself?
Is that necessary ? I can build a slightly larger one, with an Nvidia graphics card and expansion capabilities. The Steam Machine is an unattractive product. I still can't understand why Valve did it, It's neither a real console nor a real PC.
 
I don't know, for a PC/console hybrid that aims for the convenience factor of a console, the idea that the Steam Machine should cost more than €500 seems rather odd to me. Those who primarily game on PC probably won't buy it in droves because of the limited upgrade options. And those who want to comfortably game on their TV from the couch will compare the Steam Machine to current-gen consoles. Furthermore, the Steam Machine doesn't incorporate any future-proof technology.

Five years ago, this thing would have made more sense; now it's competing with consoles that are (presumably) cheaper and will be replaced by their significantly more powerful successors in one or two years.

I understand that RAM prices, etc., have all increased, but I wouldn't want to pay more than €399 for the 512GB version.

In that respect, I can certainly understand Linus's point.
 
I'm pretty sure Daniel Owens built a similarly-spec'd PC and it came to something like $700.




Don't be surprised if this is somewhere between $649/$699 for the basic bitch version, and $749-$799 for the 2TB one.

Microcenter did one for $650. https://www.microcenter.com/product/698873/powerspec-g526-gaming-pc

They are offering bundled discounts, but Valve isn't paying wholesale prices for the individual parts. They are getting them even cheaper.

Normally AMD makes a GPU die, those are sold to the board partners who then create a graphics cards out of it and doing their own mark up, this is sold to a retailer who marks it up and then sells to a consumer. Valve is buying directly from AMD and getting these manufactured themselves.

The earlier leaked video speculating $399 is worth a watch. Digital Foundry did an updated video that the CPU is in fact Hawk Point 2 with 2x Zen 4, 4x Zen 4C like Morse's Law Is Dead predicted. That means his BOM of $425 is properly very close to reality. But one difference is that BOM was for regular parts. These are AMD's rejects. The CPU is six core rather than the full eight, the GPU is 28 CU rather than the full 32. When AMD is getting the dies made they are all stamped out of a big silicon wafer. It's not a 1,000% perfect process and there are defects. TSMC has been pretty good, but you can expected 10-15% of the yield having a defect. This means a single core might not function, or the the CPU isn't stable as targeted speeds with targeted voltage. AMD retains all those rejected dies once they get enough, they create lower tier products they sell for a discount, so that quoted $180 could be $140-150 or whatever.

We'll have to see what continues to happen with RAM and storage prices in the next few months. But don't count Valve out yet. Them being really quiet and telling Linus it won't be price like a console could be them pricing it less than a console. For all we know they were discussing $399 vs $449 pricing trying to get it as cheap as possible. Then they have Linus asking about a $499 price and they don't want to blow the surprise.
 
Pudel do you see my dirty PC. I never open it up. That case fan on the back doesnt even work. Stopped working a long time ago. There is a 5800X3D in it and a 4090. It has never overheated nor does the performance ever throttle. Its the CPU and GPU fans that are essential. Those case fans aren't doing much of anything but putting on a show.

20251119-124039.jpg

Your rear fan might be less critical because your case has so much ventilation. Air blown by the other fans can freely travel through it.

The rear fan on my case died in the exact same spot, but mine doesn't have so many vents. I solved it by just removing the side panel. Now that's passive venting, better than when the fan worked. When I had an older build in the same case, I just left a box fan where the panel should be and flicked it on when a game was running to get 10c lower temps lol
 
The Kardashians are the most popular celebrities on the planet - your point being?
Maybe, I don't know, don't follow celebrities
Crouching into the corner and denying reality is not the best behavior strategy

Nah, I have a real pc already....thanks! I just dont give a fck about GaaS games in general....this has nothing to do with any device itself.
You don't, many do
And your faction of gaas haters opinion becoming less and less relevant as time goes by
 
And your faction of gaas haters opinion becoming less and less relevant as time goes by
Yeah, unfortunately. People nowadays are being educated and brainwashed into systems that rely only on paid online services. I will never understand anyone who applauds this.
 
Is that necessary ? I can build a slightly larger one, with an Nvidia graphics card and expansion capabilities. The Steam Machine is an unattractive product. I still can't understand why Valve did it, It's neither a real console nor a real PC.
That's not the question. Someone said you can just build a PC that small yourself, which I disputed 🙂

I have no idea if it's necessary, you tell me. But the point is, Valve is offering something that you can't just build yourself. For what it's worth.
 
Yeah, unfortunately. People nowadays are being educated and brainwashed into systems that rely only on paid online services. I will never understand anyone who applauds this.
Brainwashed... lol. It's really a loser argument

I play gaas for 30 years (from when nobody called them gaas) and I do applaud rise of social interactivity in gaming. It expand audience and attract normal people, and as for asocial nerds... They will continue to cry about "casuals" invading their turf (even though gaas often much more hardcore than their puny SP games) but that's life.
 
Given its specs it would be only normal that it was a bit cheaper than a PS5 Digital version.

Anything above the disc version makes it a no go... Especially given that it doesn't even play the top titles of the day (those with kernel based DRM).
 
Since it will most likely come with a controller, it will be at least $499. I'm just saying since they are pushing this as a console replacement, the controller will be standard.

I believe Valve said they will offer it both with and without the controller. I imagine some people would prefer a different controller. As a long time console player, I'm looking at that Steam controller and wondering myself. It reminds me of the Duke, which felt awkward.

If I get this, I would end up buying the Steam controller just to try it out, but I could end up back with a Dual Sense, because it's more familiar and comfortable.
 
I play gaas for 30 years (from when nobody called them gaas) and I do applaud rise of social interactivity in gaming. It expand audience and attract normal people, and as for asocial nerds... They will continue to cry about "casuals" invading their turf (even though gaas often much more hardcore than their puny SP games) but that's life.
If you enjoy that, fine....I dont (anymore)! 🤷‍♂️
 
Is that necessary ? I can build a slightly larger one, with an Nvidia graphics card and expansion capabilities. The Steam Machine is an unattractive product. I still can't understand why Valve did it, It's neither a real console nor a real PC.

First, not everyone wants to build a PC. Second, building an ITX PC is more expensive/difficult than ATX or mATX. I know as my current build is mATX after considering building ITX.

So you went from promoting laptops to small PCs with dedicated, upgradeable GPUs as the alternative. lol...ok, that comes at a cost. That PC is close to $800 to get something similar to what Valve is selling with Steam Machine. If you can even find a pre-built like that then it will cost even more.
 
Given its specs it would be only normal that it was a bit cheaper than a PS5 Digital version.

Anything above the disc version makes it a no go... Especially given that it doesn't even play the top titles of the day (those with kernel based DRM).
Mini PCs cost more than consoles so can't expect it to be the exact same price as ps5 it will be a little more, plus it's not being as mass produced as much as the ps5 is

Both of those things together will make it cost more, but at the same time it needs to cheaper than equivalent mini pc
 
Last edited:
Your rear fan might be less critical because your case has so much ventilation. Air blown by the other fans can freely travel through it.

The rear fan on my case died in the exact same spot, but mine doesn't have so many vents. I solved it by just removing the side panel. Now that's passive venting, better than when the fan worked. When I had an older build in the same case, I just left a box fan where the panel should be and flicked it on when a game was running to get 10c lower temps lol


Screenshot-20251120-070625-Chrome.jpg


This video and picture from it is an example of what im talking about. Top fans on the computer that are basically doing nothing. Its just window dressing. Aesthetics. That was my original point. Even with all these videos on the subject have you noticed none of them do any gaming performance benchmarks of how much having all of these additional fans running attached to the case actually help.
 

Screenshot-20251120-070625-Chrome.jpg


This video and picture from it is an example of what im talking about. Top fans on the computer that are basically doing nothing. Its just window dressing. Aesthetics. That was my original point. Even with all these videos on the subject have you noticed none of them do any gaming performance benchmarks of how much having all of these additional fans running attached to the case actually help.

Top fans are mainly for water cooled systems. They cool the radiator.
 

Screenshot-20251120-070625-Chrome.jpg


This video and picture from it is an example of what im talking about. Top fans on the computer that are basically doing nothing. Its just window dressing. Aesthetics. That was my original point. Even with all these videos on the subject have you noticed none of them do any gaming performance benchmarks of how much having all of these additional fans running attached to the case actually help.


I get your point here, but the PC that you originally commented on had an AIO. Are you saying the fans on the radiator are not needed as well?

edit: DeepEnigma DeepEnigma beat me to it
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom