Microsoft should've made the Oblivion Remaster an Xbox-only exclusive.

Nintendo players will buy even cardboard at high price.

OggQtZk.gif
 
Remasters of old games are never going to drive system purchases that matter vs the loss of not porting to other platforms.


Also, exclusives provide no consumer benefit, and AAA production values are budgeting themselves out of exclusivity being viable. Even Nintendo's smaller costs inevitably fall to emulation, and the other 2 are already voluntarily porting.
 
At least for a year or so. It doesn't have mod support anyway, and people would've bought the consoles in droves. Imo it's a lost opportunity for them.

EDIT: I see the memelicious responses coming in from fellow GAFers, but come on you can't deny it was an easy strategic move to grab a chunk of the console market.
You'd grab only the most hardcore people still playing oblivion every few days, that's what? A few thousand at most?


It averages about a thousand daily players which is still kinda cool for an 18 year old game but the idea they'd suddenly convert "millions" is pretty out there.
 
I agree unironically. I like exclusives. It gives a given platform a unique identity instead of making every platform a generic box.

I don't particularly care about people being excluded. I don't like most people anyway.
 
Nintendo players will buy even cardboard at high price. Microsoft players only want "free" games on GP
Cardboard has real life ray tracing, makes real sound and has real feel to touch , so:

Cardboard >>>>>>> Graphics, Level design, sound, gameplay and haptics.

Nintendo wins!
 
At least for a year or so. It doesn't have mod support anyway, and people would've bought the consoles in droves. Imo it's a lost opportunity for them.

EDIT: I see the memelicious responses coming in from fellow GAFers, but come on you can't deny it was an easy strategic move to grab a chunk of the console market.
Nyop7iN.gif


xbox is dead man, deal with it.
 
At least for a year or so. It doesn't have mod support anyway, and people would've bought the consoles in droves. Imo it's a lost opportunity for them.

EDIT: I see the memelicious responses coming in from fellow GAFers, but come on you can't deny it was an easy strategic move to grab a chunk of the console market.

If they put this on Switch 2, I'm going to set fire on my OneX I swear.
 
Xbox as a hardware platform is dead. That this was not even timed on Xbox should ve proof enough that they dont care

Xbox as a publisher is very much alive though and they release great games

Great for everyone, except if you care for XB hardware i guess
 
Last edited:
I am personally happy that all the bethesda games are going back to competitors. Its the swing from purchasing activision, phil thought he was rescuing xbox but in the end it killed it. Gamepass is still the best value in gaming.
 
Which consumers lost?

Playstation and Nintendo gained games and for PC everything remains the same. PC even has cheaper GamePass afaik.
Tom Cruise What GIF


Which consumer lost anything? Everybody gained imho.
Playstation are steadily increasing prices and anti-consumer practices. As are Nintendo. That's a loss for consumers in my book. Microsoft blowing up their business with Xbox One and then going all in on their "Let's be the Netflix of gaming" bullshit is also a loss for consumers because I think that subscription-based models are inherently anti-consumer. And on the PC side of things, Nvidia are fucking up the hardware market as well.
 
I think its good that its every where. LEt everyone who wants to play it, play it. And its a lot more money to the studio to allow them to do more stuff like this.

Great release.
 
Xbox are in the money making business and don't care about console exclusives anymore. They know better than most that dropping games on as many platforms as possible will generate maximum revenue.
 
No one is buying games on Xbox and they have hit the ceiling with Game Pass subscribers. No one is buying an Xbox to play their exclusives.

That's why they are releasing games on platforms like Steam and PS, because they are getting a lot of sales and making a lot of money.

Pretty straight forward.
 
Playstation are steadily increasing prices and anti-consumer practices. As are Nintendo. That's a loss for consumers in my book.
That's economy for ya.

Pretty much everything in society is seeing price increases.
Microsoft blowing up their business with Xbox One and then going all in on their "Let's be the Netflix of gaming" bullshit is also a loss for consumers because I think that subscription-based models are inherently anti-consumer. And on the PC side of things, Nvidia are fucking up the hardware market as well.
GamePass is dead-end, so hardly a loss for consumers.

As for Nvidia, that is a different matter than the console-wars.
 
Playstation are steadily increasing prices and anti-consumer practices. As are Nintendo. That's a loss for consumers in my book. Microsoft blowing up their business with Xbox One and then going all in on their "Let's be the Netflix of gaming" bullshit is also a loss for consumers because I think that subscription-based models are inherently anti-consumer. And on the PC side of things, Nvidia are fucking up the hardware market as well.
But you dont know if the same scenario wouldnt have happen anyway if xbox would be still in the "exclusive" race. You just pretending it wouldnt. And that big corpos acting as anti-consumer as possible is nothing new. Its also up to the consumers here to take a stand. I hate gamepass as a model with a passion, same as you....so I just dont interact with it at all. If consumers fall for it....its only their fault.
 
I think many of us forgot already how it all happened in sept 2020 when MS bough Bethesda for 7,5m usd :D


In hindsight they were spending 7,5b usd only to give all those bethesda games to pc and playstation anyways, its like getting exclusive with a girl, paying all her bills, take her on expensive vacations, hell even support her poor family every now and then when she asks for it and still agree she can fuck other dudes anytime she wants, basically a full on cuck experience :messenger_grinning_squinting:
Does xbox sound anything but that when we have phil recently stating stuff like this:
Or this statement from few months ago about xbox games on playstation platform:


When ur CEO is a cuck u can forget about exclusives (yes, we know they prefer making money in the end, still, fuck that shit, i would feel betrayed af as an xbox series console owner, if xbox console owners knew ps5 owners will get access to microsoft games most of them would simply go with playstation5 instead) :P

a4PnKBp_460s.jpg
 
Microsoft definitely didn't do that out of the kindness of their hearts. It was almost certainly part of a deal with the regulatory authorities. Plus, they've got to recover those burned billions somehow.
 
Coopetition game theory in economics. It can sometimes make sense for a company to remain an exclusive supplier to itself, if that can generate immense value and create a monopoly, but lacking those conditions a large company with multiple divisions is better served by acting as if one division is unrelated to another division. That means Microsoft putting Word on OSX instead of making it exclusive to Windows, Sony selling its TV panels and camera sensors to competitors, etc. More money to be made.

In Microsoft's case, they have a platform on life support and somewhere on the order of $100 billion invested in game studios. It makes very little sense at this point to keep their releases exclusive to Xbox.

Microsoft's plan was actually to buy all those studios and then have them create Xbox exclusive games for Gamepass. The issue was that Xbox management expected Gamepass subscriptions (and Xbox sales) to go through the roof which would make up for the loss of software sales on Playstation and the costs of having tens of thousands new, expensive game devs on their payroll-- but that never happened. So now MS owned many more (expensive) game studios than just a few years before but they were selling less software and Gamepass revenues hit a plateau. That's when MS management stepped in and forced huge changes.

jjoCHpA.png
 
They can't afford it though.
This. That thing has sailed when Phil decided to saddle Microsoft with over 70 BILLION acquisition fee for Bethesda + ABK. SIngle console ecosystem cannot sustain this sort of capital expenditure. I don't know if Phil knew this all along or not, doesn't matter now.
 
The Oblivion Remaster would not have sold loads of Xbox's just on it's own, maybe a new Elder Scroll, but not a remaster, yes it's popular because it's a very well known game that has been remastered to a high degree and it's on game pass so anyone can just download and play the game without paying any extra,, as for the mod comment's, it's actually selling on Steam in good numbers not Xbox so cutting PC out makes no sense either and there are mods and will be more in the future,

The OP's tactic to sell more Xbox's wouldn't have worked with the Oblivion Remaster.
 
Last edited:
Microsoft's plan was actually to buy all those studios and then have them create Xbox exclusive games for Gamepass. The issue was that Xbox management expected Gamepass subscriptions (and Xbox sales) to go through the roof which would make up for the loss of software sales on Playstation and the costs of having tens of thousands new, expensive game devs on their payroll-- but that never happened. So now MS owned many more (expensive) game studios than just a few years before but they were selling less software and Gamepass revenues hit a plateau. That's when MS management stepped in and forced huge changes.
Basically this. It was a pure startup / VC play "go fast, go big, figure the profit part later" that was hilariously approved by one of the most conservative corporations out there (yes, Microsoft is conservative selling billions of equipment and software to big, old companies worldwide).
 
At least for a year or so. It doesn't have mod support anyway, and people would've bought the consoles in droves. Imo it's a lost opportunity for them.

EDIT: I see the memelicious responses coming in from fellow GAFers, but come on you can't deny it was an easy strategic move to grab a chunk of the console market.
Take your lost, people disagree with you, it was not a smart remark, move on....
 
Why in 2025, take a famously multiplatform game, which sells big numbers on all platforms, and limit it to just 2.

Is there any actual answer besides console wars?
 
This. That thing has sailed when Phil decided to saddle Microsoft with over 70 BILLION acquisition fee for Bethesda + ABK. SIngle console ecosystem cannot sustain this sort of capital expenditure. I don't know if Phil knew this all along or not, doesn't matter now.
I'd say the ship sailed even earlier, when Phil thought he could make MS the Netflix of gaming. That's the turning point for me, that brought Forza Horizon 5 in my PS wishlist.
 
OP, are you a bigot?
What you are proposing doesn't sound very inclusive, and I don't think modern audiences will like it.
 
They are dead on Playstation as well 😱
No they are not, people are still buying PlayStation games. The issue is the Xbox brand it is just too dead, there is nothing they can do to revive it at this point. Regardless of what Xbox is going to drop it is always going to be over shadowed by whatever Sony is going to drop and Microsoft realized (albeit a bit too late) but they did.
 
At least for a year or so. It doesn't have mod support anyway, and people would've bought the consoles in droves. Imo it's a lost opportunity for them.
So you don't want that someone play it for a year? Makes sense, because 2026 is the 25 anniversary.
Because the exclusive XSX games were such a success, like Starfield and were are the pr news for Indiania Jones, as it was a XSX exclusive?
 
They are not releasing games multiplatform out of the goodness of their heart,they do it because they have no choice
 
They are not releasing games multiplatform out of the goodness of their heart,they do it because they have no choice
What as a fellow gaffer should u tell to ur xbox series gaf bros, who back 4-5years ago wondered which next gen console to pick tho? Would u tell all of them back in 2020 to 100% go for ps5 since its gonna play xbox games anwyays, and xbox series will have 0 exclusives tru its whole lifespan?
We know its good deal for microsoft, at least short term, but we arent microsoft, we are console owners, in this case xbox series console owners, dont u think they getting short end of the stick by trusting MS/Xbox this gen instead of going with sony's platform?
 
Last edited:
At least for a year or so. It doesn't have mod support anyway, and people would've bought the consoles in droves. Imo it's a lost opportunity for them.

EDIT: I see the memelicious responses coming in from fellow GAFers, but come on you can't deny it was an easy strategic move to grab a chunk of the console market.
Microsoft ain't in it to grab a chunk of console market anymore. It's a pointless battle . They wil make more money offering games on other platforms and they know this
 
Top Bottom