Don't tell CNN that, they don't want to hear it.
Are they suggesting that its on an airstrip somewhere or something?
Don't tell CNN that, they don't want to hear it.
Why would you assume that the water in an ocean would be "harder" than the water in the Hudson River.
Are they suggesting that its on an airstrip somewhere or something?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopian_Airlines_Flight_961
50 people survived this and more would have survived if they hadn't inflated life jackets when the water flooded in.
-- Last night several of the commentators pretty much just shat on the crazy theories and the host kept saying "well people want us to present all the options."Don't tell CNN that, they don't want to hear it.
They're not looking in the wrong area, the problem is that the search area is too fucking big.
If it actually did crash in the Indian Ocean, it will be years before it's ever found, if it's ever found at all -- which is very likely.
Are airline pilots regularly checked for substance abuse?
Blame Fox News for that nonsense.CNN breaking news every 5 minutes.
Blame Fox News for that nonsense.
I remember when Breaking News was reserved for news that was important to the nation.
Well, real breaking news still is. Breaking news makes no sense for a 24/7 network because they have no other programming to break into
..."well people want us to present all the options."
Breaking News - Car Fire on I-95Well, real breaking news still is. Breaking news makes no sense for a 24/7 network because they have no other programming to break into
LOL. It's funny watching these talking heads give their take on aviation. Hilarious.CNN in a nutshell.
"John is a professor at the University of Education, and he believes the plane turned into a nuclear submarine and is planning a terrorist attack. That is a fascinating theory John, can you expand on it for the next 30 minutes?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethiopian_Airlines_Flight_961
50 people survived this and more would have survived if they hadn't inflated life jackets when the water flooded in.
-- I found it quite depressing.LOL. It's funny watching these talking heads give their take on aviation. Hilarious.
If this was a plane that left the US, they would have found it hours after.
Im not trying to sound like a dick, but It is my belief.
Stutter and stammering their way though-- I found it quite depressing.
I refuse to believe there is a Taliban controlled airfield big enough to land a 777 (and not being detected by satillite.)
I call bullshit.
This 007 villain theory is BULLSHIT.
Sorry if this has been discussed already, but if the plane had crashed wouldn't the black box be broadcasting its location?
So nothing was ever heard from the passengers during all this ? If there were a hijacking you'd think they'd try to send the word out on their mobiles like the 9/11 passengers.
And on the 10th anniversary of LOSTOn friday 2 weeks already.
It's been reported to be part of the data transferred over ACARS.
so what did i miss from yesterday?
If this was a plane that left the US, they would have found it hours after.
Im not trying to sound like a dick, but It is my belief.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...g-plane-it-took-2000-years-to-find-noahs-ark/So, what, it took us 100 years to find the Titanic? Hemmer noted. It took us 2,000 years to find Noahs Ark. Do we ever find flight 370?
"Oh, I think we find flight 370 much sooner than those two things, thank God, Lagonia said. Until then, its the greatest reality show in the world.
CNN at least can take comfort that it's not Fox.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...g-plane-it-took-2000-years-to-find-noahs-ark/
Oh my word.CNN at least can take comfort that it's not Fox.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...g-plane-it-took-2000-years-to-find-noahs-ark/
I really think that plane crashed somewhere in the middle of the ocean.
If this was a plane that left the US, they would have found it hours after.
Im not trying to sound like a dick, but It is my belief.
-- You are operating under the mistaken impression that any of these circling vultures have even a shred of shame.Oh. my. I don't think I'd ever show my face in public again.
CNN at least can take comfort that it's not Fox.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...g-plane-it-took-2000-years-to-find-noahs-ark/
owwww man in a week where the colbert report and the daily show are a week off.CNN at least can take comfort that it's not Fox.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...g-plane-it-took-2000-years-to-find-noahs-ark/
CNN at least can take comfort that it's not Fox.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...g-plane-it-took-2000-years-to-find-noahs-ark/
Even for a fundie, wouldn't that be at least another couple thousand years off anyway? I wasn't aware the Ark was sailing during the time of Jesus.
CNN at least can take comfort that it's not Fox.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...g-plane-it-took-2000-years-to-find-noahs-ark/
http://abcnews.go.com/International/search-missing-malaysia-airlines-flight-370-drastically-narrows/story?id=22975958
The search area has been cut down "drastically" (still a very large area though). Probably because Australia shared some of their radar coverage and by process of elimination figured where the plane couldn't have gone.
SourceA simple computer upgrade that Malaysia Airlines decided not to purchase would have provided critical information to help find the airliner that disappeared 11 days ago.
The upgrade, which wholesales for about $10 per flight, would have provided investigators with the direction, speed and altitude of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 even after other communications from the plane went dark, said a satellite industry official familiar with the equipment.
Data from a similar computer upgrade allowed investigators in the crash of an Air France jetliner in 2009 to quickly narrow their search area to a radius of about 40 miles in the Atlantic Ocean, and in five days, they found floating evidence of the crash.
The ocean search for the missing Malaysian flight now covers a vast expanse of water, about 2.24 million square nautical miles of the Indian Ocean from the west coast of Malaysia to the waters off Perth, Australia.
$10 per flight is about 5¢ per passenger.
It took them 70+ years to find the Titanic, and everyone knew the general area where it sank.
It won't take that long thanks to today's technology, but still...it ain't easy to find something thats likely on the bottom of the ocean, especially if you have no clue where to look.
Companies don't go out of their way to pay for things that might only occur less than a hundredth or a percent or maybe even less. If you operated that way you'll have very high operating costs.
It's another thing for the aviation regulations to mandate such functions though, which is what they should do.
I know next to nothing about deepsea diving, but there have to be some trenches that are just completely inaccessible to us, aren't there? All I'm saying is that if the wreckage sank into some area like that, it'd never be found.
this.
Once it's in the sea it can't broadcast it's beacon far from what I've read in this thread.
Phones don't work in planes so far away from a phone mast and the plane didn't have consumer-access-wifi enabled/installed.
Time to call James Cameron then?
James Cameron doesn't do what James Cameron does for James Cameron. James Cameron does what James Cameron does because James Cameron is James Cameron.