So is this still below MGS4 or has it warmed its way into your heart?
It's a different kind of hate, and has evolved and changed over time, the significance of its shittiness slowly sinking in.
MGS4 was a catastrophe from start to finish, as far as I'm concerned. For all the shit that series has, MGS4 was the point where I stood up out of my chair and prayed to The Old Ones that nobody lets Kojima write anything again. It's unequivocally awful in almost every conceivable way. There's not a single satisfying, rational, grounded or well written character arc or narrative in the entire game. From a story perspective it's pure shit, and it shouldn't have been. The only cool thing was old Snake.
ME3, on the other hand, for all its own oddities and silliness I loved. I could bitch and moan about a lot of shit, but I liked the shooting, I liked the set pieces, I grew to like the premise and, by large, I loved the narrative. The characters were intriguing, the plot arcs were complete, and even though it was absurd how many cameos showed up, from the perspective of a big fan it was awesome. I tied up all lose ends and got to spend time with the characters I love, auto-pilot dialogue included.
But there's two exceptions to ME3: The intro, and the ending. The intro bothered me in the demo and it still bothers me. I've bitched at length as to why it sucks and what BioWare should have done. The ending though? That...that is the kicker. It, like MGS4, is pure narrative shit.
So I don't know. I've always liked Mass Effect a lot more than the Metal Gear saga, and since I
really loved the actual game of Mass Effect 3 until the ending, I
should hate it much more than MGS4. The higher you climb, the harder you fall. But I don't know. ME3 represents how so much good can be screwed up by one big failure at the end. MGS4 represents how incompetent KojiPro is.
Can anyone even say what Bioware's intentions as a collective entity were though? For all we know, the rest of the studio/writing team might have been completely against the ending and self-indulgent behaviour that Hudson and Walters engaged in.
If a couple of people use their authority to shit on the work of their more talented underlings, does that constitute Bioware's intentions? Or is it just two pseudo-intellectual hacks trying to be clever and failing?
Yeah, I know, but some people have vocalised a dislike for changing the ending because of 'artistic integrity' bla bla and how a changed ending would be a product of fan demands, not the made product, and thus less 'real' or some such shit. I'm just saying I don't agree with that.