Trump expanding the war on domestic terrorism by including ALL OTHER violent left-wing organizations
It's about time to reign down on the violent left-wing groups
It's a meta analysis by someone who has been paid to be an expert witness in litigation against Tylenol for causing autism.
No? It shows old boomer liberals & conservatives see eye to eye whereas there's a huge gap between younger ones.
No, it shows that old people are less prone to justify acts of violence, but for young people the liberals are FAR more willing to justify acts of violence. Young conservatives are less prone than their older counterparts.
The timing of the poll probably has something to do with it. But honestly what is wrong with young conservatives, otherwise? Doesn't the second amendment partially exist to allow resistance to the government? Wasn't the US founded by political violence? Us old bastards just want piece and quiet and status quo but young kids shouldn't be capitulating so easy.
I think this is more due to the fact that social media deshumanised people who don't have the same belief system as you, and the more you spend time scrolling, the more you're likely to feel less empathy towards people on the other side of the political spectrum. And with people who grew up exclusively with social media, it is even easier (than let's say us "old people" who still remember a bit how the world was before doom-scrolling).
Agreed, but this "American Frontline Nurses" is an anti covid vax group?
They appear to be a political covid disinformation group.
Yes, in the US they often refer to drugs by brand names instead of the actual drug for some reason. (the reason is marketing)
No, it shows that as the age goes younger, Liberals are more ok with violence. It's not through the years graphs, it's separated into age groups.
This doesn't explain the gap between young conservatives and young liberals though. Why would young conservatives be less likely to say violence can be justified compared to older generations, whereas young liberals are massively more likely than older generations (and conservatives) to say it can be justified?
But everything on social media is fake or botted unless I find it funny.
Oy, really? horse de-wormer? Ivermectin has been given safely for humans for more than 20 years. It's for scabies and stuff like that.
Acetaminophen has been given safely for 150 years.
I had a family member in the hospital hours away from being put on a ventilator before they gave him invermectin as a last chance attempt. 2 hours later he was discharged. Low success rate, but insanely low chance of negative effects. No real reason not to try it.
Maybe that is supposed to be the implication of 'citizens' in the question, but it should be clearer.
I grew up in a very left-leaning country and my view of American politics was mostly based on Jon Stewart and left-wing newspapers. At some point in my twenties I decided to read more conservative news sites to get a better picture of the conservative mentality and realized that I had rarely if ever heard that side. Sites like The Federalist, National Review and Townhall. Not Foxnews. It opened up my eyes to many things and so it never surprised me or didn't make sense when Trump won. In my country people were shocked and couldn't comprehend his victory.
Doesn't the woman literally say "dying of liver failure on a ventilator in the ICU?
Doesn't the woman literally say "dying of liver failure on a ventilator in the ICU?
Acetaminophen is TOXIC AS SHIT, so only relatively low doses are even remotely "safe". Only FOUR GRAMS, basically 10x a single 350mg pill, can cause liver failure.
Not sure where you were going but I'd respond that for decades now, conservative movements that "act out" got a disproportionately harsh smack down, which trained conservatives that if they want to advance their agenda, they gotta do it in peaceful ways. Plus overall the "peaceful ways" has worked for them so mo need to take to the streets.
Which would also be true for Ivermectin, even more true given it's shorter time available. It has known pathways for neural toxicity.
Most drugs have side effects, and bad ones at that. They are all on a risk:reward balance beam.
If the messenger is someone who gets paid $150k to say it has a new risk then I am going to struggle to accept that message.
