bender
What time is it?
No t-shirt?
Finally we get to see Phil in his natural habitat.
Look at those fingers.

No t-shirt?
Finally we get to see Phil in his natural habitat.
I think the judge has emptied all the work of the FTC lawyer.
My boys been comfort eating throughout this ordeal. No judgement, I have a dad bod too.
Coffee in one hand, water in another....say what you want but this man knows he's a Boss.
I think the judge has emptied all the work of the FTC lawyer.
Spicy.
I am a lawyer (UK, though).
When you act as a witness and give evidence under oath, you are obviously required to tell the truth. If it can be demonstrated that you knowingly lied about points of material fact, you can face criminal charges.
But he’s making statements about MS future strategy that can only reasonably be levied against the company itself.
The logical conclusion of a single executive being responsible is that the moment they leave the company, that company is no longer required to honour those statements. It would make an absolute mockery of the whole judicial process.
I’m not saying that a company might not be stupid enough to try that. They could go exclusive and then claim Phil was a simpleton who didn’t know what he was talking about but, and I can’t stress this point enough, they would get torn to absolute fucking pieces.
CoD is not going exclusive.
I wish I listed to it instead of reading along. Viewing would be better. Sometimes judges interject questions in frustration when they believe someone is being evasive. Tone and body language can tell a lot.well, lets hope the FTC lawyers bring this up because i dont have a good feeling about this since it came directly from the judge.
We should be off again at any minute
anyone has another link so I don't have to listen to this crazy chill?
If we have to suffer through the smooth brain, then so do you.anyone has another link so I don't have to listen to this crazy chill?
Nah, just boomer dad clothes.No gamer shirt from Phil today?
Is there any proof that Notch made them do this? I keep hearing this but I've never seen any source on it.Wish the FTC lawyer had pushed back on this.
Just ask why they cant put language to make it perpetually multiplatform like Notch made them do for Minecraft.
I prefer to suffer through this smooth ass....If we have to suffer through the smooth brain, then so do you.
Your alternative is ratchetness. Pick one.
![]()
Activision Tells Employees FTC Claims Are 'Factually Weak and Legally a Stretch' - IGN
Activision Blizzard communications officer Lulu Meservey called the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s argument “factually weak and legally a stretch” in comments made to employees on Wednesday.www.ign.com
![]()
Very. Emotionally led tarddlers.Are these guys dumb to keep repeating this shit?
The proof was earlier when Phil Spencer’s emails said he wishes Minecraft Dungeons could be exclusive and that he’s trying everything he can to work around it.Is there any proof that Notch made them do this? I keep hearing this but I've never seen any source on it.
He was the hand model for Arkane.
Might be the smallest window in video game historyThat collar is a timed exclusive to his neck.
He delivered a prepared statement (likely agonised over by MS lawyers for days).Regardless of your final point regarding PS5 COD, you cannot legally force a company to stick to what an executive said at a preliminary injunction hearing, specially if he leaves the company. Either way it contemplates PS5 alone and nothing else regarding parity or whatever.
You have to find precedence for that by the way, and if you find precedence, my money is on a measly fine having been paid.
Now can the judge use that for her decision regarding denying FTC’s prelim an injunction while forgoing every other point of concern? Absolutely.
Why are you creating a situation that literally never happened?If Sony had bought Square before the Embracer deal they would have the exclusivity deal on:
- Final Fantasy
- Dragon Quest
- Hitman
- Tomb Raider
- Just Cause
- Deus Ex
- Kingdom Hearts
- Parasite Eve
- Nier
Holy shit I missed this. I'm joining the party late.The proof was earlier when Phil Spencer’s emails said he wishes Minecraft Dungeons could be exclusive and that he’s trying everything he can to work around it.
So what im seeing from this is that Xbox will keep releasing CoD until Playstation 5 life cycle ends.
If Sony had bought Square before the Embracer deal they would have the exclusivity deal on:
I really dont care much over the situation but i have to admit that Microsoft made the best move.
- Final Fantasy
- Dragon Quest
- Hitman
- Tomb Raider
- Marvel Avengers
- Just Cause
- Deus Ex
- Kingdom Hearts
- Parasite Eve
- Nier
This is why they in court legal obligation to not remove or alter content on other platforms if the deal goes through.Phil Spencer did not specify in what way COD would remain multiplat. For example, they could in fact remove the annual releases, but keep Warzone multiplat. That would be analogous to them making TES VI Xbox console exclusive, but keeping ESO multiplatform.
So Phil's answer to that question means effectively nothing.
I am a lawyer (UK, though).
When you act as a witness and give evidence under oath, you are obviously required to tell the truth. If it can be demonstrated that you knowingly lied about points of material fact, you can face criminal charges.
But he’s making statements about MS future strategy that can only reasonably be levied against the company itself.
The logical conclusion of a single executive being responsible is that the moment they leave the company, that company is no longer required to honour those statements. It would make an absolute mockery of the whole judicial process.
I’m not saying that a company might not be stupid enough to try that. They could go exclusive and then claim Phil was a simpleton who didn’t know what he was talking about but, and I can’t stress this point enough, they would get torn to absolute fucking pieces.
CoD is not going exclusive.
yeah , i guess he missed this partWhy are you creating a situation that literally never happened?
Half of this list was already sold off by Square themselves.
No way...![]()
He delivered a prepared statement (likely agonised over by MS lawyers for days).
He gave the economic argument for CoD remaining multi platform, but more importantly, called out the anger Sony gamers would have if it was made exclusive. Detrimental harm to the video game market. You just don’t say something like that unless you’re prepared to honour it.
A regulator can absolutely hold them to that standard. As I say, if you tried to reverse on that in the EU or UK, you would be hauled over coals within days.
I appreciate the US might be different. If witnesses are allowed to knowingly mislead regulators then it’s a pretty wild jurisdiction.
Why are you creating a situation that literally never happened?
Half of this list was already sold off by Square themselves.
yeah , i guess he missed this part
Hitman left with IOInteractive. They own the IP. IOInteractive left well before SE sold off the western devs to Embracer. Just saying.
No way...![]()
"Just a news aggregate" "Trust us, bros!"I'm not sure why he thinks Sony or exclusivity in general is on trial here. Cause they aren't.
Ultimately its the scale of this that is on trial. But today's trial is really just to determine if status quo should be maintained until the regulatory trial actually occurs.
Lulu??I prefer to suffer through this smooth ass....
![]()
No way...![]()
Straight pimping. The only thing that's would make that gif better, would be Phil, Aaron, and Matt's faces on the hoes.Notch all like,
![]()