Zomba13
Member
That is like, super levels of crazy. The real answer is Bioware was lazy and didn't think that the citadel (especially that part) wouldn't have human numbers/letters on its bits.
I, too, don't think they need to change anything. By the time they release a whole separate ending, the game will be out for months or a whole year. People will not care by that point.I mean, at this point I'm sure that whatever they do will piss someone off, either the people that are fine with it, or the rest who will leave just as dissatisfied with a new ending. We'd be in Spoiler OT 3 by then
very good, brother. just let them live in their ignorance and let us believers thrive!
Oh Bioware, we devotees are just counting the days till you show us 'The Truth' and punish the infidels. Take our bodies, souls and...our money of course.
And it's only been two weeks since release.This shit be hitting Dan Brown levels of speculation, y'all.
See Mass Effect 3 is really the dying dream of Squall Leonhart in FFVIII.
That is like, super levels of crazy. The real answer is Bioware was lazy and didn't think that the citadel (especially that part) wouldn't have human numbers/letters on its bits.
I'm sure EA isn't fine with this. Whether BioWare wants to ignore it all they want, they can't.
This has to have some long-term consequences. If they try to make other Mass Effect games/DLC, I wouldn't even touch it. Even if it was free. As much as I love the characters and the universe, to know how it all ends? There's just no desire left to play it.
I can't be the only one who feels this way so EA would be losing out on sales, and we all know the only thing EA cares about it money.
The colors red, green and blue, from an artistic point of view are also profound. They are the three prime colors, with which one can create any other color in the spectrum. Its just a matter of ratio. Different shades would be produced by the increase or decrease of brightness in the pigments. For instance, a 1:1 ratio (equal parts) of red and blue would create a "pure" purple, where as more red than blue would be maroon, and more blue than red would be lilac. Also, a 1:1:1 ratio of all three colors would create white as white is a combination of all colors. There I knew that art history class I took freshman year would come in useful for something.
lol
Easily the best thing to come out of this whole controversy are the theories. The lengths that people will go to rework the ending into something that makes them less rage-filled is a sight to behold.
I think perhaps the thing I want to know most about the ending is why does the Catalyst greet you differently depending on things. Like he's either hostile and all 'Why are you here!?' or he's nice and all 'Wake up'.
Why have the dialouge change? Why? WHY!?
Prime colors? Did they mean primary? Because those would be red, yellow, and blue, not green.Easily the best thing to come out of this whole controversy are the theories. The lengths that people will go to rework the ending into something that makes them less rage-filled is a sight to behold.
Because speculation.I think perhaps the thing I want to know most about the ending is why does the Catalyst greet you differently depending on things. Like he's either hostile and all 'Why are you here!?' or he's nice and all 'Wake up'.
Why have the dialouge change? Why? WHY!?
That 1M1 or 8M8 theory stuff is just weird, mostly trying to speculate dates or whatever.Just when I thought the indoctrination theory was gasping at straws, even crazier people come along.
Also I'm kinda sad they was no boss inside the Geth Consensus. I thought the Reaper would do something to keep me out.
Prime colors? Did they mean primary? Because those would be red, yellow, and blue, not green.
Because speculation.
Doesn't it have to do with the Geth/Quarians/Reputation/EMS/Sexual partner/Ratio?
I ultimately thought that section was a waste of time. They could have just shown the history without the lame level.Also I'm kinda sad they was no boss inside the Geth Consensus. I thought the Reaper would do something to keep me out.
Prime colors? Did they mean primary? Because those would be red, yellow, and blue, not green.
Apparently it was supposed to be a recreation of Rannoch, originally, and you'd have hostile programs trying to keep you out.
I ultimately thought that section was a waste of time. They could have just shown the history without the lame level.
I ultimately thought that section was a waste of time. They could have just shown the history without the lame level.
I ultimately thought that section was a waste of time. They could have just shown the history without the lame level.
Where did the Reapers come from? Why are the Reapers so important? Why do the Reapers get to decide everything?
The A.I. at the end is the answer to the Reaper question. To ask further questions is to dovetail into an infinite regress. You can keep asking "and who created THAT?" ad nauseum.
The biggest problem with the Catalyst isn't that he's a godlike A.I. - it's the silly and all-too-pat dialogue you have with him at the end. You don't get to ask any real pertinent questions outside of stuff the Reapers had already told you, and you don't get to point out the hilarious way in which the Catalyst's own existence contradicts his entire reasoning for the Reapers and the cycle.
I don't know, Shepard's incredibly smug smile right after saying that was good, too "Keela sa'lai" (By which I mean "By the homeworld that I am standing on and you may or may not see in a few hours for yourself, if you aren't idiots." So, your call, are you idiots?) Really, all the Rannoch sequence needed was an opportunity to facepalm in the beginning. The animation is already in the game.The best part of that was ending it with "Keelah sa'lai"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxkHqR1w51E&feature=related
I'd like to know how you go from such great dialogue that really sets up the Reapers in ME 1 to the little boy in 3. The hell happened along the way?
An ending that finally gives closure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vG4EyfXOTJ4
(not sure if posted before)
There should have been a lot more philosophy of A.I. stuff in ME3, especially since that became such a dominant concept with the Geth and Quarians, and the Catalyst after that and his reasoning for the cycle. They only touched on it some in dialogue, and mostly towards the end.
What can change the nature of an A.I.? Better writing.
I did like Javik's staunch belief that every A.I. - and Joker - should be thrown out the airlock.
I wouldn't have minded if EDI got tossed out the airlock.
I wouldn't have minded if EDI got tossed out the airlock.
I wouldn't have minded if EDI got tossed out the airlock.
The Kid should have talked in Soverign voice.
Yeah, sign me up as another indoctrination believer. If Bioware doesn't announce soon that there will be DLC plans to explain the ending, or even ADD a new branch following the red option...then the game was probably rushed and they ran out of time to get a proper ending in place.
Stumbled across this neat little indoctrination vid for the believers, it's not bad:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ythY_GkEBck
It seems you want to go down the hard wayCome to me Indoctrination Bros, let's discuss the endings till the second coming of Shep.
Well I hear the MP is fun, even if it lacks hanar.
But as to the second point of yours I agree. Shepard always questioned everyone throughout all the games and finally you're at the end and you just accept everything at face value. I don't buy it.
I had not seen this extended version.An ending that finally gives closure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vG4EyfXOTJ4
(not sure if posted before)