Killer Queen
Banned
GOTG2 and Ragnarok thoughThis is why I'm getting real tired of the whole connected universe stuff. It was really cool for the first two phases but now it just feels like it's getting in the way of creativity.
GOTG2 and Ragnarok thoughThis is why I'm getting real tired of the whole connected universe stuff. It was really cool for the first two phases but now it just feels like it's getting in the way of creativity.
Haven't seen GotG2 yet and I'm really optimistic for Ragnarok so I hope you're right. Believe me, having a connected universe that doesn't interfere with creativity is like a dream come true.GOTG2 and Ragnarok though
This is why I'm getting real tired of the whole connected universe stuff. It was really cool for the first two phases but now it just feels like it's getting in the way of creativity.
Haven't seen GotG2 yet and I'm really optimistic for Ragnarok so I hope you're right. Believe me, having a connected universe that doesn't interfere with creativity is like a dream come true.
I don't think such a long article/video is needed to type the words "Take the franchise away from Fox"
It doesn't interfere. You could absolutely set an FF movie in the 60's and connect it. They've already done the same with a movie set in the 40's and a tv show set in the 40s and 50's.
Of course they could. It could be really cool too. Have the first movie with them hopping dimensions with 60's tech and at the end they reappear on Earth, 50 years too late. Now they're in the modern MCU as fishes out of water, like Cap. Boom.
I'm talking about setting the entire movie/franchise in the 60s. Not starting them there and bringing them to present.
Parallax said:that would be worth it just for pym and reed to shit talk each other the whole time
fox non-withstanding, im kinda curious on marvels position on the fantastic 4. a lot of people like to give marvel heat for the recent events, but the 4 have been sandbagged for years when it comes to merchandising. no marvel appearances(outside of cameos) hell the only game appearance theyve made was their psx crap game. that seems pretty odd.
that would be worth it just for pym and reed to shit talk each other the whole time
that would be worth it just for pym and reed to shit talk each other the whole time
I don't think such a long article/video is needed to type the words "Take the franchise away from Fox"
I remember when Fant4stic was in the works I was thinking about ways Marvel could integrate the F4 into the MCU, and my thoughts were mostly along the same lines ie setting the origin in the 60s and throwing them forward through time.
Turns out a LOT of people seem to have independently come to the same conclusion, because that basic hook became really popular online.
Regardless, I liked Bob's specific pitch in regards to using the Puppetmaster rather than Doom, as well as his idea on how to movie-fy him.
I think the real question won't be introducing the F4 into the MCU eventually, as no matter how late in the game it is a similar hook would be easy to pull off and justify why they haven't been present. The X-Men are a bigger problem, if Marvel was to hypothetically ever get the rights back. At this point it would be so hard to naturally integrate it almost isn't worth it.
I believe it only has to be in active production, i.e. actually shooting.Seven, I think. They have to out out something every seven years, which means they have five left to get another film out.
I think they need no introduction, at the end of Infinity War 2, after credits, all scene turns to black.
Then this happens.
![]()
Cut out to see all Avengers sitting on a table.
Cut to black.
I believe it only has to be in active production, i.e. actually shooting.
I think the real question won't be introducing the F4 into the MCU eventually, as no matter how late in the game it is a similar hook would be easy to pull off and justify why they haven't been present. The X-Men are a bigger problem, if Marvel was to hypothetically ever get the rights back. At this point it would be so hard to naturally integrate it almost isn't worth it.
GOTG isn't perfect but i found it to be really creative (at least relative to the rest of the MCU) and i liked it a fair bit. Ragnarok seems more in that direction at least visually and story wise. Both very colorful, fun and fantastical.Haven't seen GotG2 yet and I'm really optimistic for Ragnarok so I hope you're right. Believe me, having a connected universe that doesn't interfere with creativity is like a dream come true.
I always thought centering the story on Doom's origin would be a good idea and spin the rest out of that. He has the most interesting backstory.
Yes to Spidey and Torch interactions. Yes to saving Doom for a sequel.
Unsure of Puppet Master as first villain (particularly as described) even if Bob did a decent job explaining it. Would prefer something more fantastical like Mole Man. Or Skrulls.
Josh Trank. Never heard of that original idea he had
I know Peyton Reed of Ant-Man wanted to do a FF movie set in the 1960s or something like that.
Slaters script not only covers the origin story of the Fantastic Four and Doctor Doom, but also Herbie the Robot, the FantastiCar (which was shot but not included in the final movie), and villains Galactus and Mole Man.
The Negative Zone, as its called, isnt an empty wasteland, but is instead an alien civilization in ruins full of skeletons. They stumble upon one living thing: Galactus. The villain shoots Dark Matter out of his hands, enveloping and seemingly killing Doom. The others just barely make the return trip home, but Dark Matter is shot into the Quantum Gate, transforming the quartet.
In Latveria, the spies have completed their own Quantum Gate, but it heralds the arrival of a Victor Von Doom made entirely of Dark Matter. He subsequently takes over the country and begins a reign of terror.
One of the big action sequences is the Fantastic Four battling a giant Moloid in New York City, with humorous beats such as Ben being swallowed by the creature. Dr. Elder gets Moloid juice on him and becomes Mole Man.
The film concludes with a giant battle in Latveria against the shapeshifting Doom, who ultimately ends up being trapped in the Negative Zone as the Fantastic Four warn the government that Galactus is coming, setting up the sequel.
The Sony leaked emails probably provide some insight into how the deal with Fox is structured. IIRC Sony has to pay Marvel a fee 9 months post release for an extension rights. The rights then are 3 years 9 months from previous release to start principal photography and 5 years 9 months to release the movie.
Looking at the historical data, principal photography for Fan4stic began in May 2014, FF: ROTSS released in June 2007. We also know that Fox began photography at the last minute, in order to keep the rights. That suggests they have to begin photography 6 years 11 months after the previous movie's release. Presumably they would have to release it two years later, 8 years 11 months after the previous movie's release.
Looking at the above, and assuming we are in the right path and Fox has a similar extension option with Marvel that Sony has, then we can assume that Fox has to pay Marvel a fee within 11 months after release in order to extend the rights, so they would have had to pay Marvel a fee by July 2016. The rights would then extend and Fox would have to begin photography of a new FF by July 2022 and release it by July 2024.
Keep in mind that those deals are all garbage for Marvel. They were giving them away like candy in the 90s (but better than what they gave away and miraculously recovered in the 70s). IIRC Marvel only gets about 2% of the XMen movies BO gross lol (Deadpool is a different license, I think).
Interesting for the most part, but IIRC Marvel traded an extension on the F4 rights in order to get Daredevil back, so the turnaround is probably shorter in the actual contract than what we saw. That 6 years and 11 months would have to include the one-time extension.