maquiladora
Member
Ed is gone.
S¡mon;163165435 said:Yes, I understand how it works. And surely there will be enough people who consider the current system (with districts) to be the correct system. But I feel like the system shouldn't work like that. In my opinion, it should work like this
Code:(number of votes for your political party) / (combined number of votes of all political parties) * 100 = (percentage of seats the political party get)
In no way I find it fair that 3.8 million people are not represented at all (0 seats), while 1.5 million people are represented with 56 seats.
Am I that crazy to think that's not fair?
I'm not from the United States.
I get the idea behind the system, and I can see why people would be in favor of such a system. But 3.8 million people will not be represented at all, while 1.5 million people will be quite heavily represented with 56 seats.
I agree and I don't. The local representation is also important to me, so what happens there? Do we have a new house for locally elected MPs?
Because most people see it as voting for a party and a leader rather than someone to represent them and their community, the voting system does need a change to represent that, but that first part of my post is rarely answered.
The fuck you, I got mine mentality is strong in the UK at the moment it seems.
Scotland should become the Canada to England's USA.
lmao
we've just elected a wolf in sheep's clothing.
[edit] sorry, you've just elected a wolf in sheep's clothing.
If so then England can only reflect on its perception of progressive politics. If a feeling that Scotland can't help shake up the political front exists in "no ones" mind, then it doesn't matter what we voted or how things went, England simply wanted the conservatives back in.
I agree and I don't. The local representation is also important to me, so what happens there? Do we have a new house for locally elected MPs?
Because most people see it as voting for a party and a leader rather than someone to represent them and their community, the voting system does need a change to represent that, but that first part of my post is rarely answered.
This thread is too depressing for me, all this doom and gloom talk.
So much bad shit about to happen and Tories being right wing and in power is the least of that issue. The issue runs deeper with the public who have gradually shifted towards right and put liberalism back by years, all based on fear mongering. They voted a party that failed them and made them majority. A party that despite all of that has won by a landslide...that is frightening.
SNP is basically the case of Scotland getting back at westminister for all those years, and honestly Westminster had it coming....but it also makes things shit for UK with an Us vs Them game and will most certainly lead to further issues.
I really, really like Ed.
Can't believe the result
Unprecedented cuts in the next government and they still get a majority?
NHS will be gone, local councils ravaged, inequality to widen even further, poverty, foodbanks, education system decimated and the demonization of the welfare state.
Appalling.
If so then England can only reflect on its perception of progressive politics. If a feeling that Scotland can't help shake up the political front exists in "no ones" mind, then it doesn't matter what we voted or how things went, England simply wanted the conservatives back in.
You can thank the "shy" Tories, if you can find one. They're notoriously sly and evasive creatures.
Thank you for you response. I must admit that I didn't realize there's such a big divide between Wales, Scotland, Northern-Ireland and England. As I mentioned earlier in a post, I might not have enough knowledge about British politics to continue this discussion. I find it very interesting, though, how you (and others) think about this problem. All I can say is that I hope that something will change, so more British citizens will be represented in the Parliament.I think in the UK that this would create an even bigger divide between Wales/Scotland/NI and England than there is now. You would have the percentage of the vote we account for counting for much less to the point your vote would be almost irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. A party like UKIP that has almost 0 support outwith England ends up basically doing what you are moaning about the SNP doing here, it just switches it around.
You'd need some sort of cut off too, so you would end up with Con, Lab, UKIP, SNP and maybe the Lib Dems represented, the smaller parties that have won like 1 seat or 4 seats would have too small a number of votes in the new system and not be represented at all. Wales and NI would suffer in this system.
Personally, a tory gov't probably suits my interests. My job is providing tax consultancy services to the wealthy. I'm comfortable financially and I'm invested in the London property bubble and I still voted Labour.
It was a mistake to pick Ed
I like him now but his brother would have done a lot better
This is primarily where that idea falls apart for me too.
So they get that many seats, how is it then decided who fills those seats? Assuming the leader of the majority party becomes the PM do they then pick their cabinet and assign seats? Also what if it's a very minor win? Does the leader of that party get it automatically or does it still require some higher percentage? And what about my local rep? I may not have voted for the tories but at least I have Labour representation in my constituency.
Yup, Both the conservatives and labour had 3 terms each from 1979-2005. It's been a constant back and forth between the two parties for a long-ass time now. Been that way ever since the 1920's judging by the table of election results and it doesn't look set to change anytime soon.
The fuck you, I got mine mentality is strong in the UK at the moment it seems.
Yup, pretty much the same with me. I'm a company director... but I know I can take the hit financially, and I was willing to.
I'm from outside the UK and am just wondering if dismantling the NHS is a real possibility for the Tories. I know they'll continue to make terrible cuts, but I hope that the NHS is big enough to endure and eventually mend.
Huh, that's pretty surprising.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/farage-loses-ukip-westminster-bid-fails-094441951.html#DKxz3mm
So with Farage now gone, seems Cameron can breathe a little easier about any referendum and use an out of having out causing instability to the economy'recovery' to not have one in 2017.
I really, really want a follow-up episode for Ballot Monkeys.
Was HIGNFY filmed before the exit poll?
Yup, pretty much the same with me. I'm a company director... but I know I can take the hit financially, and I was willing to.
I really, really want a follow-up episode for Ballot Monkeys.
Was HIGNFY filmed before the exit poll?
Yeah i can image that his idea of 'protecting' is to have private business 'helping out' with specific services until the whole thing is private.It depends on David Cameron's definition of 'protect the NHS from spending cuts'.