Following the live updates here, seems to suggest it would be?Would a majority of ten for ConLibDUP be any better? (Probably not)
Zero. They are almost always hilariously wrong.
1992 was the same situation.Yeah, I'm calling bullshit on those numbers.
None of the polling has suggested there would such a huge landslide in favour of the Tories and while I can agree that there might be some shy Tories out there, is it really reasonable to believe there are that many?
Didn't one of the guys running the exit pole say it would probably be widely inaccurate this time?
All those UKIP voters chickening out at the last minute and stopping a split vote?
BBC have hired the same graphics team who did the crowd for Forza 4
Please be wrong, if Cameron gets back in then all the shit he's put the poor through for the past few years will be allowed to continue - and hell do more i bet, much more - if this is true then i loose my house (and access to my daughter) for sure.
Surely the general public don't hate the poor this much right?, i mean for the love of god be wrong.
Oh god the 'legitimacy' nonsense starts early.
that lib dem collapse
clegg gonna keep his seat?
Lol my bet is FUCKED btw.
This is like an E3 thread.
BBC have hired the same graphics team who did the crowd for Forza 4
Michael Gove considers a potential minority result to give them 'considerable authority'. Yeah, okay then.
First Past The PostLike, how are these figures even possible?
If the swing seats are *REALLY* close, would it take that many to make the difference?Yeah, I'm calling bullshit on those numbers.
None of the polling has suggested there would such a huge landslide in favour of the Tories and while I can agree that there might be some shy Tories out there, is it really reasonable to believe there are that many?
You're not alone. I'm still on the fence, despite having voted.Wow...is there anyone here supporting the tories except me?!