It's cool to be pissed off B)
The ends has a lot less plot holes than people are trying to create.
No... You're just filling them in with speculation.
It's cool to be pissed off B)
The ends has a lot less plot holes than people are trying to create.
The Illusive Man is an anagram of Leash Vent Ilium. Indoctrination theory redeemed.
Oh screw you. That's the laziest way of discounting what people are actually saying.Some people just love to hate.
Some people just love to speculate.Oh screw you. That's the laziest way of discounting what people are actually saying.
It won't be going for long. OT2 will come in to replace it soon.I'm impressed, this thread is still going :O
Bioware bad writing caused an uproar indeed.
Agreed.
Some people just love to hate.
It's cool to be pissed off B)
The ends has a lot less plot holes than people are trying to create.
I'm impressed, this thread is still going :O
Bioware bad writing caused an uproar indeed.
It won't be going for long. OT2 will come in to replace it soon.
Mass Effect 3 Spoiler Thread: Lots of Speculation From Everyone Cont.
What makes me "mad" isn't people saying they disliked the ending, that's an opinion I can take. The thing is people trying to frame everything as a plothole when the majority of it is clearly stated in the game or easily deducible.I avoided the spoilers/saw all the hate/twitter harassment/petitions
all of that made me want to LOVE the ending and be able to say "lulz it's fine fuck you cry babies".
But no it's awful on basically every level.
Among other things, not for the Reapers to go from:What was everyone expecting?
Could we please refrain from these inane reductionistic attempts at subverting anyone's criticisms to "some people just love to hate"? It's incredibly simplistic and narrow-minded, and it sabotages any fruitful epistemic discussion. It's almost worse than your previous drive-by trolling.
It is clear to anyone with a sense of narrative standards that this ending is severely flawed and goes against everything taught in a high school course on simple storytelling.
Harbinger's reaction after the Control ending probably must have been... hilarious. Especially after realizing that Shepard is now the controller.
The issues come from inconsistencies that came from the writer's desire to be as vague as possible. Weather or not potholes exist, is not important. Lazy writing is the one issue several people dislike the ending.What makes me "mad" isn't people saying they disliked the ending, that's an opinion I can take. The thing is people trying to frame everything as a plothole when the majority of it is clearly stated in the game or easily deducible.
I think you twisted his/her words. He said that it may be obvious to see the flaws, but never said that anyone who likes the ending is wrong.You call me for being reductionist and then you say that whoever doesn't think the ending is bad is wrong. That's really deep and open minded, .
What makes me "mad" isn't people saying they disliked the ending, that's an opinion I can take. The thing is people trying to frame everything as a plothole when the majority of it is clearly stated in the game or easily deducible.
You call me for being reductionist and then you say that whoever doesn't think the ending is bad is wrong. That's really deep and open minded, LOL.
You call me for being reductionist and then you say that whoever doesn't think the ending is bad is wrong. That's really deep and open minded, LOL.
I'm convinced you're from Bioware now. Did you even read this?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QT4IUepvrU1pfv_B95oQj0H84DlCTUmzQ_uQh1voTUs/preview?pli=1&sle=true
This ends with that indoctrination bullshit >.>
That's sad, right? It's also sad that it fits so well in light of the ending. A lot of it is reaching, other things might as well be true for how vague the ending is. But the doc brings up a lot more valid points beyond that.This ends with that indoctrination bullshit >.>
I'm impressed, this thread is still going :O
Bioware bad writing caused an uproar indeed.
So? All the inconsistencies pointed out are still valid.This ends with that indoctrination bullshit >.>
I'm convinced you're from Bioware now. Did you even read this?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QT4IUepvrU1pfv_B95oQj0H84DlCTUmzQ_uQh1voTUs/preview?pli=1&sle=true
Maybe someone can copy/paste/remove indoctrination and publish it again. The ammo thing is null since there were other scenes in the game where infinite ammo was available.That's sad, right? It's also sad that in light of the ending. A lot of it is reaching, other things might as well be true for how vague the ending is. But the doc brings up a lot more valid points beyond that.
Really indoctrinated? Possibly.Fuck me, is this guy for real?
This ends with that indoctrination bullshit >.>
I'm not. Reading the first page, I didn't see one complain that I wouldn't categorize as nitpicking. C'mon: why did Harbinger left? He did what every enemy of every game does, if they did check every time to see if the hero is dead there wouldn't be a game to play.
It appeared closer to the beacon then he was a t the explosion!!1 And what if a huge ship just exploded behind Shepard and he was thrown closer to it? Shepard falls unconscious again after entering the Citadel beam. man, his critic is dumb: "Why go to great lengths to create such an atmosphere without reason? " because they friggin wanted. . It seems bizarre how neatly Shepard's armor and helmet were blown off. Fuck me, is this guy for real?
but it did suck
As much as ME3?
"It's inexcusable. Part of what drove me to write this analysis is that it is inconceivable to me that a professional writer could have produced this staggering degree of literary incompetence and I truly want to believe that it's all part of the plan - not necessarily for the sake of the Mass Effect story, but for the sake of my continued faith in human competence."Vamphuntr said:This ends with that indoctrination bullshit >.>
I'm convinced you're from Bioware now. Did you even read this?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QT4IUepvrU1pfv_B95oQj0H84DlCTUmzQ_uQh1voTUs/preview?pli=1&sle=true
1. The guy on the radio saw everyone lying on the ground, assumed they were dead.
2. Rule of drama.
3. Harbinger assumed he killed the ground team or that they were so badly hurted they couldn't do anything anyways.
4. A wizard did it.
5. It's a game.
6. People badly hurt sometimes pass out.
7. The story requires Shepard has bullets for the final scenes.
And so on...
As much as ME3?
I will, not now, but later with more time. Just to really understand what are the problems, because from every plothole stated in this thread, the only ones I can agree with is: "why did the reapers/catalyst wanted to help organics?" and how did your squadmates appeared in the Normady.
image
Not really, the problems are pretty clear to most people.It's like he was nitpicking every single frame just to make volume.
1. The guy on the radio saw everyone lying on the ground, assumed they were dead.
2. Rule of drama.
3. Harbinger assumed he killed the ground team or that they were so badly hurted they couldn't do anything anyways.
4. A wizard did it.
5. It's a game.
6. People badly hurt sometimes pass out.
7. The story requires Shepard has bullets for the final scenes.
And so on...
I can agree with is: "why did the reapers/catalyst wanted to help organics?"
Not really, the problems are pretty clear to most people.
He's not leaving room for discussion, the same thing he's complaining about me. According to him (and most people in this thread) the ending is completely bad and if you don't agree you obviously don't know anything about story telling.I think you twisted his/her words. He said that it may be obvious to see the flaws, but never said that anyone who likes the ending is wrong.
Considering that most people here think a better ending would be the most generic possible, everyone going home and being happy ever after, with no serious sacrifices, I think I'll just not take you seriously.Or you know, you could try to prove that Mac Walters & Co.'s take on the conclusion of a 5-year long trilogy is an example of what would be considered good or even mediocre storytelling, LOL.
The point of the games has always being to entertain the players. As far as I'm concerned, they've succeeded.
Also, [URL="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MST3KMantra]It's just a game, you should really just relax.[/URL]