Interesting theory. I’m not sure how much this is CCP alone though. There’s something about technology that has its own logic when anyone who wants power and control uses it. Why did Fauci fund gain of function research in Wuhan?
Biomedical research ultimately helps protect public health, Dr. Fauci argued in explaining his support for controversial research.
www.newsweek.com
Unfortunately I think we’re looking at a global group who want global dominance, so the model is corporate rather than national.
No doubt about that, though there are shared interests between the two.
I like to follow the money whenever I can and there's a ton to sift through with billionaires like Buffet (interesting side note, his sell off of bank stocks and reversal on gold), the Gates Foundation and China. Fauci's wife, Christine Grady, is head of Bioethics at the NIH and his youngest daughter, Alison, is a software engineer at Twitter. There's a large, tangled web riddled with conflicts of interest layered on top of each other that include the vaccine companies, CDC and FDA. It's an ugly mess screaming for more attention.
She's done some solid work putting together sourced info, worth taking a look at some of her threads. One about Fauci, the NIAID and the Wuhan lab
here which touched on gain-of-function research. Moderna's history/work culture according to a 2016
STAT News story is quite something, too.
On the day to day happenings, activists in the press here are pressuring the provincial government to take masks a step further, questioning why they aren't mandatory outdoors like in other areas of the world. It's the same song and dance used to make indoor mask wearing mandatory last month, repeating questions with total disregard for the answers until the government eventually buckles. I'm no fan of the English voice over, but 49:46 timestamp:
Patrick Bellerose, Journal de Quebec: "We saw many jurisdictions impose mandatory masks outside, globally or partially. I'd like to know whether that is something that is possibly being thought of for Quebec?"
Horacio Arruda: "Possibly, depending on the response that people may have we could perhaps do so."
"Depending on the response that people may have." I'm glad that's how we decide public health measures in states of "emergency." It's
all politics.
We only had 46 new cases reported in the last 24 hours and about 1,500 that are still active in a province of about 8.5 million, new cases in the double digits and falling for nearly a week, but yes, let's now make masks mandatory outdoors. If they go that route I'll become a peaceful protester and see if they still think "it's just a mask." Turnabout's fair play.