Just watched the Jinx in one sitting after this doc. I'm hooked on true crime docs now. Anymore I should check out?
Yeah, but there were a bunch of people that lived in that area. Was there more evidence for Steven for any of them?If you were on a jury and the last person who saw the victim had her burned body 20 ft outside his window and her car on his property, could you really acquit? Would be tough.
Last I googled, I saw nothing of the sort and it seems a bit of a sham.Is it true that Anonymous claims to have evidence for his innocence?
Is it true that Anonymous claims to have evidence for his innocence?
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/making-a-murderer-anonymous-claims-to-have-evidence-that-netflix-documentary-s-subject-steven-avery-a6790546.htmlLast I googled, I saw nothing of the sort and it seems a bit of a sham.
Yeah i don't know. Just something a friend told me and he sent a linkThe Twitter account is a mess. Twitter is like the worst way to convey these things. They post some confusing message and then like 4 images without real explanation.
If they have something they need to actually write out an explanation or make a video. I don't think they have much, though.
There was an article where Dean Strang was interviewed about his thoughts on the doc, and he mentioned that both he and Buting were still in contact with Avery and doing some pro-bono work on the side.
So they're definitely still involved sans paycheck.
Can someone list all the evidence, left out by the filmmakers, that would have made Steven's innocence questionable?
The only I saw mentioned in an article was Teresa's negative response to him, which was allegedly relayed to her boss(?) a piece of evidence that can be argued as hearsay.
Furthermore, I'm curious about what people the people who believe he did think about Brendan's involvent.
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about.This show needed a better editor, it really hampered the quality in my opinion. Just a lot of filler and stretching, 10 one hour episodes was way too much. I honestly felt like they could have cut 1/3-1/2 of material in some episodes and it would have been better paced.
Jesus, I just watched eight episodes in a row. No breaks... eight hours in one sitting.
I can hardly believe what I just saw.. Literally the most baffling thing. Some of the most manipulative, corrupt, twisted people i've seen. I have no idea how some people can be like that.. Literally the devil.
I have to say both of Steven's Lawyers were legends though. I really liked those guys.
It was such a one sided case (in Stevens favor). It boggles my mind he got convicted again. Brendan too, although he had more against him with saying one thing then another all the time. But he was clearly manipulated into it all.
Also the whole time the show went on I had a really odd feeling towards Teresa's Brother. Something really didn't seem right about him..
I'm glad I'm not the only one!
I'm down to the last episode.I, too, get a strange vibe from her brother, he feels weird and creepy to me.
Edit: Oh yeah that holy spirit lady lol it pains me that this shit is taken seriously in courts around the world.
Might as well say my Shaman guided me.
I have way more belief and respect for Shamans than that fucking holy spirit infused lady/goon.
What isn't right about Teresa's brother is that his sister just died and he's the spokesperson for the family in a highly publicized murder case.
He's not going to believe Steven or Brendan. He has literally zero reason to. To him, the system worked.
On top of that he would have been getting direction from the prosecution. Generally they want to create a unified front for the media. Having the brother just sound off on whatever would have been counter-productive. He only seems creepy to us because we are seeing this whole thing through the perspective of the defense.
That's probably the kind of reasoning thatBrother in Law being a shit probably means he did it. Dude is an asshat.
That's probably the kind of reasoning that...led the jurors to condemn Avery
As soon as Teresa's ex-boyfriend gets on the stand and states.he cracked her password for her phone account and then refuses to say when exactly he saw her last....
I mean come on. I'm not saying he did it-but he is actually far more of a suspect than Steven
You can't be serious. Far more of a suspect? There couldn't possibly be a bigger suspect than the man that was assumed to see her last, has her car with his blood/sweat inside of it parked on his property, with her burnt bones and burnt cell phone 20ft from his door.
I'm not saying Avery did it, but he was the ultimate suspect. Whether or not that was all by design, we'll probably never know, but there is no bigger suspect.
And what motive would Avery have had to do this, again? And in the midst of this horrific act he commuted he calmly took a 20ish minute long call from his girlfriend?
I don't have the answers here, I'm just saying there is no bigger suspect than Avery. Unless there was a witness seeing somebody with her after she left Avery's property, there couldn't possibly be a bigger suspect than Avery.
Murder investigation 101
Where was the victim last seen alive?
Who was the last person to see her alive?
Where was the body found?
All point to Avery.
Avery basically lived in an isolated bubble, it's not outrageous to think he would be comfortable enough to talk on the phone while Teresa's dead body in the back of her vehicle parked in his garage. It's not like he had roommates that might come home and discover something weird.
it's the car/body stuff and where it was found and how that leads to people having reasonable doubt about him actually being the murderer.
i think cops originally suspected he was the murderer, but there wasn't anything seriously conclusive pointing to him, so there was stuff done to the scene to plant all of the evidence pointing to him. even if avery did kill her, the police fucked up by screwing with the scene of the crime.
I 100% would've voted not guilty based on what the documentary showed. All of the evidence shown in the doc was just way too convenient. Teresa's key that was found in plain sight on the 4th or 5th day of the search, which had none of Teresa's DNA on it, and just so happened to be found by someone who gave a deposition 2 weeks prior concerning Avery's lawsuit against his police department? Please.
I don't have the answers here, I'm just saying there is no bigger suspect than Avery. Unless there was a witness seeing somebody with her after she left Avery's property, there couldn't possibly be a bigger suspect than Avery.
Murder investigation 101
Where was the victim last seen alive?
Who was the last person to see her alive?
Where was the body found?
All point to Avery.
Avery basically lived in an isolated bubble, it's not outrageous to think he would be comfortable enough to talk on the phone while Teresa's dead body in the back of her vehicle parked in his garage. It's not like he had roommates that might come home and discover something weird.
In most cases, the people who are close to a victim are the ones who are in fact the killers. And, in this case, in every single instance, all those people who are close to her, the police never investigated any of them. They never from the minute the case was reported considered seriously considered the possibility that Teresa Halbach was killed by somebody she knew.
Right. And there are like 13 of these "coincidences". It's so fucking shady, man.
Straight from the show: