Topher
Identifies as young
Nothing has to be "illegal" to stop a consolidation that will impact an industry.
Where you at, BTW?

Nothing has to be "illegal" to stop a consolidation that will impact an industry.
Where you at, BTW?
Interesting... Has any other country blocked it so far? If CMA really is the only regulatory body that comes to this conclusion I mean that seems like pretty strong evidence that they acted irrationally. If everything else falls in line the CMA's initial "final" decision may not be the nail in the coffin after all? Maaaan I don't want this to keep dragging out fjrieudbfheiehdbInteresting article on judicial reviews of CMA.
This is key:
"CMA decisions will be reviewed under strict principles of irrationality under the Wednesbury unreasonableness test, i.e., was the decision so irrational that no reasonable competition authority could have reached the same decision? "
[/URL][/URL]
what is stopping xbox from putting their games there now?
also, but I was talking about activision... I mean...kotick, meservey, thanks to this whole story, all activision managers haven't publicly faced (who knows how many) lawsuits for power and sexual abuse, there was even a suicide among the employees in abk... how can you accuse government bodies knowing what a mess you avoidedAs always, MS/Xbox blaming everyone else except themselves
Interesting... Has any other country blocked it so far? If CMA really is the only regulatory body that comes to this conclusion I mean that seems like pretty strong evidence that they acted irrationally. If everything else falls in line the CMA's initial "final" decision may not be the nail in the coffin after all? Maaaan I don't want this to keep dragging out fjrieudbfheiehdb
Nothing about the CMA's decision is "irrational" except in the eyes of fanboys who don't live in reality. It's clear the FTC has issues with it, otherwise they wouldn't be going to court. The EU doesn't seem terribly enthused by the prospect either.Interesting... Has any other country blocked it so far? If CMA really is the only regulatory body that comes to this conclusion I mean that seems like pretty strong evidence that they acted irrationally. If everything else falls in line the CMA's initial "final" decision may not be the nail in the coffin after all? Maaaan I don't want this to keep dragging out fjrieudbfheiehdb
No other country has done anywhere near the level of due diligence on this deal as the CMA has, in large part because it doesn't affect any of them outside of like, Japan maybe? The biggest markets this deal effects are US/UK/EU. US has already sued to block the deal, so yes - in effect another country has moved to block it besides the UK/CMA. As for the EU, they've already gotten huge concessions and their final verdict hasn't even been given - the CMA's findings will weigh heavily on that btw, as they also had major concerns about Cloud in their findings. Heck, the CMA may have handed the FTC all the legal basis it needs in this final report to get the deal shut down in the FTC's admin. court in August.Interesting... Has any other country blocked it so far? If CMA really is the only regulatory body that comes to this conclusion I mean that seems like pretty strong evidence that they acted irrationally. If everything else falls in line the CMA's initial "final" decision may not be the nail in the coffin after all? Maaaan I don't want this to keep dragging out fjrieudbfheiehdb
"I was surprised to learn that Lina Khan and the head of the CMA had a meeting a week and a half ago in Washington. You know, legally, you're not supposed to be discussing active litigation. I don't know that they did," Kotick said in the interview.
"I think that that's what you're seeing now is that the CMA is being used as a tool by the FTC to be able to create these kinds of outcomes, and it this isn't the way that they're supposed to be operating."
![]()
this guy is something else, no wonder jimbo ignored his calls
Meh. This is from the CMA's guidance document on merger processes...
"18. Multi-jurisdictional mergers
18.1 Some mergers qualify for merger control review in more than one jurisdiction
(these mergers are referred to as 'multi-jurisdictional' mergers for the
purposes of this guidance). For multi-jurisdictional mergers, there can be
substantial benefits (to merging parties and competition authorities, and
therefore, in turn, to consumers) from communication and cooperation
between the competition authorities that have jurisdiction to investigate the
merger.
18.2 In practice, communication and cooperation between competition authorities
in such circumstances typically relates to both the substantive assessment of
the merger (eg through the sharing of evidence and analysis), as well as any
remedies that might be put in place to address competition concerns (eg to
ensure that potential remedies in different jurisdictions are consistent, or at
least mutually compatible, while meeting the applicable statutory
requirements).
18.3 In carrying out its merger investigations, the CMA frequently cooperates with
other competition authorities. More broadly, the CMA actively seeks to
promote best practice in merger control through networks such as the
International Competition Network (ICN) and the Competition Committee of
the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)"
There's no impropriety here. It's difficult to understand how these execs are so misinformed about the legal processes they chose to subject themselves to.
It's also difficult to understand why some people are so easily duped by this misinformation and rabble rousing.
Is the dude on Microsoft's payroll? Lord I've not even seen Timdog reach this far beforeReposting from the other thread.
![]()
Some people need to turn off the computer and take a walk right now.
That sounded like a hypothetical to me. I don't think the requirement is for another regulatory body to come to the same exact decision or else this one is irrational. This is a question that the CAT must answer based on findings provided by the CMA.
It's also worth pointing out yet again, that even if they do prove the CMA acted irrationally, all that's going to happen is it goes back to the CMA for review.There is literally 0 evidence that they acted irrationally, and your use of that word is clearly because you feel the CAT will grant the appeal if enough folks deem it so, but understand this - if the CAT grants the appeal, it gets sent right back to the CMA to re-review, who MS and ATVI has now spent over 24h+ talking shit about with nonsensical claims, and Kotick even publicly accused the CMA of conspiring with the FTC. If you think any of this will help MS in their potential re-review down the line with the CMA, you're sorely mistaken.
What ever do you mean? Are they preoccupied with other things? What could possibly be more urgent than Microsoft buying Activision?No disrespect intended for Ukraine but I don't believe their approval means much here.
Is the dude on Microsoft's payroll? Lord I've not even seen Timdog reach this far before![]()
The CMA cannot be overruled. It's not legally possible. It's sad to see people failing to understand how the system works.Is the dude on Microsoft's payroll? Lord I've not even seen Timdog reach this far before![]()
And given the way Microsoft top brass are trivially damaging Microsoft's reputation with their comments about the UK, the CMA might be more inclined to add the Console SLC back in as it evidences that losing $1b a year to foreclose PlayStation with CoD exclusivity on Xbox isn't beyond their actions when losing face appears to have major currency in Microsoft, and they've been losing to PlayStation for decades, so a few billion and few years of exclusivity for CoD to fix that might seem cheap.No other country has done anywhere near the level of due diligence on this deal as the CMA has, in large part because it doesn't affect any of them outside of like, Japan maybe? The biggest markets this deal effects are US/UK/EU. US has already sued to block the deal, so yes - in effect another country has moved to block it besides the UK/CMA. As for the EU, they've already gotten huge concessions and their final verdict hasn't even been given - the CMA's findings will weigh heavily on that btw, as they also had major concerns about Cloud in their findings. Heck, the CMA may have handed the FTC all the legal basis it needs in this final report to get the deal shut down in the FTC's admin. court in August.
There is literally 0 evidence that they acted irrationally, and your use of that word is clearly because you feel the CAT will grant the appeal if enough folks deem it so, but understand this - if the CAT grants the appeal, it gets sent right back to the CMA to re-review, who MS and ATVI has now spent over 24h+ talking shit about with nonsensical claims, and Kotick even publicly accused the CMA of conspiring with the FTC. If you think any of this will help MS in their potential re-review down the line with the CMA, you're sorely mistaken.
"Basically, this is Microsoft and Brad Smith throwing their toys out of the pram after they didn't get the decision they wanted after all the lobbying they did," said Max von Thun, director of the Europe office of the Open Markets Institute, a proponent of stronger antitrust enforcement.
"They're struggling to maintain that 'good guy' reputation," von Thun said.
big oof
![]()
Microsoft's 'good guy' approach frays in UK gaming battle
Microsoft’s charm offensive with the world’s governments is starting to lose some of its luster as the software giant is confronting its toughest antitrust scrutiny since co-founder Bill Gates was in charge. A blow came this week when British regulators said they would block Microsoft’s planned...apnews.com
Did you guys post this? The cry is hilarious.
Turned out the smart guy is not so smart. CMA broke down his badass image is completly.
I have to say, is probably the darkest day in our four decades in Britain," the company's president, Brad Smith, told BBC Radio 4. "It does more than shake our confidence in the future of the opportunity to grow a technology business in Britain than we've ever confronted before."
"Basically, this is Microsoft and Brad Smith throwing their toys out of the pram after they didn't get the decision they wanted after all the lobbying they did," said Max von Thun, director of the Europe office of the Open Markets Institute, a proponent of stronger antitrust enforcement.
Becuase surely he lost a big bunus..dude is literally choking and about to cry
![]()
And people slammed me, when I said this deal benefits MS.Fucking knew that all those "amazing, pro-consumer" deals had numerous catches in them!
desperation after the financial results released by microsoft two days ago is absurd, even more absurd that he threatens an entire sovereign nation and its bodies
Did you guys post this? The cry is hilarious.
Turned out the smart guy is not so smart. CMA broke down his badass image is completly.
This situation is turning ugly
All of that PR and it turns out those deals shed light on how MS would operate once they had an even larger advantage in streaming.Fucking knew that all those "amazing, pro-consumer" deals had numerous catches in them!
In their fucking DNA.Fucking knew that all those "amazing, pro-consumer" deals had numerous catches in them!
You have to really check on "journalists" these days. Jez Corden........
"Update: In response, a spokesperson for the UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said that Smith's remarks regarding the UK's viability as a tech business hub were "wrong," and "not borne of the facts." The spokesperson also said that the UK government would engage Microsoft on the issue while reiterating that the CMA is an unelected, independent body separate from the government. "
The PM spokesperson did not say they would engage with Microsoft on the ABK issue. This is what they said:
"We continue to believe that the UK has an extremely attractive tech sector and a growing games market," he said. "We will continue to engage proactively with Microsoft and other companies."
This situation is turning ugly