• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Pleasure

Gold Member
40Oz Pour One Out GIF
You gotta hit em with the Mexican birthday song
 

feynoob

Banned
My stupid ass is confused on how this is getting higher, when the deal is basically going to die after one month.

Activision Blizzard Inc
NASDAQ: ATVI


81.97 USD +0.52 (0.64%)today
Closed: Jun 16, 5:13 PM EDT • Disclaimer
After hours 82.00 +0.030 (0.037%)

GHG GHG how is this possible? Is it due to Diablo 4?
 
Drop the persecution complex.
For as pro-MS as the other site is, you guys are kidding yourselves if you don't realize this place is on the opposite end of the spectrum.

Suddenly everyone is onboard with how relatively close we are to cloud being a major factor in gaming after years of thread after thread shitting on it here.

On top of that virtually anyone with an opinion contrary to the majority is now a shill. And now it's reached the point of people "not adding to the discussion" with those posts but hold on let's add more posts that are just gifs because that certainly does, lol.
 
Last edited:

feynoob

Banned
For as pro-MS as the other site is, you guys are kidding yourselves if you don't realize this place is on the opposite end of the spectrum.

Suddenly everyone is onboard with how relatively close we are to cloud being a major factor in gaming after years of thread after thread shitting on it here.

On top of that virtually anyone with an opinion contrary to the majority is now a shill. And now it's reached the point of people "not adding to the discussion" with those posts but hold on let's add more posts that are just gifs because that certainly does, lol.
My friend, this is a gaming forum. Don't take anything here seriously.
Most of us will go back to our boring days once this saga ends.
 

reinking

Gold Member
For as pro-MS as the other site is, you guys are kidding yourselves if you don't realize this place is on the opposite end of the spectrum.

Suddenly everyone is onboard with how relatively close we are to cloud being a major factor in gaming after years of thread after thread shitting on it here.

On top of that virtually anyone with an opinion contrary to the majority is now a shill. And now it's reached the point of people "not adding to the discussion" with those posts but hold on let's add more posts that are just gifs because that certainly does, lol.
I can see where you can form that opinion but there have been very real shills exposed here. As for cloud gaming, I still hope that is not the future, but it was MS internal documents that made cloud gaming an issue for the regulators.
 
Last edited:

tryDEATH

Member
There are 3 consoles: Xbox, PlayStation, Nintendo.

The argument was about COD's impact on consoles.

COD is available only on two consoles: Xbox and PlayStation.

So, of course, Nintendo was going to be separated. What else do you suggest should happen here? You're measuring the impact of COD's exclusivity on consoles, so why would you measure it on a console that doesn't even have COD to begin with?
At no point did MS go out and say that CoD will become an exclusive Xbox/PC game. From the start they wanted to offer guarantees to Sony and expanded CoD's reach to the Switch. The mergers impact on consoles overall when it came to CoD would only be positive.
 

tryDEATH

Member
It's certainly a new term to describe something we've all known for a long time.

To pretend like Nintendo who no longer gets 3rd party support like they used to is in the same segment as Microsoft and Sony is purposefully ignorant.

Can you play CoD on Switch? Madden? Elden Ring? Cyberpunk? Jedi Survivor? Street Fighter 6?

PC is more analogous to the console market, but the methodology of buying and support is completely different from the console market. There isn't a central manufacturer of PCs, and the profits are more broken down and decentralized among multiple figures; Valve, Nvidia, AMD, Microsoft, and software developers.

Rarely are there high-profile games that are exclusive to PC aside from games developed specifically by Valve like Half-life Alyx or developed by indie developers.

Sony spent nearly half a billion dollars buying Gakai in 2012. They spent 380 million dollars which was more than they bought Insomniac for especially given inflation. They bought into the cloud but also realized that the ecosystem isn't there yet. That doesn't mean it isn't massively important. It's certainly a struggle but when the underlying technology allows it to be a thing, it completely removes the console sale from the calculation. It's an absolute game changer, which can't be ignored. Consoles struggled to get online as well, but when it did, it also changed things completely. And that was something that already had a poc in PC gaming...

Cloud is what will unlock handheld and smart tvs. Sony could very well put a PS5 chipset into a TV, but the chipset would have to become significantly smaller and easier to cool. The processors currently in smart tvs aren't anywhere close to getting the job done and that's not changing anytime soon. But it'll be the console manufacturers who unlock cloud in these areas, not TV manufacturers. Maybe Apple could be an exception there.
I certainly didn't consider that sort of classification. I considered it simply a shift in each companies vision of what they wanted to do with their consoles, not that they wanted their own classification and separate themselves from the gaming market and corner them selves as a niche market. PS went with VR and Nintendo went with portability at the end of the day they still make games and often you can play the same game on all 4 platforms with varying graphics and features based on the systems power. The biggest games in the last 5 years have been available on all platforms with Fortnite. The reason why the games you mentioned aren't on Nintendo is due to the businesses making a financial decision, not because they are impossible to make on that platform.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
For as pro-MS as the other site is, you guys are kidding yourselves if you don't realize this place is on the opposite end of the spectrum.

Suddenly everyone is onboard with how relatively close we are to cloud being a major factor in gaming after years of thread after thread shitting on it here.

On top of that virtually anyone with an opinion contrary to the majority is now a shill. And now it's reached the point of people "not adding to the discussion" with those posts but hold on let's add more posts that are just gifs because that certainly does, lol.

Those are some really poor assumptions. This thread had a lot more debate from those in favor of the acquisition until the CMA decided to block. After that, some up and disappeared. It is what it is.

I don't know who here is saying cloud gaming becoming a major market any time soon. The judgement of the CMA is based on the future of that market. Both the EU and the CMA called cloud gaming "nascent" and yet both said there are problems with this acquisition in that space. And while you generalize those here "shitting on it here", I've had plenty of discussions on this very site with those who say cloud gaming is the inevitable future of gaming. So that generalization just doesn't work.

How are you any better generalizing anyone who is against the acquisition as conducting a shill witch hunt though? That's no more accurate than folks with "contrary opinions" being shills. It's these meta commentary posts like yours that I think are not particularly useful.

As far as the gifs.....this you?

 

GHG

Gold Member
My stupid ass is confused on how this is getting higher, when the deal is basically going to die after one month.

Activision Blizzard Inc
NASDAQ: ATVI


81.97 USD +0.52 (0.64%)today
Closed: Jun 16, 5:13 PM EDT • Disclaimer
After hours 82.00 +0.030 (0.037%)

GHG GHG how is this possible? Is it due to Diablo 4?

Number of factors:
  • The current US stock market is bullish. As the inflows in the indexes (SPY/QQQ are the main ones) continue to increase the fund managers are forced to buy the underlyings that make up those indexes. ATVI makes up 0.16% and 0.42% of SPY and QQQ respectively.
  • The company has recently reported strong earnings and their forecasts remain strong.
  • The factors that caused the stock price the drop are no longer a focus.
  • Strong performance from Diablo 4 and continued strong performance from COD.
  • $3b gets added to an already strong balance sheet if the deal fails.
If the deal doesn't go through I don't think the stock moves much from it's current levels. Due to the length of time that the regulatory process has taken the stock now has a very strong floor (demand zone) in the range of $70-$80. It would take something monumental to get this stock to go below $70 now.

Once all is said and done (if it doesn't go through) it's not unfeasible to imagine the stock comfortably trading above the agreed deal price of $95 a share in the next 18-24 months. People forget, but before the scandals started to surface this was a stock that was trading in the $90—$105 dollars range for a 6 month period between December 2020 and July 2021.

Overall as a business they are very much in a no-lose position. It's just the executive board (Kotick, Lulu, etc) that stand to gain the most in the short term from the deal going through, so obviously they will be pushing hard for it.
 
At no point did MS go out and say that CoD will become an exclusive Xbox/PC game. From the start they wanted to offer guarantees to Sony and expanded CoD's reach to the Switch. The mergers impact on consoles overall when it came to CoD would only be positive.
This bullshit again. Just like they kept all of Bethesda games multiplat.. after Phil said games wouldn't be made exclusive too.

The lie dispenser only offered that to help get the deal through. Cod was 100% going to be exclusive like everything else.

Sole purpose of having all the cod clowns who only buy and play cod sub to gamepass. Would probably add 10 million subs.
 

GHG

Gold Member
For as pro-MS as the other site is, you guys are kidding yourselves if you don't realize this place is on the opposite end of the spectrum.

Suddenly everyone is onboard with how relatively close we are to cloud being a major factor in gaming after years of thread after thread shitting on it here.

On top of that virtually anyone with an opinion contrary to the majority is now a shill. And now it's reached the point of people "not adding to the discussion" with those posts but hold on let's add more posts that are just gifs because that certainly does, lol.

And please tell us, what did you think you were adding with this post? What do you think you're contributing?

Is it informative? No.
Is it educational? No.
Is it entertaining? No.
Does it serve as a basis for a discussion/debate on the subject at hand? No.

So in summary:

Sad Samantha Bee GIF
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
For as pro-MS as the other site is, you guys are kidding yourselves if you don't realize this place is on the opposite end of the spectrum.

Suddenly everyone is onboard with how relatively close we are to cloud being a major factor in gaming after years of thread after thread shitting on it here.

On top of that virtually anyone with an opinion contrary to the majority is now a shill. And now it's reached the point of people "not adding to the discussion" with those posts but hold on let's add more posts that are just gifs because that certainly does, lol.

Cloud is growing but it’s still a small market in proportion. People’s opinions on cloud now doesn’t really matter much in relation to where these companies want to take it in the near and medium term.

It’s a bit like remote play, which wasn’t so hot years ago but now it works extremely well.

We can talk about the merits of blocking the deal on the basis of cloud. It was a surprise, but it’s also a surprise that console is not a problem even in markets where they are very competitive.

You want to talk about that other forum, well the narrative being pushed there now is that somehow PC and consoles are the same market. Well that’s just ridiculous.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
That's a real gotcha moment since I am not the person complaining about who is or isn't "adding to the discussion."

Your discussions don't change what the prevailing opinion of cloud gaming here.

Why don't you post the other image that I posted in this thread?

Oh yeah, that's right, it made fun of how silly Sony's assumptions about what MS could possibly do to sabotage COD on PS so I got banned for it.

Guess it didn't add to the rigjt side of the discussion.

I honestly don't care if this thing goes through since I don't play COD or any other game ABK makes. Then again, maybe it'll be worth the downfall of civilization for some "fReE" GamePass games.

No, you are the person complaining about the discussion as a whole. If you want to address someone in particular then feel free, but that's not what you are doing.

The discussions on cloud gaming show there is some debate on the matter. Whether it is the "prevailing opinion" or not is irrelevant. You presented one side as if it is the only side. It isn't. Like I said, poor assumptions on your part.

So your contribution to this thread has been a gif, a pic and two posts whining about everything including gifs and pics.

jennifer lawrence ok GIF
 

tryDEATH

Member
This bullshit again. Just like they kept all of Bethesda games multiplat.. after Phil said games wouldn't be made exclusive too.

The lie dispenser only offered that to help get the deal through. Cod was 100% going to be exclusive like everything else.

Sole purpose of having all the cod clowns who only buy and play cod sub to gamepass. Would probably add 10 million subs.
It isn't bullshit MS offered a 10 year guarantee right away to Sony, which Sony rejected themselves and isn't even considered an issue of exclusivity with either the EC or CMA.

There was no such offer or even talk when Bethesda was acquired. They clearly stated games that are on those platforms would stay there, no mention of Starfield, Redfall, or any future game from Bethesda on PS/Nintendo unless MS choose otherwise.
 

The Pleasure

Gold Member
I think we would have to see the post to make that determination for ourselves. There have been plenty of posts throwing shade at Sony and their "stupid shit" throughout this thread. Don't pretend that's not the case.

I'd tone down the persecution complex bullshit though if I were you. Mods seem to have had enough of that.

Jimmy Fallon Idk GIF by The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon
What you shoulda said is that Daddy moderator will lower ITS ASS on you.
lnBQ31C.jpg
 

feynoob

Banned
- July 18th 2023: The end of the second extension and final outside date in the merger agreement. ABK could quit by then and MS would have to pay a termination fee of $3,000,000,000. The parties could extended or even amend the merger agreement.

I think we have a great song for this day.
 
Last edited:

RickMasters

Member
This bullshit again. Just like they kept all of Bethesda games multiplat.. after Phil said games wouldn't be made exclusive too.

The lie dispenser only offered that to help get the deal through. Cod was 100% going to be exclusive like everything else.

Sole purpose of having all the cod clowns who only buy and play cod sub to gamepass. Would probably add 10 million subs.
He said “case by case basis”. Not “ games wouldn’t be made exclusive”



I know Phil does a lot of double speak but that was pretty clear to most people. And for 7Bn I wouldn’t be putting those games on anything but my own platforms anyway. Common sense if you are trying to grow your own customer base,
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
He said “case by case basis”. Not “ games wouldn’t be made exclusive”



I know Phil does a lot of double speak but that was pretty clear to most people. And for 7Bn I wouldn’t be putting those games on anything but my own platforms anyway. Common sense if you are trying to grow your own customer base,
1) Phil said, before the acquisition, that the Bethesda acquisition was not done to take their games off other platforms. Then, after the acquisition closed, he said that the acquisition was done for exclusive games.

2) They did submit to regulators that they had no financial incentive to make Zenimax games exclusive (no mention of case by case at all). The same thing they submitted to regulators during the ABK acquisition, i.e., they have no financial incentive to make ABK games exclusive.

ZuCtOfy.jpg
iyvXDs2.jpg
 

graywolf323

Member
He said “case by case basis”. Not “ games wouldn’t be made exclusive”



I know Phil does a lot of double speak but that was pretty clear to most people. And for 7Bn I wouldn’t be putting those games on anything but my own platforms anyway. Common sense if you are trying to grow your own customer base,
case by case but they’ve sure made it sound like even Elder Scrolls VI will be exclusive while claiming through this that COD is too big to be exclusive

yet Skyrim sold 60m copies and Xbox seems fully willing to make the next one exclusive 🤷🏼‍♂️ so what ‘case’ would they actually make a game multiplatform from Bethesda? Redfall is a co-op shooter yet one of the first things they did was cancel the PS5 version
 
Last edited:

Pelta88

Member
Fuck the acquisition. We need to nominate GHG GHG to create a stock market/trading OT

It's not like you guys haven't learned and had some sound investing advice from him.
 
Last edited:
case by case but they’ve sure made it sound like even Elder Scrolls VI will be exclusive while claiming through this that COD is too big to be exclusive

yet Skyrim sold 60m copies and Xbox seems fully willing to make the next one exlusive 🤷🏼‍♂️ so what ‘case’ would they actually make a game multiplatform from Bethesda? Redfall is a co-op shooter yet one of the first things they did was cancel the PS5 version

I'm definitely not expecting to see any Bethesda games on PlayStation. Microsoft can do what they want with them but it does make regulators ask them questions about this.
 

GHG

Gold Member
Fuck the acquisition. We need to nominate GHG GHG to create a stock market/trading OT

It's not like you guys haven't learned and had some sound investing advice from him.

There's already one in the OT section mate, it just doesn't get much interest at all.

Don't think it's a topic that interests most people here unfortunately.
 

Pelta88

Member
There's already one in the OT section mate, it just doesn't get much interest at all.

Don't think it's a topic that interests most people here unfortunately.

Do you remember earlier in this thread when certain folk thought that Microsoft's share price couldn't drop?

We've come a long way since then. I think they are ready :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: GHG

PaintTinJr

Member
I think we have a great song for this day.

It depends which side of the deal.

I could maybe see Microsoft's Frat house attempt to buy ATVI being block to have a more melancholy tune - like this Sony Music published number by The Script.

The lyrics could be tweaked to apply to many aspects of the deal. Though I image the most literal one for some here might be "her" in the track as a reference to Lulu :)

 

bender

What time is it?
For as pro-MS as the other site is, you guys are kidding yourselves if you don't realize this place is on the opposite end of the spectrum.

Suddenly everyone is onboard with how relatively close we are to cloud being a major factor in gaming after years of thread after thread shitting on it here.

On top of that virtually anyone with an opinion contrary to the majority is now a shill. And now it's reached the point of people "not adding to the discussion" with those posts but hold on let's add more posts that are just gifs because that certainly does, lol.

 

Banjo64

cumsessed
On top of that virtually anyone with an opinion contrary to the majority is now a shill.

Orrrrr we’ve just caught Florian in here actually shilling.

Aaaand it’s blatantly obvious when ancient Neo accounts pop up, or accounts with 200 posts over the past 5-10 years show up just to shill for this acquisition and contribute nothing else to this forum.

Aaaand they all have the same dim witted writing style, ignore counter points rather than engage honestly, none of them set profile pictures because this is their job etc etc.

Pretty easy to identify to be honest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom