He single-handedly won us the World Series in 2004 according to our revisionist owners.
They are just trying to get everyone in the organization back on board the steroid train.
He single-handedly won us the World Series in 2004 according to our revisionist owners.
They are just trying to get everyone in the organization back on board the steroid train.
Dear Jack Z,
Nick Swisher or Wil Myers would be awesome early Christmas presents. Just sayin'.
Dear Jack Z,
Nick Swisher or Wil Myers would be awesome early Christmas presents. Just sayin'.
angelsBrandon Webb wants to return to baseball next season. Wonder which team will be desperate enough to try that gamble.
Brandon Webb wants to return to baseball next season. Wonder which team will be desperate enough to try that gamble.
...for who?
Brandon Webb wants to return to baseball next season. Wonder which team will be desperate enough to try that gamble.
Brandon Webb wants to return to baseball next season. Wonder which team will be desperate enough to try that gamble.
Psylidge officially retiring.
I have selective reading, sorry.I can't believe you have me on ignore
WTF?who are you?
Gaborn?
I have selective reading, sorry.
I can't believe that Red Sox are suitors for Hamilton. It seems Heyman really believes it.
Why?
He's a great player. He fills a huge hole, they have money to spend.
Why?
He's a great player. He fills a huge hole, they have money to spend.
He's injury prone and they are going to be paying for his down years.
Thats exactly why its so plausible for Boston to sign him.
Signing Hamilton is okay as long as you don't give him any more than 5 years. He's going to have durability issues.
Dear Jack Z,
Nick Swisher or Wil Myers would be awesome early Christmas presents. Just sayin'.
dude, too soon.who are you?
Gaborn?
You sir, are an old man!dude, too soon.
also, is anyone watching MLB network right now? they are recapping the 1987 season. that was a fun year
You sir, are an old man!
Rangers have brought Soto back on a one year deal.
Oh shit I didn't mean to say Gaborn.
I meant the political guy who got banned with the Evangelion avatar.
Shit sorry
OT won't be the same without Gaborn
I would probably have a problem with Shields for Espinosa. That is a lot of value you're expecting Shields to make up, especially considering the two players are at different ends of their careers. It would only make sense if the Nats think Rendon is ready to go, right now, and that he can play an elite 2B.I'd have zero problem with Shields. I'd prefer the free agent route though.
I would probably have a problem with Shields for Espinosa. That is a lot of value you're expecting Shields to make up, especially considering the two players are at different ends of their careers. It would only make sense if the Nats think Rendon is ready to go, right now, and that he can play an elite 2B.
I would probably have a problem with Shields for Espinosa. That is a lot of value you're expecting Shields to make up, especially considering the two players are at different ends of their careers. It would only make sense if the Nats think Rendon is ready to go, right now, and that he can play an elite 2B.
If they were both the same age, that would be an amazing deal for the Nats, but they aren't. I would expect Espinosa to minimally be between 3 and 4 WAR again for quite a few years. I don't think I can expect that from Shields, though I haven't looked at any ZIPS projections recently or anything. Additionally, there are other external options that the Nats have for a pitcher, but their only options for a 2B are really Lombardozzi (who is fine, but would represent quite a bit of lost value compared to Espinosa) and Rendon (who as far as I know the Nats aren't ready to bring up just yet), so it wouldn't necessarily even be a win next year.What the fuck am I reading...
Espinosa has a career .727 OPS..
And he's an overpay for James Shields....
If they were both the same age, that would be an amazing deal for the Nats, but they aren't. I would expect Espinosa to minimally be between 3 and 4 WAR again for quite a few years. I don't think I can expect that from Shields, though I haven't looked at any ZIPS projections recently or anything. Additionally, there are other external options that the Nats have for a pitcher, but their only options for a 2B are really Lombardozzi (who is fine, but would represent quite a bit of lost value compared to Espinosa) and Rendon (who as far as I know the Nats aren't ready to bring up just yet), so it wouldn't necessarily even be a win next year.
Well, obviously it depends how much you value Espinosa, who actually gets a lot of value out of his defense, while you're primarily focusing on his offense, which is basically a few HRs, some hit by pitches, and lots of strikeouts. Look around the league and ask yourself where all the elite second basemen are; I think you'll find that Espinosa has more value than you're giving him credit for, especially since his natural position is shortstop. It also depends how much you value Shields, of course. He is a very good pitcher, but again--taking a look at some pitcher aging curves, he's likely going nowhere but down from here. Personally I'm indifferent to whether Morse is thrown into the trade; do the Rays really need a first baseman?I don't think Espinosa is anywhere near that good. Decrease in walk rate, increase in strikeout rate - neither of which were great before last season and he was an extremely poor hitter last season even with a huge BABIP.
Shields is 31. If the Rays traded Shields for Espinosa, Bud Selig should step in for baseball reasons because its nothing more than a salary dump.
Espinosa + Morse makes more sense but I think thats still a poor deal for the Rays.
Isn't Espinosa a prett brilliant short stop? Your Mets might not play defense Darkside, but some teams do still value it.