-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Minecraft |OT2| Punch Your Way to Your Own World
- Thread starter Brazil
- Start date
NihonTiger90
Member
Found a big cave. Explored it. Fell into a lava pit that was right below me and lost everything. Weeped bitterly.
The only upside was what I lost is completely replaceable.
The only upside was what I lost is completely replaceable.
Lazlo Woodbine
Member
Treefingers
Member
They're purely cosmetic and have been given to a small number of people. There were also Christmas and New Year's cloaks that everyone wore during Christmas and New Year's Eve.Kuran said:
http://www.minecraftwiki.net/wiki/Skin#Cloaks
Rabbit Lord
Member
Then don't fly, we have the option to let people play the way they want to play. Don't force me to play the way you want me to play. Is there a way to apply some sort of limits to flying, such as we don't want new people logging on and exploring 300mb of map. Make it rank based? I don't know if thats possible.
Also to others, stop telling me to go play creative. I like gathering mats, I also like building. Don't tell me what the point of Neocraft is, last I checked flying is turned on and has been for a while, many many blocks have been spawned and used by a great number of people and we have a number of mods in use. How about you play vanilla survival.
The tweets were about being able to change cloaks in your profile on Minecraft.net, and that C418 recommending allowing people to wear two as a joke, and notch saying he was onto something. I assume that is what was deleted, off the top of my head.
Edit: The tweet about people getting cloaks at Minecon, I dont think that was the secret?
"It's highly likely people who go to Minecon will get a unique cloak in Minecraft. #cloakbasedminigsimulation"
Edit: The tweet about people getting cloaks at Minecon, I dont think that was the secret?
"It's highly likely people who go to Minecon will get a unique cloak in Minecraft. #cloakbasedminigsimulation"
Rabbit Lord said:
Well, it's not that others are telling you how to play anyways, Neocraft always been without flying and Ark warned that it would be temporary. You should totally expect to not be able to fly soon. If ever it's not removed, fine. If ever it is removed, try to make yourself some fun instead of trying to swim against the river flow. THERE IS a fun to have in planning how to build something without dying because you don't fly believe me. You're not immune to that fun...
Togglesworlh
Banned
It's infinitely more interesting when everyone on a server plays by the same rules and no one cheats.Rabbit Lord said:
Check out the ego on the guy who made FortressCraft:
FortressCraft Creator Talks Minecraft Comparisons
Rabbit Lord
Member
Seems like a dick. Is his game any good?
Rabbit Lord
Member
Ranger X said:
Yea, was just looking at some YT vids, doesn't look so good.
AutoGibbon
Neo Member
You mean rip-offs like this one? These things are just bad, it doesn't exactly look very playable, now does it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFi1gtKgurw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFi1gtKgurw
notch just tweeted that villagers are coming in 1.9, but they won't do much and will only spawn in new villages. so reset again so soon?? why can't the game just store where villages are?
as for flying, you could perhaps allow it but only for height/building. anyone found using it to fly long distances and bloating the map get it removed.
as for flying, you could perhaps allow it but only for height/building. anyone found using it to fly long distances and bloating the map get it removed.
British Monsoon
Member
See, this is exactly why he shouldn't have put villages in 1.8. Goddamnit Notch.
No point of villages without villagers, no point of XP without any reason for it. Hell, I think I would be happy if 1.8 was just the new terrain generation and everything else was bundled in 1.9. He should have done that, called 1.8 the 'world' update and 1.9 the 'adventure' update.
No point of villages without villagers, no point of XP without any reason for it. Hell, I think I would be happy if 1.8 was just the new terrain generation and everything else was bundled in 1.9. He should have done that, called 1.8 the 'world' update and 1.9 the 'adventure' update.
Grinchy
Banned
This is why, in my new world, I have only explored the amount of area that would fit in a map. I don't go beyond those borders, because when 1.9 comes out, I'd like to just take my long ass minecart track to the edge of my currently usable area and start generating some new chunks.
This is my plan, at least. I have no idea if that will work the way I'm hoping it works.
This is my plan, at least. I have no idea if that will work the way I'm hoping it works.
Houston3000
Member
That's basically what I've done, there's a small chunk I haven't walked over to yet but, for the most part, I simply explored one maps worth of terrain and, surprisingly (luckily maybe) I didn't find any villages. Every other world I generated had a village relatively close to spawn. If I did find one though I would probably just mine it for the resources at this point and replace it with a monument of some sort.Grinchy said:
Mengy
wishes it were bannable to say mean things about Marvel
Grinchy said:
That is what I am doing too. My new world has a huge mountain right at the spawn which is also the intersection point of four different biomes, but I have just stayed right on (and inside) that mountain and done my best to generate as little new land around the spawn as possible. So far I've done pretty good. I created the exact same world in creative mode and explored around and I freaking love this map, but in my SSP world I'm not going to explore any of it at all, nor enter the nether at all, not until 1.9 comes out and the following are in the game:
- snow biomes
- improved swamp biomes
- NPC's in villages
- red flowers come back
- new improved nether
- volcano biomes (I think this is still planned for 1.9?)
Hopefully it all meshes nicely with the 1.8 land generation. If not then I'll just restart my new world AGAIN for 1.9. It's kind of why I'm spending more time messing around with creative mode for now, because I'm not sure if my 1.8 world will be kept or not. Time will tell...
Houston3000
Member
Um...
@Notch Twitter:
1 hour ago
Splitting it up more or just unannounced adventure mode stuff in 1.10?
@Notch Twitter:
1 hour ago
We'll do a 1.9 pre-release today, and a full release after feedback. More Adventure Mode content will come in 1.10, we're splitting it up!
Splitting it up more or just unannounced adventure mode stuff in 1.10?
Capt.Haddock
Member
Mik2121 said:
Npc,1 friendly craft able mob,Missing and 1 new bioms, some nether mob and other fixes.(atleast this is what notch and jeb hinted in twitter}
British Monsoon
Member
Aguirre said:
If you recreate a world with the exact same title it should respawn you in your lost world, although it will probably place you in a new spawn point, so you may have to do some exploring and use a mapper program to find your base.
Aguirre said:
Tried opening the world with MCEdit?
I reverted back to 1.7.3 for IC² 1.0, Buildcraft 2.1.1 and Equivalent Exchange 3.55 - it's like a hundred times more addictive than vanilla Minecraft.
Already well on my way to destroying the beautiful landscape with machinery. Progress, hooo!
I don't really care about the "splitting it up" think, I like the fact that we're getting upgrades more often so if it takes 10 more little upgrades to get to the real adventure update(but they are like, weekly "leaks"), keep them coming! It'll get ugly for mods trying to keep up tho, unless one of the many early theorical updates is the mod update.
gutabo said:
I think it's better splitting it up too. If they break up the adventure update into bite sized chunks, then we can appreciate all the new little features which would otherwise be missed because the new, larger features such as new mobs, generating villages, tombs, etc.
Grinchy
Banned
BeltNotch said:
I could just be an idiot, but how does 1.9 progress to become 1.1?
Ohhhhh, so like this is Beta 1.9, and when they actually release it, it's Minecraft 1.1? Makes sense if you're a programmer, I guess =PTy4on said:Pretty sure it's Minecraft 1.1 of the full version
Grinchy said:
1.10, not 1.1 - 10 comes after 9.
1.9 could also be 1.09, but the zero is usually omitted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning