Zombie James
Banned
The font rendering situation pisses me off to no end. DirectWrite is garbage, my eyes hurt trying to read this fuzzy mess.
I wanna know too, apparently we can't thoughIf we install this, does anyone know if we can upgrade from the tech preview to the full version rather than doing a full reinstall?
I wanna know too, apparently we can't though
Beware of anonymous bullshit on the internet.
For starters, humoring the fact that they even are an MS employee, they even say that is a rumor. They clearly aren't someone in the know so don't treat this like it's true (aka, they don't work on Windows).
Second, that's not even how you check for the version on Windows. When you ask for the version number, you will get the kernel number you are on, for example Windows 10 will return "6.4". Early on in the process, the engineers don't know what the product will be called, which is why you don't bother working with the product name at all. That's why everyone uses the kernel version number, because that won't change even if the product name does.
The only way you can even get the friendly product name as far as I know is to use WMI, which didn't even come installed on Windows machines until Windows 2000. MS did offer WMI for Win95 and Win98, but it was an optional download the user had to install for it to work.
You could obviously work around the problem without WMI by implementing your own logic for "if they are on this major version, and this minor version then I'll assume it's Windows 95", but obviously you can see that uses the version number anyway, and thus isn't an issue.
Finally, even if this were true, and a developer went completely against all of the guidance MS has ever released and supported for how to check the version number, that's why MS has compatibility shims. Considering that to do this sort of check requires an optional download, the amount of software that would even theoretically do this would be tiny, and thus they could add it to a compatibility list and it would be fine. It's silly to think that it's a technical reason they couldn't name it Windows 9. It was clearly a marketing decision.
I call complete bullshit on that rumor.
Screens?The font rendering situation pisses me off to no end. DirectWrite is garbage, my eyes hurt trying to read this fuzzy mess.
I initially thought it was a joke as well. But then you see things like this...
https://searchcode.com/?q=if(version,startswith("windows+9")
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2i14ny/if_osnamestartswithwindows_9/
I don't think this is a serious reason
If we install this, does anyone know if we can upgrade from the tech preview to the full version rather than doing a full reinstall?
ugh. my CD drive keeps failing and can't install it.
USB sticks are the way to go, even if your CD drive was working.
The font rendering situation pisses me off to no end. DirectWrite is garbage, my eyes hurt trying to read this fuzzy mess.
Use this. Worked for nejust tried it. it restarted and said it failed. lol. it's not meant to be. unless i'm not setting up the usb drive correctly.
Use this. Worked for ne
http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msusa/html/pbPage.Help_Win7_usbdvd_dwnTool
Looks fine to me. I tried the MacType font thing but I didn't like how it looked. Maybe I should try it again.
k. got Windows 10 installed. charm bar doesn't pop up on my laptop?
also. i should try to use the start menu but man, it's so cluttered. let me work on fixing that. if i don't like i'm just going back to the start screen.
but i do like the new animation when you open a window though.
MacType is a great tool, and for me an improvement on the Windows 8 defaults (and Windows' rigid pixel hinting in general). That said it took me a few hours to customize it to something usable, coming from OSX, as the included presets just don't cut it imo. In XP I didn't use ClearType.
You know. not that I believe that's the reason why Microsoft calls the OS Windows 10, but the Opera web browser actually had to deal with the problem of programmers comparing version numbers poorly.
When Opera first went to version 10, the alpha version had "Opera 10.00" in the user agent string, but some web sites thought it was Opera 1. As a result, the user agent string in Opera 10 on a Mac is:
Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.00
There is no outerglow on the titlebar in 10. I don't know what happened in that screenshot.I can see that whoever is in charge of designing the font for the window titlebars is still a complete imbecile.
Outerglow in 2014. Fucking disgusting.
I can see that whoever is in charge of designing the font for the window titlebars is still a complete imbecile.
Outerglow in 2014. Fucking disgusting.
There is no outerglow on the titlebar in 10. I don't know what happened in that screenshot.
It's not in 8 either.That's Windows 8.
I can see that whoever is in charge of designing the font for the window titlebars is still a complete imbecile.
Outerglow in 2014. Fucking disgusting.
i should restart after updating the graphics driver but.
There is no sane reason to use a screensaver anymore. Just set it to turn off the screen as is the default and has been for nearly a decade.Is the Screen Saver menu still that gutted legacy properties box with the disgusting Windows XP CRT "preview"?
I can see that whoever is in charge of designing the font for the window titlebars is still a complete imbecile.
Outerglow in 2014. Fucking disgusting.
It shows on some colors for me in 8/8.1. Haven't got around to trying in Win10 yet.It's not in 8 either.
Is the Screen Saver menu still that gutted legacy properties box with the disgusting Windows XP CRT "preview"?
Huh. Never seen that before then. My bad.It shows on some colors and not others for me in 8/8.1. Haven't got around to trying in Win10 yet.
Now that you mention it, the charm bar doesn't work on my machine either. Do I have to turn it on or something?
Huh. Never seen that before then. My bad.
Well yeah but still.There is no sane reason to use a screensaver anymore. Just set it to turn off the screen as is the default and has been for nearly a decade.
With mousekeyboard? It isn't there anymore (though maybe Win+C could work?). They said in the keynote that it will be touch only, and even then, they said those will change by release.
Open
I am basing this entirely on their design paradigms and what they've shown in the video. I haven't gone through some of the technical details yet, but I am thinking purely in terms of UI and design: They grafted the Metro onto the Desktop with 8, now they're renegotiating the relationship between Modern/Classic elements.... at this point they should be rethinking how desktop and modern elments look and work entirely, and design something that feels unified. It really just looks like another Frankenstein design grafted on top of 7.
If they have done work under the hood, that's appreciated, but everything on the surface looks half baked. More compromises between the legacies of 7 and 8... no original design thinking that unifies the two or does its own thing.
I think they've dug themself into a hole with Win 8 - now the market is forcing them back to Win 7 paradigms - so it's a design based on compromise after compromise between the two. This isn't a confidant new vision - it's an iterative retreat.
Win+c works, but pushing to the edge of the screen does nothing. I liked that, I also like the start screen over this menu crap.
I have found one annoying thing, but it's likely more google's fault. My hangouts tabs make a odd box when they hide themselves, they didn't do that on 8.1.
Closed.
Open
Sorry if I missed this but...
Is Windows 10 going to be free upgrade for Windows 8/8.1 users?