DUFFMCWALIN
Member
Lol, they scored a run against him. Is that really a 'holy shit' line?
Ok let me rephrase that, Holy Shit Tim what the fuck?
Edit: remember he had a 5 plus era.
Lol, they scored a run against him. Is that really a 'holy shit' line?
Lol, they scored a run against him. Is that really a 'holy shit' line?
Welcome to the postseason, where Kris Medlen gets a loss, Barry Zito & Mike Leake start a playoff game, and Tim Lincecum remembers how to pitch.
At least A-Rod and Swisher are continuing their playoff incompetence to keep things even.
What time is Game 5?
Counterpoint: there is no way the Braves win with Chipper on the field.
Countercounterpoint: there is no way the Reds win with Dusty in the dugout.
Which makes me sad, actually.
That was close
Countercounterpoint: there is no way the Reds win with Dusty in the dugout.
Which makes me sad, actually.
You should post in here more often. Stay away from gaming.
Will likely be his last game tomorrow, I imagine. I'm hearing he's not quite all there after the stroke.
I only care about sports when local teams are in playoffs, yep I'm that guy
Bucket of balls for Fredi Gonzalez and a year supply of your alcoholic beverage of choice.Will likely be his last game tomorrow, I imagine. I'm hearing he's not quite all there after the stroke.
If Lincecum pitches the 9th inning, he'll get a save.
What time is Game 5?
Will likely be his last game tomorrow, I imagine. I'm hearing he's not quite all there after the stroke.
Will likely be his last game tomorrow, I imagine. I'm hearing he's not quite all there after the stroke.
Will likely be his last game tomorrow, I imagine. I'm hearing he's not quite all there after the stroke.
This game makes me pissed off that Barry Zito earned the win pitching 3 damn innings.
This game makes me pissed off that Barry Zito earned the win pitching 3 damn innings.
This game makes me pissed off that Barry Zito earned the win pitching 3 damn innings.
Will likely be his last game tomorrow, I imagine. I'm hearing he's not quite all there after the stroke.
really? I thought it was the last reliever in before the lead change.the win goes to the relief pitcher that did the best work at the discretion of the official scorer.
really? I thought it was the last reliever in before the lead change.
I thought you couldn't win a game unless you pitched 5 innings and leave with the lead?
I suppose I meant to say that they've not lost in 12 straight Zito appearances. Regardless of how he pithces, they seem to win with him on the mound. Maybe their offense know that they need runs and they play extra hard or something lol.
really? I thought it was the last reliever in before the lead change.
Never heard that. I've always heard it was the most effective reliever to be decided by the official scorer.
hmm looks like you are right.10.17 Winning And Losing Pitcher
(a) The official scorer shall credit as the winning pitcher that pitcher whose team assumes a lead while such pitcher is in the game, or during the inning on offense in which such pitcher is removed from the game, and does not relinquish such lead, unless
(1) such pitcher is a starting pitcher and Rule 10.17(b) applies; or
(2) Rule 10.17(c) applies.
Rule 10.17(a) Comment: Whenever the score is tied, the game becomes a new contest insofar as the winning pitcher is concerned. Once the opposing team assumes the lead, all pitchers who have pitched up to that point and have been replaced are excluded from being credited with the victory. If the pitcher against whose pitching the opposing team gained the lead continues to pitch until his team regains the lead, which it holds to the finish of the game, that pitcher shall be the winning pitcher.
(b) If the pitcher whose team assumes a lead while such pitcher is in the game, or during the inning on offense in which such pitcher is removed from the game, and does not relinquish such lead, is a starting pitcher who has not completed
(1) five innings of a game that lasts six or more innings on defense, or
(2) four innings of a game that lasts five innings on defense, then the official scorer shall credit as the winning pitcher the relief pitcher, if there is only one relief pitcher, or the relief pitcher who, in the official scorer’s judgment was the most effective, if there is more than one relief pitcher.
Rule 10.17(b) Comment: It is the intent of Rule 10.17(b) that a relief pitcher pitch at least one complete inning or pitch when a crucial out is made, within the context of the game (including the score), in order to be credited as the winning pitcher. If the first relief pitcher pitches effectively, the official scorer should not presumptively credit that pitcher with the win, because the rule requires that the win be credited to the pitcher who was the most effective, and a subsequent relief pitcher may have been most effective. The official scorer, in determining which relief pitcher was the most effective, should consider the number of runs, earned runs and base runners given up by each relief pitcher and the context of the game at the time of each relief pitcher’s appearance. If two or more relief pitchers were similarly effective, the official scorer should give the presumption to the earlier pitcher as the winning pitcher.
(c) The official scorer shall not credit as the winning pitcher a relief pitcher who is ineffective in a brief appearance, when at least one succeeding relief pitcher pitches effectively in helping his team maintain its lead. In such a case, the official scorer shall credit as the winning pitcher the succeeding relief pitcher who was most effective, in the judgment of the official scorer.
Rule 10.17(c) Comment: The official scorer generally should, but is not required to, consider the appearance of a relief pitcher to be ineffective and brief if such relief pitcher pitches less than one inning and allows two or more earned runs to score (even if such runs are charged to a previous pitcher). Rule 10.17(b) Comment provides guidance on choosing the winning pitcher from among several succeeding relief pitchers.
(d) A losing pitcher is a pitcher who is responsible for the run that gives the winning team a lead that the winning team does not relinquish.
Rule 10.17(d) Comment: Whenever the score is tied, the game becomes a new contest insofar as the losing pitcher is concerned.
(e) A league may designate a non-championship game (for example, the Major League All-Star Game) for which Rules 10.17(a)(1) and 10.17(b) do not apply. In such games, the official scorer shall credit as the winning pitcher that pitcher whose team assumes a lead while such pitcher is in the game, or during the inning on offense in which such pitcher is removed from the game, and does not relinquish such lead, unless such pitcher is knocked out after the winning team has attained a commanding lead and the official scorer concludes that a subsequent pitcher is entitled to credit as the winning pitcher.
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/official_rules/official_scorer_10.jsp
yeah good point, i was thinking of it being tied or them behind. (i was thinking zito was pitching not bizzaro zito). anyway this all proves how dumb the pitcher win is.Except there was no lead change. Giants always led.
Time for a REAL baseball game to start >.>
Time for a REAL baseball game to start >.>
let's do this.
He had a bad year, especially by his standards, but he was extremely unlucky. His FIP was a full run lower than his ERA, and his xFIP was 30 points lower than that. His ERA & FIP were the worst on the staff, but his xFIP was exactly the same as Matt Cain's, only behind Bumgarner.In a season where he was our worst pitcher (by far) and one of the worst pitchers in the entire league? Yea, just seeing a few 1-2-3 innings is more than enough to impress me.
EDIT: Also, Of Lincecum's first 40 pitches, 31 were strikes.