Behold the ignorance. Facebook is an amazing place.Facebook said:There's a big problem with making it legal. Especially when it comes to religious liberties. When you change the legal definition of marriage and make it a constitutional right, people of faith who object to what they believe is wrong will be forced to do things against their will. A Christian photographer will have to participate in a gay wedding. A baker will have to participate in a gay wedding. But let’s take this a step further for a second. Let’s say, hypothetically, the Supreme Court makes the marriage of a 9 year old to an adult legal, then anyone who is against this on moral grounds would not be able to object. If you are owner of a hotel, you would not be able to deny this couple of a room on their wedding night. If your preacher, you would be forced to marry this couple. If this was your daughter, you will have no legal right to stop it.
“Respecting everyone’s civil rights is unmistakably important, and the right to marry is unmistakably a civil right. But the “right to marry” is the right to enter into a very particular kind of relationship having distinct characteristics that serve important social purposes; the “right to marry” is not the right to enter a relationship that is not a marriage, and then force others by law to treat that relationship as if it were a marriage. Advocates for same-sex “marriage” ignore this distinction. Far from serving the cause of civil rights, redefining marriage would threaten the civil right of religious freedom: it would compel everyone—even those opposed in conscience to same-sex sexual conduct—to treat same-sex relationships as if they represented the same moral good as marital relationships.”
I have no doubt that gay couples can be great parents. However, that’s not the issue at stake here. The marriage between a man and a woman is the only institution that can bring forth life and bind a man and woman together for life for the sake of the child. Granted, this may not be the case for every marriage, but in principle, that is the objective. That’s way governments throughout the ages have recognized it as such and have a vested interest in promoting it. This is not possible within “gay marriage” because it is against natural law. In these cases, a child is deny a father or a mother.
As far as extending marriage benefits. You don’t have to be married to receive some those benefits. Anyone can use the power of attorney.
You know, Lady Justice making out with Lady Liberty is how I've always mentally pictured equality, too.
Compared to Italy and Northern Ireland? Probably not, unless Northern Ireland gets a court ruling, though I'm not familiar with the specifics of Northern Irish law.
It's one of my all time favorite editorial cartoons.
I know that most people are expecting a victory here but that doesn't stop me from being extremely nervous with this being a week away
I don't see any world in which this isn't a victory, for the reasons stated in the OP.
Right logic tells me that but it's just hard to comprehend something so momentous only being days away
I don't see any world in which this isn't a victory, for the reasons stated in the OP.
There's a chance the decision is today? Hope it is. Pride celebrations will be even better this weekend.
Today's decisions have already been made. It's either tomorrow or Monday.
Matt Baume has a new video on how the opinion on gay marriage changed over the last couple decades: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWsTm4YJpRI
If Lafayette had more say in Louisiana politics we would be on the list by now. Stupid New Orleans.
Late to this thread, but wat
There's more to New Orleans than the conservative suburbs
Its amazing how fast all this happened. Can someone fill me in on how we went from banning gay marriage all over the country in 2004, to being a few days away from gay marriage legal everywhere? Was it the shitfest of the 2008 California marriage ban, something else? How'd popular opinion change so fast?
I remember the Kerry Bush election cycle, and it looking like this country was fucking doomed, to now, the culture warriors on the right getting their ass kicked.
Amazing.
Its amazing how fast all this happened. Can someone fill me in on how we went from banning gay marriage all over the country in 2004, to being a few days away from gay marriage legal everywhere? Was it the shitfest of the 2008 California marriage ban, something else? How'd popular opinion change so fast?
I remember the Kerry Bush election cycle, and it looking like this country was fucking doomed, to now, the culture warriors on the right getting their ass kicked.
Amazing.
Yeah, hasn't the city of New Orleans come out supporting gay marriage? It's the rest of the the state that is having none of it?
I hope everyone's prepared for the consequences of gay marriage being legalized. When we introduced it here in Britain it rained blood for 40 days, there were plagues of locusts, and people were rounded up at gunpoint and forced to marry militant homosexuals.
How was that different from any day in Britain
Because then it means their bible is wrong.
The first page of the new thread better be nothing but Penny gifs.
Well, Tomorrow will be exactly 1 year since SCOTUS struck down DOMA
So...
Expect the unexpected
And a second page asking who's that and "god I hate that gif" and "that fucking green dress". GLORIOUS TEARS
And a single post of that Community chainsaw gif.
The Fair Housing Act and Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare") rulings went so damn well today that I have a terrific feeling about the outcome of Obergefell. I'm thinking/hoping/predicting that they understand how symbolic and historic this case is and are waiting until the very last minute of this term, figuratively speaking, to go out on a decisive, momentous move for equality.
Never say never, and lord knows I've been stunned and/or disappointed by the Roberts Court before, but I really think this one is going to go well. It's going to be a beautiful day.
Yeah, hasn't the city of New Orleans come out supporting gay marriage? It's the rest of the the state that is having none of it?
What!? A Kelly can't marry a Kelly! It's too confusing!!
Tomorrow, June 26th, is not only the (2 year) anniversary of US v. Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry, it is also the 12th anniversary of Lawrence v. Texas, the historic Kennedy-penned decision which declared unconstitutional many state-level anti-sodomy laws and presaged so much of the forward progress on gay rights in the last decade. It's also just 2 days apart from the anniversary (June 28th) of the Stonewall Riots and, not coincidentally, Pride events in many places.
A historic date indeed.