You'll see them on those streets going north from the arena as that's where we'd park from, or we'd take the free tram. As for Bills, I've only been to I think 1 bills game in my life. Never noticed it or looked for it. We parked in the grassy fields on some guys house on that residential street where everyone else is doing it.When most your citizens are packing heat and some automatic weapons, you need to escalate your law enforcement response. I don't recall that being too much an issue at the arena, but Bills games yes. Canadian's aren't packing much heat.
This doesn't really have much to do with the typical "mass shooter." They aren't people who would ever have been committed and they aren't revolving door criminals.Open mental asylums and give stronger sentences for crimes.
You'll see them on those streets going north from the arena as that's where we'd park from, or we'd take the free tram. As for Bills, I've only been to I think 1 bills game in my life. Never noticed it or looked for it. We parked in the grassy fields on some guys house on that residential street where everyone else is doing it.
But for Sabres I go to 1-2 games a year and they are always there. A soldier standing in front of a small armoured vehicle both in matching tan/beige camo eyeballs everyone who walks by.
Fuck off.Well, we have never had an event like this in portugal. I actually have never seen a gun outside the hands of law enforcement forces or military.
So, maybe banning weapons is the solution.
Fuck off.
We need more guns and less control.
It is not. The US has existed for 250 years with the same gun culture since the nation was founded but mass shootings didn't become a real problem until the last 20 or so years. This coincides with a number of changes to how crime is punished and mental health treatment is no longer required or involves mandatory confinement
What I'm saying is the guns have been here all along but the mass shootings only became a problem more recently, so maybe let's understand why and fix what caused those to happen
We need more guns and less control.
Will never workWell, we have never had an event like this in portugal. I actually have never seen a gun outside the hands of law enforcement forces or military.
So, maybe banning weapons is the solution.
RIP, when are some folks going to realize easy access to firearms means they *will* be used?
Folks think they are a solution to a problem nowadays, for reasons unknown, and they are ok to use, to solve issues. Very few places have such a ingrained mentality when it comes to firearms. Get in a fight? Pull your gun! Someone strange knocks on your door, use your gun! Wierdo walking on your property? Use your gun! Someone insulted you? Use a gun! Feel insulted and out of place? Use a gun! Unsure when this all started, in the 70's, or so? What changed in the last 250 years, people ask? Media coverage, ands news coverage. Guns are cool and needed.
It is such a mental dissasociation, from fists or knives, swords, to guns, this only exist in a few select nations... Australia had similar issues, they fixed it. :\
I wouldn't worry about gangbangers in theese sort of places, but the crazy one who could buy a gun, go out and shoot people, no background check required, police has no say on the weapon license, no checks or training required at all. You can in some places get quite a nice arsenal, in days. No checks, or oversight, it's a free for all.
Result:
![]()
Yeah i don't think that gun control is the solution to these types of crimes. Guns have been legal in this country for a very long time, and it's only been in the last decades that mass shootings have been an issue.Rhode Island requires background checks on all firearm sales, including private owner sales, a 7 day waiting period is also required. A license, called a Blue Card, is required to purchase a handgun and all ammunition. Somneone must complete and pass a safety exam managed by the RI Department of Environmental Management to be issued a Blue Card.
![]()
Gun laws in Rhode Island - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
We need more guns and less control.
This whole thing has been a cluster fuckSupposedly over 800 cameras on that campus and this is what they got?
Supposedly over 800 cameras on that campus and this is what they got?
I bet a lot of those cameras dont even work.This whole thing has been a cluster fuck
All those heavily armed police standing around in large groups while kids are still barricaded in gyms and libraries?
And yeah all these cameras and this is what you have and no video of them coming in or out of the building or while inside?
The culture has remained the same, yes. But the technology of firearms has changed drastically.I am not. I'm merely stating facts which contradict your position on gun control
I'm going to be honest here. The US owns 50% of the world's guns held by civilians, the aforementioned 400 million or so. Which is more than the population of the whole country. If guns were directly correlated to crime, then the US must surely have 50% of the world's crime? Well, it doesn't. Not even close. So clearly the presence of guns has little to do with the presence of crime? Maybe there are other factors involved?
About 32% of Americans own at least 1 gun. Roughly 43% of Americans live in a household with a gun. That's nearly half of all Americans, living in a household with a gun. And yet while it is true that America has mass shootings, in other countries instead of mass shootings they have mass casualty attacks caused by car rammings. This is especially a problem in Europe. In fact Europe has car ramming mass casualty attacks more often than America has mass shootings. So is the solution "car control"? Should we start banning cars to prevent these attacks?
America is the world's most wealthy and economically successful country because of its unique culture of individualism, freedom, and ambition. Part of that culture since founding is the right for ordinary citizens to own firearms with few restrictions. The US is the only country on Earth which codifies the right to bear arms into its founding document. The Founding Fathers were quite explicit when they stated the right to bear arms is critical to the maintenance of a free democratic state, even with all the drawbacks of ordinary citizens having weapons of war. Look at the governmental structure of China, the current superpower which compete with he US, for an example otherwise. Look at what is happening in Europe for an example of what happens when citizens have zero power to check the government's power. The US is also the country responsible for 25% of the world's GDP. This is not coincidence. American exceptionalism exists because of the nation's ideals which are quite different from almost every other nation on the Earth and it happens that part of these ideals also involves citizens owning firearms
I'm not going to say much more because I don't want to be banned today but the reality is America is what it is because of it's founding ideals, one of which happens to be enshrinement of the US Second Amendment. 250 years later, the unique US gun culture remains as strong as it was since the nation was founded. If you think the 32% of Americans, fully 1 in 3, who own guns will just willingly arbitrarily give them up when firearms ownership is such an integral part of the nation's culture then I have some cheap bridges to sell you. So maybe we should look for real solutions to the problem of mass shootings?
So there is a problem, so let's do nothing to solve the problem, because there is already a problem.As an avid gun owner I don't even know what the answer is to stop this now with the huge number of guns and violent people on our streets
Absolutely rubbish take with no basis in reality, but that won't stop you.America is the world's most wealthy and economically successful country because of its unique culture of individualism, freedom, and ambition. Part of that culture since founding is the right for ordinary citizens to own firearms with few restrictions.
Another candlelit vigil, attack will be condemned, "Something Must be done!!" a week will pass, apathy sets in, the cycle begins anew.something something thoughts and prayers
clearly video games' fault.
RIP to all the victims
Last few weeks beg to differ with the leaks of trumps plans and his constant bashing.the European pastime of shitting on the US
![]()
Could have fooled me with the US fascination on UK/France public affairs and continuous "shitting on".the European pastime of shitting on the US
![]()
Ask yourself about the pro rata gun crime in Switzerland and the absolute arsenal the average Swiss person has at home. Calling it restricted is a bit of a joke considering the kind of weaponry they have. Good luck at invading Switzerland with missile launchers in the mountains, a trained and heavily armed population, tons of nuclear calibre shelters, and a mountainous and woods covered region locals know well…Of course not. Other countries also have guns with civilians.
But they are restricted and controlled.
Ask yourself about the pro rata gun crime in Switzerland and the absolute arsenal the average Swiss person has at home. Calling it restricted is a bit of a joke considering the kind of weaponry they have. Good luck at invading Switzerland with missile launchers in the mountains, a trained and heavily armed population, tons of nuclear calibre shelters, and a mountainous and woods covered region locals know well…
![]()
Switzerland has a stunningly high rate of gun ownership — here's why it doesn't have mass shootings
Switzerland hasn't had a mass shooting since 2001, when a man stormed the local parliament in Zug, killing 14 people and then himself.www.independent.co.uk
These kind of articles quote the fact people are trained on how to use them and have mandatory military training (repeated).
Sure, it helps reduce accidental deaths, but a country where 1:4 or more has assault rifle caliber weapons and knows how to use them and yet has only like 46 gun related deaths (2016) points at something else culturally that th U.S. cannot or does not want to address.
I think the second point is very minor, it remains the cultural one as the major one and the fabric of society.A few major differences. The Swiss are a very civilized people.
And they actually have a well regulated militia.
The US has neither of these things.
If you're talking school shootings, I'd most likely agree with you. But if you're talking mass shootings in general, you're definitely wrong there.It's not the criminals who are doing these types of shootings
And will I have any trouble doing that if I wanted to kill someone? How about using dad's guns for the shootings?Rhode Island requires background checks on all firearm sales, including private owner sales, a 7 day waiting period is also required. A license, called a Blue Card, is required to purchase a handgun and all ammunition. Somneone must complete and pass a safety exam managed by the RI Department of Environmental Management to be issued a Blue Card.
![]()
Gun laws in Rhode Island - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Yes but at the same time during the American Revolution, private soon to be former British citizens owned warships and cannons. There was no official standing army of the colonies at the time, all the war materiel was privately owned. Much of it was from private collections, or purchased from European powers who wanted to see the British defeated like France. So in a strange and unironic sense, the weapons they had back then make the small arms citizens have today, even though they are certainly more advanced than the muskets of that period, look like toys by comparisonThe culture has remained the same, yes. But the technology of firearms has changed drastically.
None of the mass shooters are mentally healthy people. In USA you get mentally unstable people roaming free and released multiple multiple times. Colleges and universities and schools are notoriously hard on psyche - especially in the modern age of media.This doesn't really have much to do with the typical "mass shooter." They aren't people who would ever have been committed and they aren't revolving door criminals.
The issue has always been that while gun control laws prevent law abiding citizens from owning guns, criminals weren't planning on following the law anyways so why would they care about obtaining their guns illegally?And will I have any trouble doing that if I wanted to kill someone? How about using dad's guns for the shootings?
Yet the US wants to dismantle the EU cause we're wokethe European pastime of shitting on the US
![]()
Sweden has incredibly strict gun laws, but criminals still go packing. One journalist tried to buy one as part of an article and was able to buy it within an hour, if I remember correctly.Of course not. Other countries also have guns with civilians.
But they are restricted and controlled.
Honestly I dont know the answerSo there is a problem, so let's do nothing to solve the problem, because there is already a problem.
You know the answer, you just don't like it.