SniperHunter
Banned
apparently there is one in the cockpit but it was never used.Maybe someone on board had a satellite phone.
apparently there is one in the cockpit but it was never used.Maybe someone on board had a satellite phone.
But there's another confusing twist. An emergency beacon that would have sent data if the plane was about to impact the ocean apparently did not go off, the official said, suggesting perhaps the plane was still likely in some stable flight pattern when it disappeared.
Don't know if this tidbit from CNN's article today was posted yet?
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/13/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-plane/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
They've always been experts in geography
Yeah the 777 has 2 transmitters. One for impact and one for when the plane takes on water. I have no idea of their range.Don't know if this tidbit from CNN's article today was posted yet?
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/13/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-plane/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
I am surprised people didn't turn on their phones or laptops and leave messages or emails for the loved ones. I am guessing 3g works at 35,000 ft right? or 4g? Some planes even have wifi these days
Maybe someone on board had a satellite phone.
Need to be conscious first though - got a -bad- feeling hypoxia was part of the problem here.
Need to be conscious first though - got a -bad- feeling hypoxia was part of the problem here.
No coverage at that altitude.I am surprised people didn't turn on their phones or laptops and leave messages or emails for the loved ones. I am guessing 3g works at 35,000 ft right? or 4g? Some planes even have wifi these days
The hell is that bottom one. Is that...Yugoslavia?
Great reporting guys.WSJ: The plane may have landed somewhere.
Need to be conscious first though - got a -bad- feeling hypoxia was part of the problem here.
Jesus, just the thought of an airliner cruising on autopilot, full of 239 people who are already dead... god, that makes the hair on my neck stand up.
If hypoxia occurred they were alive the whole time just unconscious. Even scarier thought.Jesus, just the thought of an airliner cruising on autopilot, full of 239 people who are already dead... god, that makes the hair on my neck stand up.
Correct -- they've turned they're attention to the Indian Ocean.Speculation: I wonder if something smashed into the cockpit and took out the pilots (either through impact or hypoxia). And then the locked cabin door prevented anyone from getting in there such that the plane flew for a long time before running out of fuel and crashing.
If so, it could have ended a LONG way away from the current search sites.
Speculation: I wonder if something smashed into the cockpit and took out the pilots (either through impact or hypoxia). And then the locked cabin door prevented anyone from getting in there such that the plane flew for a long time before running out of fuel and crashing.
If so, it could have ended a LONG way away from the current search sites.
All the tracking data in the plane already basically do that already. It's just that it can be turned off.I'm sure this has been brought up every time something like this happens.
I know pilots are rightly trained to handle the emergency situation in front of them, and communication with any air traffic control is the last thing on the list of things to do.
But wouldn't all the man hours of searching for potentially years all be saved if there was some sort of protocol for phoning in emergencies? A third man or automated trigger, a button which sends out last recorded position. It seems incredibly obvious so I'm sure there are reasons why it isn't or couldn't be possible, but educate me.
Speculation: I wonder if something smashed into the cockpit and took out the pilots (either through impact or hypoxia). And then the locked cabin door prevented anyone from getting in there such that the plane flew for a long time before running out of fuel and crashing.
If so, it could have ended a LONG way away from the current search sites.
Is the WSJ sourcing anything, or is it just more stupid circle-jerk speculation?WSJ: The plane may have landed somewhere.
Speculation: I wonder if something smashed into the cockpit and took out the pilots (either through impact or hypoxia). And then the locked cabin door prevented anyone from getting in there such that the plane flew for a long time before running out of fuel and crashing.
What if a catastrophe takes out that third man and/or button and/or the automated systems as well? Would we start including a fourth man?
All the tracking data in the plane already basically do that already. It's just that it can be turned off.
I know man.
Technically they are not "dead" though.
Autopsies from the victims of Helios Airways Flight 522 showed they were all alive during impact.
After the aircraft was returned into service, the flight crew overlooked the pressurisation system state on three separate occasions: during the pre-flight procedure, the after-start check, and the after take-off check. During these checks, no one in the flight crew noticed the incorrect setting.[8] The aircraft took off at 9:07[3] with the pressurisation system still set to "manual", and the aft outflow valve partially open.[9]
As the aircraft climbed, the pressure inside the cabin gradually decreased. As it passed through an altitude of 12,040 feet (3,670 m), the cabin altitude warning horn sounded.[3] The warning should have prompted the crew to stop climbing,[10] but it was misidentified by the crew as a take-off configuration warning, which signals that the aircraft is not ready for take-off, and can only sound on the ground.[10]
In the next few minutes, several warning lights on the overhead panel in the cockpit illuminated. One or both of the equipment cooling warning lights came on to indicate low airflow through the cooling fans (a result of the decreased air density), accompanied by the master caution light. The passenger oxygen light illuminated when, at an altitude of approximately 18,000 feet (5,500 m), the oxygen masks in the passenger cabin automatically deployed.[11][12]
Shortly after the cabin altitude warning sounded, the captain radioed the Helios operations centre and reported "the take-off configuration warning on" and "cooling equipment normal and alternate off line".[3] He then spoke to the ground engineer and repeatedly stated that the "cooling ventilation fan lights were off".[3] The engineer (the one who had conducted the pressurization leak check) asked "Can you confirm that the pressurization panel is set to AUTO?" The captain, however, disregarded the question and instead asked in reply, "Where are my equipment cooling circuit breakers?".[12] This was the last communication with the aircraft.
Calling it. North Korean's hijacked it.
Is the WSJ sourcing anything, or is it just more stupid circle-jerk speculation?
CNN is saying the WSJ reporter said US investigators are looking at the possibility that the plane may have landed.
CNN is saying the WSJ reporter said US investigators are looking at the possibility that the plane may have landed.
To add to this, the engineers already considered this as a possible failure mode.The cockpit isn't "sealed" from the cabin, ie: if something happened in the cockpit that caused hypoxia, it would also happen to the cabin(and vice versa, which is why the cockpit has extended oxygen supply).
The plane may have....landed? What is that theory even based on?
The lack of proof that it has crashed. I guess its still a valid possibility until we have proof the plane landed.CNN is saying the WSJ reporter said US investigators are looking at the possibility that the plane may have landed.
Transmissions from the engines suggest the plane flew for up to four hours after the transponder stopped functioning, and the plane dropped off radar. The plane has not been found, and therefore it's not inconceivable to theorize that it might have landed. It's unlikely, and it would definitely suggests maliciousness....but it's possible.
The lack of proof that it has crashed. I guess its still a valid possibility until we have proof the plane landed.
It's a hard speculation to believe.
I guess. It seems cruel to even mention such a remote theory to the media, though, given that so many family members are grieving. False hope is just wrong...
If there's a bunch of crash debris and oil floating around in middle of the ocean somewhere surely it will begin to be washed up on the shores sooner or later? I guess when that happens it would help to narrow the search.
I wonder if the plane could have crashed into the sea and sunk whilst causing very little to no floating debris?
If there's a bunch of crash debris and oil floating around in middle of the ocean somewhere surely it will begin to be washed up on the shores sooner or later? I guess when that happens it would help to narrow the search.
I wonder if the plane could have crashed into the sea and sunk whilst causing very little to no floating debris?
Found this comment on a website today. Kinda curious about his points:Yupp. The more likely scenario is probably that the same mechanical issue that disabled the transponder also caused a slow decompression. Plane was probably flying with everyone on board unconscious or dead. It's highly likely that the plane crashed into the ocean...but it probably crashed 4 hours away (in any given direction) from the point in which it dropped off radar.
Schiavo stated that the pilots at 35,000 feet had only 30 seconds before passing out. In a rapid decompression, the aircraft cabin doesn't go immediately to altitude, it takes a little time for the cabin to depressurize. The time of useful consciousness at 35,000 feet is 30 to 60 seconds; all transport category jets have "Quick Don" oxygen masks. It takes about 3 seconds to put them on, and at 35,000 feet you will stay alert as long as the Oxygen lasts, plenty of time to descend and fly the plane. The Airworthiness Directive is for cracking under the SATCOM antenna which is on the top of the fuselage ahead of the tail. There are no other com antennas in that area. The HF antenna is in the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer (tail) the L VHF antenna is above the cockpit and the center and right VHF antennas are on the bottom of the fuselage. Loss of the SATCOM antenna should not have prevented them from communicating. There are two antennas for the ATC transponder on the top and bottom of the forward fuselage; again, not in that area and the should have kept working. A fuselage crack doesn't normally lead to loss of the aircraft but, if it did, right there when they lost com, where is the debris. When an aircraft breaks up at altitude there is a huge amount of debris, much of which floats. Where is it?
The lack of proof that it has crashed. I guess its still a valid possibility until we have proof the plane landed.
It's a hard speculation to believe.
Strange.. Surely the range wouldn't matter doesn't it communicate via satellite?Yeah the 777 has 2 transmitters. One for impact and one for when the plane takes on water. I have no idea of their range.
UK Channel 5 have a live program on this tomorrow. http://www.channel5.com/articles/the-plane-that-vanished-live-trailer
I find it weird to do this so soon and jumping the gun a bit if it is found in the next few hours.
The plane may have....landed? What is that theory even based on?
The plane may have....landed? What is that theory even based on?