Mass Effect 3 SPOILER THREAD: LOTS OF SPECULATION FROM EVERYONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, I think they just assume "LOL spoiled fans are angry" without actually understanding why the fans are angry. It's not about happy ending because many have pointed out that both Mordin and Thane's death were considered some of the best moments in the game. It's the clusterfuck nature of the ending that everyone objected to.

I felt that the ending just came out of no where. Very confusing.

Seems like I was playing ME and than got put into a quasi deus ex game. My Shepherd is not a philosopher hes a killer.
 
Penny arcade fanfic is the best yet!

i-dfFJj7N-X2.jpg

I don't think they understand why people are angry about the ending.
 
Was this Forbes thing ever posted here? Hard to tell when the thread moves so fast.

Dumb fuckers like Kucheras should take a look at this.

While I understand the impetus behind broadening the appeal of a game, I also see no reason why it should come at the expense of the die-hard fans. If the number one complaint behind Mass Effect 3 is its ending, is there any reason to believe that a better set of endings that reflect the choices made in the first two games would somehow chase off new players? Is there something mutually exclusive about a good ending and a new audience? I’m perplexed.

I’m also having a hard time seeing where Joel is going with all of this. How does any of this lead to the “entitled gamer” label?

As far as I can tell, it basically comes down to this: being a smart consumer is more than just voting with your wallet. Half the time it’s too late for that. It’s easy to say “Well, if you don’t like the product, don’t buy it” but it doesn’t really work that way in practice.

Complicating matters further, many gamers upset by this game are long-time BioWare fans. They want the game to be good. They want the next BioWare title to be good. They wanted the last one to be good, too. Maybe at some point a lot of people will stop buying these games, but that’s hardly a win for anybody. Shouldn’t we be contemplating best-case scenarios?

Complaining isn’t a bad thing, either. Voters do it all the time in the realm of politics but an angry voter is considered “active” in politics, not “entitled” to good government.

Isn’t it better to complain? Isn’t it better to try to make a change than to simply give up? Isn’t it better for developers and consumers alike to communicate this sort of thing rather than to just give up on one another?

If you ran a restaurant and the food you served wasn’t any good, would you prefer to have your customers leave and never come back or would you prefer to hear their complaints and give you a second chance? Would you mockingly refer to them as “entitled” restaurant-goers? For that matter, are people who eat at your restaurant entitled to a good meal?

Anyways, I don’t mean to go on and on about this, but it really is a strange label to apply to customers. Of course the customer isn’t always right, but unless you have a captive market or a state-granted monopoly, you’re still pretty beholden to the people who buy your goods. If consumer exit exists, you’d better have a contingency plan.
 
That could be cool.A few Hundreds of year from now, human scientists manage to reinvent FTL travel thanks to the study of the broken Mass Relay and a ship is sent to recontact all the other species.You're the commander of that ship(maybe a descendant of Shepard) and get a new team of aliens/humans to explore the galaxy.

That'd be great, especially if your character's species was dependent on who your Shepard romanced. Like, the human descendant of the reporter lady, or Garrus' great grandchild, or Liara's actual blue Shep-baby.
 
lol @ box-art. you can even see shepards face as the planet on the right side.


Glad somebody noticed that. :)



Finished the game two days ago. Now I have a strange feeling of... not wanting to play again this game.

Yesterday i read from page 200 to 240 of this thread and some pages in the BSN forum. Do not remember something like this since some Halo game years ago.

Somehow this reminds me of an episode of The Simpsons where people destroy a casino and somebody runs with a giant ace of spades on fire.


I wonder how this will be seen by other studies.
 
That'd be great, especially if your character's species was dependent on who your Shepard romanced. Like, the human descendant of the reporter lady, or Garrus' great grandchild, or Liara's actual blue Shep-baby.

Oh I forgot about interspecies relationship :lol I'm not sure a descendant of Shepard is going to work then.

But yeah choosing your race from the descendants of the all species army would be neat.
I'm guessing they could do that, even it would cost a bit I guess.
 
Gamer entitlement is such a loaded term.

Game designers/writers forbid that we demand quality from their work. As a web designer, if a client is not happy with my work, I'd have no choice but to rework it, providing they understand that it'd take some time (and possibly extra budget). But you never ever tell the client to fuck off or that they are entitled loser, no matter how frustrated you are. That's not professional at all. If clients are not happy, they can easily not hire you next time they need something. I don't see why the same standard can't be expected out of game designer/writers. We pay a lot of money for their products.
 
Gamer entitlement is such a loaded term.

When they say A but do B.
Isn't that what people call a scam.
They knew dam well what people wanted hell even promised it wont be like B before release of the game. So everyone expects A but still got B.

But i paid for A not B.
I feel i should be entitled to get A and not B.

/Doesn't make a lot of sense indoctrination and you guys have to speculate on it.
 
Yeah, I think tycho even wrote a thing about how everyone should stop bitching because their not the ones who made the game.

Uh, I read Tycho's one as going against the notion that authors are invincible and all-knowing and should never revise their work, while Gabe as usual enjoyed it and doesn't see why others did not (which is fair enough)
 
Oh I forgot about interspecies relationship :lol I'm not sure a descendant of Shepard is going to work then.

But yeah choosing your race from the descendants of the all species army would be neat.
I'm guessing they could do that, even it would cost a bit I guess.

So we get Mass Effect 4: Origins and then in Mass Effect 5 we are forced to play a human name Falcun is the colony of Kirkshield.

Edit: I just realized my post looks like i'm trying to make fun of you. I'm not the similarities just kind of jumped out at me.
 
Oh I forgot about interspecies relationship :lol I'm not sure a descendant of Shepard is going to work then.

But yeah choosing your race from the descendants of the all species army would be neat.
I'm guessing they could do that, even it would cost a bit I guess.

If they limited it to Shep's potential lovers (with Liara and the female human LIs you can say they conceived on that last night on the Normandy; with the others you can say they moved on to other partners and/or adopted) you're only looking at quarian, turian, human, and asari, and all of them have pretty similar speaking patterns. You could get away with two actors, one for male and one for female, and just throw some processing on the turian one to give it that
sexy
Garrus effect.
 
Yeah, I think they just assume "LOL spoiled fans are angry" without actually understanding why the fans are angry. It's not about happy ending because many have pointed out that both Mordin and Thane's death were considered some of the best moments in the game. It's the clusterfuck nature of the ending that everyone objected to.

Agree they seem to be missing the point a little (maybe willfully so).
 
Bioware should make this ending, it seems this is the ending everyone wants. I'm indifferent with the ending of the game. I guess i do not understand the outrage, or maybe now it all has become some internet meme now.

NO

No one is angry because the ending isn't happy. People aren't outraged because Shepard died. It's what happens after Shepard collapses with Anderson dead that has everyone angry. I'm not sure how you could have read all the outrage and not understood.
 
Generally speaking G&T make the comic for whatever they find funny, not neccessarily as their opinions. Their rants are better for that.
 
The Mass Effect Relays blowing up transports a surviving Kai Leng into the future, dominated by the Varren, Vorcha and the Pyjaks, who are in the mist of a Galaxy wide war.

The possibilities are endless.

Sounds like the end of the Jet li movie "the One".
*Papa Roach music fades in*
 
Bioware should make this ending, it seems this is the ending everyone wants. I'm indifferent with the ending of the game. I guess i do not understand the outrage, or maybe now it all has become some internet meme now.

Of course, you wouldn't understand. Did you even try to read the posts, the various blog posts or even youtube video's, explaining peoples gripes? How about taking at least 5 minutes to understand the situation?
 
Fuck I just thought of something. If VI's are considered synthetic, my fish are going to die in the destroy ending. God dammit!
 
Game designers/writers forbid that we demand quality from their work. As a web designer, if a client is not happy with my work, I'd have no choice but to rework it, providing they understand that it'd take some time (and possibly extra budget). But you never ever tell the client to fuck off or that they are entitled loser, no matter how frustrated you are. That's not professional at all. If clients are not happy, they can easily not hire you next time they need something. I don't see why the same standard can't be expected out of game designer/writers. We pay a lot of money for their products.

Sorry, but that's bullshit. If you read a novel and the novel has a bad ending, do you demand that the writer change it? No. You say, I enjoyed it, but the ending was a bit of a letdown. Same with movies. Same with music, for god's sake. This is entitlement. They finished the game the way that they wanted, telling the story that they wanted to tell. Some people don't like it. That's not anybody's problem to fix; it's the people who don't like the ending's problem to get over.
 
Fuck I just thought of something. If VI's are considered synthetic, my fish are going to die in the destroy ending. God dammit!

Nah, Joker releases them into a pond on that planet which can support all kinds of life (e.g. human, turian, quarian, etc).
 
entitlement strawman


See what I mean?


But I'll humor your shitty argument. They promised us prerelease to have what was it, 16 different endings? They gave us 1 with pallet swaps.

Based on their promises and statements, are we really not entitled to what we were promised prerelease?
 
Sorry, but that's bullshit. If you read a novel and the novel has a bad ending, do you demand that the writer change it? No. You say, I enjoyed it, but the ending was a bit of a letdown. Same with movies. Same with music, for god's sake. This is entitlement. They finished the game the way that they wanted, telling the story that they wanted to tell. Some people don't like it. That's not anybody's problem to fix; it's the people who don't like the ending's problem to get over.

Other mediums do not evolve in the manner video games do. Nothing else in the entire world gets DLC and that needs to be taken into consideration when talking about games.
 
Sorry, but that's bullshit. If you read a novel and the novel has a bad ending, do you demand that the writer change it? No. You say, I enjoyed it, but the ending was a bit of a letdown. Same with movies. Same with music, for god's sake. This is entitlement. They finished the game the way that they wanted, telling the story that they wanted to tell. Some people don't like it. That's not anybody's problem to fix; it's the people who don't like the ending's problem to get over.

Thank you.
 
Sorry, but that's bullshit. If you read a novel and the novel has a bad ending, do you demand that the writer change it? No. You say, I enjoyed it, but the ending was a bit of a letdown. Same with movies. Same with music, for god's sake. This is entitlement. They finished the game the way that they wanted, telling the story that they wanted to tell. Some people don't like it. That's not anybody's problem to fix; it's the people who don't like the ending's problem to get over.

But gamers can certainly demand patches and balance changes to a game's systems. It seems narrative (or 'art') is sacrosanct, however.

It's funny you guys say that when the Mass Effect novel is getting fixed and rereleased.

Except in that case I guess.

Penny Arcade is really so awful. Another one of their strawman unfunny comics.

I honestly don't think it's leaning one way or the other. It's far more likely to be one of them going "What would the happiest ending to Mass Effect 3 be?"
 
Take it as the idea of a Reaper man culling a field of wheat to prevent the entire field from dying and it makes a certain kind of sense. Not very much though.

So the destruction of the mass relays is what everyone is upset about?

Dude

- Lack of closure
- Lack of truly consequential choices as a result of player actions throughout the entire trilogy
- Space wizard magic crucible beyond the bounds of suspension of disbelief
- Ham-fisted use of ghost child in a failed attempt to create false emotional attachment
- Barely any difference in the endings
- Unexplained developments (Normandy heading other way, squadmates disappear once beam hits, no real explanation of what synthesis actually means)
- Sudden, heavy-handed, explicit 'it turns out this game was about synthetics v organics' theme-driving despite a lack of focus as the overarching theme of the series thus far
 
love angry joe.

So the destruction of the mass relays is what everyone is upset about?

I think it's a 50/50 split on that. But according to their own DLC/Codex the Mass Relays being destroyed should've wiped out each system they were in, various other plot holes as well.

My own personal opinion is that if they're going to make more ME games then the Relays should be gone and have the games be more about exploration.
 
Sorry, but that's bullshit. If you read a novel and the novel has a bad ending, do you demand that the writer change it? No. You say, I enjoyed it, but the ending was a bit of a letdown. Same with movies. Same with music, for god's sake. This is entitlement. They finished the game the way that they wanted, telling the story that they wanted to tell. Some people don't like it. That's not anybody's problem to fix; it's the people who don't like the ending's problem to get over.
Two different medium. And bad movies do get savaged by critics and its director will find it hard to gain cred later. Either way, you can't say that the audience just don't "get it". That's BS. It's your problem that you can't tell story that others like or appreciate. And your rudeness will only serve to drive your customer away from your next project.

Also movies don't promise you that you can do so and so but only to reveal that you can't. It's a passive medium that doesn't require your audience active participation. OTOH, this game advertises itself that what you do matters. But it didn't deliver that.
 
love angry joe.

So the destruction of the mass relays is what everyone is upset about?

I think people are upset about the fact that the ending disregards all player choices and decisions and abandons the tropes and themes of the series for...I dunno, nothing.
 
love angry joe.

So the destruction of the mass relays is what everyone is upset about?

It's one of the things that aids in upsetting people, but it's not why people are upset. The Mass Relays could have died and people wouldn't be flipping their shit like this.
 
See what I mean?


But I'll humor your shitty argument. They promised us prerelease to have what was it, 16 different endings? They gave us 1 with pallet swaps.

Based on their promises and statements, are we really not entitled to what we were promised prerelease?

Not really. People promise things. By this logic, Molyneux would have been torn apart by gamers by now. People promise things will be good: they are sometimes not. The 'If you hire somebody to do a job and they do it badly' thing is flawed, as nobody's hiring Bioware to do anything. You're buying an end product that they have created. And they can promise anything and renege on it, because this isn't Kickstarter. Nobody's paid a deposit they can't get back at the start of development; everybody who is actually invested in the success of ME3 is happy; it's a subset of gamers who hate the ending who feel entitled - yes, that word - to more based on things that Bioware have or haven't said or delivered in the past.
 
Two different medium. And bad movies do get savaged by critics and its director will find it hard to gain cred later. Either way, you can't say that the audience just don't "get it". That's BS. It's your problem that you can't tell story that others like or appreciate. And your rudeness will only serve to drive your customer away from your next project.

Also movies don't promise you that you can do so and so but only to reveal that you can't.

Again: rubbish. I've seen trailers for movies with scenes in them that aren't in the final film. Should I storm those castles and demand reparations? Some movies divide critics: some see art movies as dross, others love them. I know somebody who loves Transformers 2. It's a fucking dreadful film, but he loves it. That's fine. Whatever. You didn't like ME3. Okay. So... You know. Move on. Play something else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom