Lamel
Banned
Holy shit why does America need so many aircraft carriers
Small penises.
Holy shit why does America need so many aircraft carriers
Not if the question was 'is there a cover up?'
What kind of flight simulator? It's not unusual for people with a passion for aviation to set up home simulators using Flight Sim X. With the right equipment, you can actually use Flight Sim X to log real simulator hours.
There are so many states in India. I can imagine the plane flying flying over one or two states, not the entire country.Just stumbled upon this.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/15/us-malaysia-airlines-defence-idUSBREA2E0JT20140315
Like I said before, no country would be willing to admit an aircraft penetrated it's airspace undetected.
Senior IAF and Navy officers admitted there were "a few gaps" in India's civil and military radar networks but stressed it would be "virtually impossible" for a jetliner to fly undetected across the Indian mainland. "The five Airports Authority of India radars at Delhi, Kolkata, Ahmedabad, Chennai and Mumbai are integrated with IAF's air defence network. The possibility is far-fetched," said an officer.
Just stumbled upon this.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/15/us-malaysia-airlines-defence-idUSBREA2E0JT20140315
Like I said before, no country would be willing to admit an aircraft penetrated it's airspace undetected.
The problem I have with this theory is how do you plan for it? Do you simply cross your fingers and hope no one is watching the skies? This wasn't a by the seat of their pants operation...it was meticulously planned and executed by people who knew exactly what they were doing.This has been my theory all along. Everyone kept ruling out flying over land near India and China because it would have been "impossible" to do so without being detected and challenged. We'll see. My guess is that the airspace isn't as impenetrable as people think. You'd need people monitoring everything 24/7 and systems monitoring everything 24/7. I bet that doesn't happen everywhere.
My moneys on Shield Helicarrier.
This is a very hostile region. You got India and Pakistan who hate each other, China and India arent friends and there is US in Afghanistan. All nuclear armed countries with varying degrees of hostility, you think a 777 can just fly all over them?This has been my theory all along. Everyone kept ruling out flying over land near India and China because it would have been "impossible" to do so without being detected and challenged. We'll see. My guess is that the airspace isn't as impenetrable as people think. You'd need people monitoring everything 24/7 and systems monitoring everything 24/7. I bet that doesn't happen everywhere.
This has been my theory all along. Everyone kept ruling out flying over land near India and China because it would have been "impossible" to do so without being detected and challenged. We'll see. My guess is that the airspace isn't as impenetrable as people think. You'd need people monitoring everything 24/7 and systems monitoring everything 24/7. I bet that doesn't happen everywhere.
Why also forget the robust air defence networks of countries like Pakistan, fully-geared towards India, or the US-led forces in Afghanistan or Iran for that matter, all of which would have been on this so-called flight arc," he added.
Former IAF vice-chief Air Marshal P K Barbora, in turn, added, "Both India and Pakistan are very wary of any blip that comes up on their radars...it's very unlikely that a plane could have flown across the vast stretch of land without being detected by one or some other country. An aircraft flying low to avoid radars would not be able to go such a long distance."
True, which is probably why he flew over Myanmar, Bhutan, Tibet, and up through the Himalayas. I don't know why people aren't talking about that possibility.I have no doubt there are vulnerabilities and inefficiencies in the Indian and Chinese detection systems but if this was planned the pilot would have to know about it beforehand. He couldn't just go into India or China and hope he got lucky.
They couldn't have flown below radar?
I haven't read every post in this thread, but I don't think I've seen this theory posted yet:
MH370 shadowed another plane, specifically a KLM flight that would have been in the right place. Close enough, and it would have appeared as one plane to radar.
TCAS systems (to alert aircraft of other nearby aircraft) require the transponder to be turned on in both planes. So if MH370 had turned theirs off and were behind they would be invisible to the KLM flight.
They couldn't have flown below radar?
Is such a thing possible for such a large plane?
No but i'm saying this goes against the goals of most terrorists. Insight terror. I'm not saying your theory is incorrect I'm saying this looks like some sort of caper/mystery at this point.
They tried to land and flew along the coast. As far as I can tell they weren't trying to drop the plane in the middle of the ocean. They were trying to get OKed to land.
Leul on purpose flew near the coastline against the will of the hijackers.
Accept they initially wanted asylum no? Seems like the hijackers were just deranged. On top of that they had no concept of how much fuel was in the plane(i guess that could have happened in the current case too).I don't think the hijackers wanted the plane to land safely. Leul's (the pilot) Wiki page says this about the crash.
Leul on purpose flew near the coastline against the will of the hijackers.
Could wake issues be mitigated by flying above/below? Radar is two dimensional isn't it? (Distance not height).Except the wake turbulence would wreak havoc on the MH370 if it was flying anywhere near that close.
If both planes are programmed to fly the same aviation corridors/waypoints wouldn't the autopilot lead them on the exact same path? Then for MH370 it's just a matter of slowing down until the KLM plane passes by.It's a 777 not an F-16. They'd have to get lucky enough to spot the plane and jump into its flight path at just the right moment. It's not a pursuit aircraft, so if they missed their window that would be that.
Could wake issues be mitigated by flying above/below? Radar is two dimensional isn't it? (Distance not height).
If both planes are programmed to fly the same aviation corridors/waypoints wouldn't the autopilot lead them on the exact same path? Then for MH370 it's just a matter of slowing down until the KLM plane passes by.
There's apparently massive tension between Shias and Sunnis in Malaysia too, to the point that aspects of Shia are criminalized. This could very well turn out to be an internal religious conflict too. I imagine they're going to dig extensively into the pilot and copilot's backgrounds...
Its not like the US Navy is stockpiling them, they are slowly decreasing them.Holy shit why does America need so many aircraft carriers
Believe me, they have been digging into these guys from the moment the plane was discovered missing. By "they" I mean Malaysian authorities as well as US, Chinese, and likely other nations' intelligence.It seems a bit strange they haven't done this already. Anyways initially I was more suspicious of the younger one. The older one was being described as a model citizen but today I think I read a report that the older one was heavily into politics, something we hadn't heard earlier.
Its not like the US Navy is stockpiling them, they are slowly decreasing them.
Half are stationed Atlantic, etc
Half are Pacific based
Or something like that I think.
Accept they initially wanted asylum no? Seems like the hijackers were just deranged. On top of that they had no concept of how much fuel was in the plane(i guess that could have happened in the current case too).
I watched a video on this after reading the earlier post.
I don't think the hijackers wanted the plane to land safely. Leul's Wiki page (the pilot) says this about the crash.
Leul on purpose flew near the coastline against the will of the hijackers.
Also this is a very long shot but... is it feasible to land a 777 on an aircraft carrier? Just sayin...
My dad seems to think the plane was destined as an attack on Diego Garcia military base: (https://www.google.com/maps/place/D...2!3m1!1s0x249273fe6d69b0ad:0x3b3c07570eb0d1c5)
It's one of the most strategically important military bases in the world for the US thanks to it's location and isolation. It's also thought to be home to some CIA black ops and interrogation centers, used during the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It's primarily used as a home port for US Navy logistics ships. Judging by the google maps images available, they have at least ten B-52 bombers stationed there in addition to other aircraft (as well as two baseball fields and two tennis courts, fun).
It's close geographically, and it represents a location of some controversy thanks to reports that detained terrorist suspects were illegally held and tortured there in the last decade or so.
Thought it was an interesting theory. Looks like the range of the plane could have gotten it there with the fuel load if it had taken the south route they suspect it could have gone.
Obviously no information suggests that, but if you were a terrorist in that part of the world and wanted to make a statement, that sure would be one way to do it. Interesting to think about, in any case.
My dad seems to think the plane was destined as an attack on Diego Garcia military base: (https://www.google.com/maps/place/D...2!3m1!1s0x249273fe6d69b0ad:0x3b3c07570eb0d1c5)
It's one of the most strategically important military bases in the world for the US thanks to it's location and isolation. It's also thought to be home to some CIA black ops and interrogation centers, used during the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It's primarily used as a home port for US Navy logistics ships. Judging by the google maps images available, they have at least ten B-52 bombers stationed there in addition to other aircraft (as well as two baseball fields and two tennis courts, fun).
It's close geographically, and it represents a location of some controversy thanks to reports that detained terrorist suspects were illegally held and tortured there in the last decade or so.
Thought it was an interesting theory. Looks like the range of the plane could have gotten it there with the fuel load if it had taken the south route they suspect it could have gone.
Obviously no information suggests that, but if you were a terrorist in that part of the world and wanted to make a statement, that sure would be one way to do it. Interesting to think about, in any case.
Looks like the range of the plane could have gotten it there with the fuel load if it had taken the south route they suspect it could have gone.
seriosly, how hard can it be in todays timeAll the supposed modern technology , surveillance and spying by the NSA ,
interpol, the five eyes nations etc and they cant even find a plane.
Yep, I've been there before.
My dad seems to think the plane was destined as an attack on Diego Garcia military base: (https://www.google.com/maps/place/D...2!3m1!1s0x249273fe6d69b0ad:0x3b3c07570eb0d1c5)
It's one of the most strategically important military bases in the world for the US thanks to it's location and isolation. It's also thought to be home to some CIA black ops and interrogation centers, used during the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It's primarily used as a home port for US Navy logistics ships. Judging by the google maps images available, they have at least ten B-52 bombers stationed there in addition to other aircraft (as well as two baseball fields and two tennis courts, fun).
It's close geographically, and it represents a location of some controversy thanks to reports that detained terrorist suspects were illegally held and tortured there in the last decade or so.
Thought it was an interesting theory. Looks like the range of the plane could have gotten it there with the fuel load if it had taken the south route they suspect it could have gone.
Obviously no information suggests that, but if you were a terrorist in that part of the world and wanted to make a statement, that sure would be one way to do it. Interesting to think about, in any case.
My dad seems to think the plane was destined as an attack on Diego Garcia military base: (https://www.google.com/maps/place/D...2!3m1!1s0x249273fe6d69b0ad:0x3b3c07570eb0d1c5)
It's one of the most strategically important military bases in the world for the US thanks to it's location and isolation. It's also thought to be home to some CIA black ops and interrogation centers, used during the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It's primarily used as a home port for US Navy logistics ships. Judging by the google maps images available, they have at least ten B-52 bombers stationed there in addition to other aircraft (as well as two baseball fields and two tennis courts, fun).
It's close geographically, and it represents a location of some controversy thanks to reports that detained terrorist suspects were illegally held and tortured there in the last decade or so.
Thought it was an interesting theory. Looks like the range of the plane could have gotten it there with the fuel load if it had taken the south route they suspect it could have gone.
Obviously no information suggests that, but if you were a terrorist in that part of the world and wanted to make a statement, that sure would be one way to do it. Interesting to think about, in any case.
you cant fly there blind.
seriosly, how hard can it be in todays time
Like you were stationed there, or you took a nice vacation and visited the troops?
How large is this base? The plane would be low on fuel and while they might be able to damage a few buildings, just look at how (relatively) little damage was done to the pentagon.