Is this really how they respond to the criticism? No one should say to themselves deserved credit in this kind of situation.
This will only add fuel to those family. Real bad move there.
I just want to find something physical and measurable that confirms the data suggesting it crashed into the South Indian Ocean. Regardless of data accuracy, it will help all parties involved, and those mourning, if there's something physically substantial that the plane was there more than words and numbers. Fingers crossed that day comes.
So if this is it, what happened?
How would the plane end up on that course?
Mechanical failure? Are you serious?
If the pilot is a robot, possible.
Sure, why not?Indeed.
So mechanical fault allowed the plane to fly for seven hours with no deviation?
It is obvious the pilot was on a suicide mission. He probably killed the co pilot, switched everything off and flew into the ocean where the plane would be impossible to find.Indeed.
So mechanical fault allowed the plane to fly for seven hours with no deviation?
Seems kinda insane. Also gross. With so little data they've made a conclusion, citing mechanical failure, based on previous incidents?
The Air France 447 disappearance initially had ACARS transmissions to work with at least. Then partial wreckage a week later. Wrongful death suits didn't start pouring in until like 10 months later.
I heard a conspiracy theory today. Here goes:
Malaysian government already knew about the disappearance early on because the pilot hijacked the plane. Basically he was negotiating the release of Anwar Ibrahim. Negotiation fell through and plane goes into the ocean.
this actually seems plausible
As conspiracy theories go, it is.
If its true though, I don't believe they'd be able to cover that up indefinitely. And if exposed that they did have prior knowledge....we're talking serious ramifications. China would destroy them. China are politically angry enough at them and thats just on the basis the plane is gone.
China would launch missiles to Malaysia?
What a coincidence that in this case the pilots chose to direct the aircraft to the remotest region possible, turned off all equipment that would let them be found, before they ran out of oxygen...
The actions I mention are consistent with someone who wants to commit suicide but doesn't want the rest of the world to find out, due to the stigma associated with suicide in certain countries, and the stigma of taking 200+ other people with you.I did not say they ran out of oxygen, I am just showing that there is nothing absurd about the idea that a plane could continue flying on its own for hours after an emergency. As for the rest, you're inserting your unfounded belief that everything was a deliberate action. Yet your theory that every action was deliberate holds even less water than the 'coincidence' that the planes last action was to set a heading to the middle of nowhere -- none of those actions you mention are necessary or even helpful to crash the plane
-- It's not obvious at all. There's already WAY too much speculation.It is obvious the pilot was on a suicide mission.
Seems that Maldives news outlet has consulted with some experts, who seem to agree that object resembles a fire suppression bottle:
http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/54178
Weird!
It would be so bizarre if they were looking in the completely wrong place. I don't think they are, but this is a strange coincidence. Maybe it's just not what it looks like...?
Yes, that is odd. Especially since that is near the area that a "low flying jumbo jet" was reported by fisherman and residents...Seems that Maldives news outlet has consulted with some experts, who seem to agree that object resembles a fire suppression bottle:
http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/54178
Weird!
It would be so bizarre if they were looking in the completely wrong place. I don't think they are, but this is a strange coincidence. Maybe it's just not what it looks like...?
-- It's not obvious at all. There's already WAY too much speculation.
Yes, that is odd. Especially since that is near the area that a "low flying jumbo jet" was reported by fisherman and residents...
EDIT - from the article it sounds like they may be able to tie that to a type of plane (if it is turns out to be an aircraft fire suppression bottle). You would think that we would hear more on this soon.
it is very obvious IMO
he switched off the acars
he switched off the tcas
no communication from the plane after passing Malaysian fly zone
turned the plane around and crashed it in the ocean where it would be difficult to find.
it wouldn't surprise me one bit if he also shut off the cockpit voice recorder.
SOMEONE did, but there is absolutely no way to know with the info given if it was the pilot, the co-pilot, or a hijacker.
I don't know how these work but if these things are dropped from the plane after they are discharged, maybe it came from this plane: http://avherald.com/h?article=471fb36a&opt=0There will be serial number on the thing and shouldn't be too difficult to track down or rule out (from MH370 ).
I don't know how these work but if these things are dropped from the plane after they are discharged, maybe it came from this plane: http://avherald.com/h?article=471fb36a&opt=0
I assume someone can confirm this rather quickly if they look up the serial number though.
EDIT - NVM about the plane in the link above. It was no where near the Maldives.
what was wrong with the ocean he was above before the plane turned?It is obvious the pilot was on a suicide mission. He probably killed the co pilot, switched everything off and flew into the ocean where the plane would be impossible to find.
It must have been a horror ride for the passengers. Seeing nothing but water from the windows and then diving into the ocean
Fuck
how hard is it to storm the cockpit now? Anyone know? I am just saying it was the pilot cause he switched everything off including the acars. A highjacker wouldn't care about acars imo.
3. Is a hijack scenario even possible?
....Airliners have been fitted with strengthened flight deck doors - intended to prevent intruders from taking control - since 9/11. David Learmount, safety editor at Flight International magazine, says they are "bulletproof" and "couldn't be penetrated with an axe".
...."Even if the door was being broken down, they wouldn't be able to get in before there'd been a mayday call, unless the pilots were incapacitated," she says.
...
what was wrong with the ocean he was above before the plane turned?
i mean, if you're gonna take a dive one ocean seems as good as another. if he's going to kill himself, why bother with the 7 hours of flight.
The BBC touched on this in an article http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26671224 -
cause he wanted to hide the plane, make it difficult to find and make it difficult to recover the black box. the guy had it all planned out. The indian ocean where the plane crashed is much deeper and more hostile compared to the south china sea where it disappeared
That makes no sense; if he doesn't want the black box data recovered he could just disable it like the Silk Air pilot. Dumping it in the middle of the ocean would be less effective (see AF447). Why would he care if the debris is hard to find?
the silk air guy only disabled the cockpit voice recorder. you can't disable the black box.
With doppler effect, you can deduce the speed and direction from the signal. So if at all the available transmission points, the plane was flying south at a somewhat constant speed and direction, then it's very likely the plane took the south route ( and ended up at the south end of it, where they are searching now).Is there somewhere an explanation how Inmarsat could exclude the north corridor? I understand the stuff about the pings and doppler effect, but in theory the signals of the north and south route should be identical. So what helped to differentiate between the north and south corridor? Did they use the satellite drift or does the antenna of the satellite receive signals from the northern and southern hemisphere somehow differently?
With doppler effect, you can deduce the speed and direction from the signal. So if at all the available transmission points, the plane was flying south at a somewhat constant speed and direction, then it's very likely the plane took the south route ( and ended up at the south end of it, where they are searching now).
I have seen the documentary a couple of times and i am sure he only disabled the cvrYes you can and yes he did.
I have seen the documentary a couple of times and i am sure he only disabled the cvr
I cant believe you can disble the black box, that sounds foolish
Tsu's announcement ended at 15:46. At 16:05, 19 minutes later, the CVR stopped recording. Six minutes later, at 16:11, the FDR stopped recording, and at 16:12 the aircraft plunged into its fatal dive.
The cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder stopped recording minutes before the abrupt descent, but not at the same time.
You can deduce the speed (actually just one component) using the frequency change, but how can you deduce the direction?
Not the direction per se. From what I've read, they assumed a constant speed of 450knots or 500knots at a fixed direction ( that's why you have two tracks each way on the original plot).
The radial speed of the north tracks does not match the doppler shift.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SilkAir_Flight_185
The data recorder is on a breaker because pretty much everything is. It's a safety concern.
Thanks for clearing that up. So this is looking like a copy-cat case of Silk Air 185. I am betting this guy also disabled both
We will never learn what happened in the cockpit
Silk Air 185 and Egypt Air 990 freak me out big time. What kind of horrible human being do you have to be to kill 250-300 passengers?If both were shut down when the transponder was shut down then that is evidence in itself. In Silk Air it pretty much proved that the captain took the plane down on purpose.