Miles Quaritch
Member
900p
Not that I doubt you, but how can you tell?
What are the tell tale signs?
900p
My fellow brazilians friends.
Game is up on PSN BR: R$122, almost U$50.
https://store.sonyentertainmentnetw...ição/cid=UP1018-CUSA00725_00-SHADOWOFMORDOR01
Fuck this, I'm going home. I can hear the call of Sauron.
I dont agree. batman has tons of stuff to do as sidequests that is not beating up bad guys.
sure, combat is still the main thing, but in mordor its the only thing.
dark souls offers huge, detailed and diverse enviroments. mordor offers a boring wasteland.
dark souls has tons of different weapons with different animations, strenghts and weaknesses. it has different kinds of magic. mordor has three set main weapons, which can be improved/changed slightly with runes.
dark souls has tons of different kinds of enemies with completely own design, attack patterns and require different strategies. and huge, spectacular bosses.
This is a weird defense. When is "going anywhere" really that conducive to building a good world? Dark Souls world was incredibly intricate and fascinating to explore because it was built with a purpose. Most games with large open worlds are lack things to do in many corners of the world. It's neat to have a big world but when there's really nothing unique or interesting to do within most of it the impact is lost.Yeap.. It does offer a lot of variety.. but it's still an on-rails RPG. You can't go ANYWHERE.
That's kind of a bold statement.Yes, and none of them are going to be as fun as the Nemesis system.
He made valid points.
So what else do you do in this game besides kill Orcs?
The controls are seriously unresponsive on the PS4 version, it really pisses me off, don't understand how today's games still have this problem
i'm all for an option to disable if that means better, responsive controls and a tiny bit better framerate
If the game is too easy and there is no difficulty selection, the Nemesis system kind of falls apart, doesn't it?
This game has the enemy not only talking smack but actually mentioning past engagements and reminding me that I lost. I can feel my blood boiling already lol
Same here; last night I watched the french guy on Twitch (apparently the only man with the X1 version on the planet), and the game looked good and ran fine... of course, there is the streaming compression or limitations factors.
I just cant believe that hours before launch we still have NOTHING OFFICIAL or people playing it that can, at least, give some insights for those waiting to make a decision. I have a PS4 as well, but I honestly prefer to use the X1 controller and most of my friends are on XBL
A bit dissapointed with Monolith and WB for the lack of info.
Yes, and none of them are going to be as fun as the Nemesis system. On top of that, you still have to grind to advance in the game or move forward in the plot. Dying respawned the same enemies in the same locations.
Bosses were awesome in DS2.. but for the most part couldn't be beat solo. Teaming up made the boss fights a pushover. Which defeated the purpose of being strong enough to beat them. And all of them had attack patterns that, given enough defeats, could be beaten.
-M
Has anyone on PS4 managed to get the preorder bonuses to work? The Dark Ranger skin, namely.
FIX THIS SHIT, MONOLITH.
If you consider solving Riddler puzzles as something to do in Batman, or seeing how long you can fly through hoops in Gotham, then sure. It does have more to do. But that's not the selling point in the game.. nor is it even done by most people who play the game.
Yeap.. It does offer a lot of variety.. but it's still an on-rails RPG. You can't go ANYWHERE.
And of all the tons of weapons with different animations, most people select their role and play with that. Which narrows down the animations to a small handful. No decaps, no brutal kills either. I'd rather have main weapons and then just level them up (which is what DS does too.)
Yes, and none of them are going to be as fun as the Nemesis system. On top of that, you still have to grind to advance in the game or move forward in the plot. Dying respawned the same enemies in the same locations.
Bosses were awesome in DS2.. but for the most part couldn't be beat solo. Teaming up made the boss fights a pushover. Which defeated the purpose of being strong enough to beat them. And all of them had attack patterns that, given enough defeats, could be beaten.
-M
Dark Souls is on on-rails RPG... okay. Wow.
That's not true. I only complain about unstable frame-rates. If I can't have a stable 60 fps, I'll take a stable 30 fps instead. Fluctuating frame-rates are what I find unplayable. 30 fps with motion-blur isn't optimal, but I don't mind it too much these days. 60 fps just doesn't look the same on non-CRT displays...
Have you ever played anything on the NES, the SNES, Genesis or other systems from that era? 95% of those games were 60 fps.
Not that I doubt you, but how can you tell?
What are the tell tale signs?
Yes it is very linear...
Killing a specific number of certain bosses in any order isn't what I call open-world.
If you consider solving Riddler puzzles as something to do in Batman, or seeing how long you can fly through hoops in Gotham, then sure. It does have more to do. But that's not the selling point in the game.. nor is it even done by most people who play the game.
Yeap.. It does offer a lot of variety.. but it's still an on-rails RPG. You can't go ANYWHERE.
And of all the tons of weapons with different animations, most people select their role and play with that. Which narrows down the animations to a small handful. No decaps, no brutal kills either. I'd rather have main weapons and then just level them up (which is what DS does too.)
Yes, and none of them are going to be as fun as the Nemesis system. On top of that, you still have to grind to advance in the game or move forward in the plot. Dying respawned the same enemies in the same locations.
Bosses were awesome in DS2.. but for the most part couldn't be beat solo. Teaming up made the boss fights a pushover. Which defeated the purpose of being strong enough to beat them. And all of them had attack patterns that, given enough defeats, could be beaten.
-M
Can Shadow of Mordor only be good if Dark Souls is bad? And if Dark Souls is good, therefore Shadow of Mordor is bad? I'm confused.
This game looks so damn good. This feels like next gen.
What are you even talking about?
You don't have to grind shit in DkS, you can beat the game on level 1.
And you can most definitely beat ALL of the bosses (included the DLC ones) solo.
This game looks so damn good. This feels like next gen.
That is literally the opposite of the definition of linear.
But unfortunately does not look the part. I was expecting better in the graphics department.
Not that I doubt you, but how can you tell?
What are the tell tale signs?
Whaaaat? I'm blown away by the graphics. And I'm playing on PS4. And I just finished playing through the Vanishing of Ethan Carter on my PC, so I'm sort of using that as a benchmark.
Maybe I'm easily impressed.
Is the problem that the game is too easy or that GAF, and more specifically communities that play games like Dark Souls and Batman before, are better at these games than a general community and maybe some reviewers? Because plenty of the reviews seemed to be talking about difficulty and having to kill a guy after hours of trying. A guy earlier complained that the game was too easy then humble bragged that he aced batman challenge maps lol.
I'm willing to give a chance to the game besides the opening hours. Lord knows I was disappointed by games like Darksiders in the opening hours but that it got much better with more hours. Not saying anybody here is jumping to conclusions though.
All I know is that it's a licensed game, which already have a harder time at getting good reviews (from what I've seen), so if the consensus is that it's a mid 80 game then I'm willing to bet that as a whole it'll be a very satisfying game.
Gotta wait till I get home from work to play haha.
Some have higher standards here. That's not condescending btw as I'm part of the "easily impressed" bunch. I didn't even notice the fps on second son while playing because I was too busy having nerdgasms over the graphics.Whaaaat? I'm blown away by the graphics. And I'm playing on PS4. And I just finished playing through the Vanishing of Ethan Carter on my PC, so I'm sort of using that as a benchmark.
Maybe I'm easily impressed.