Movies You’ve Watched Lately | OT | - 2025

Taken 2

The original Taken was an international hit (at least for a French production), so of course they made a sequel. This time our retired agent finds himself in Istanbul with his family, and the father of the last film's villain is looking for a revenge. As with the original, fast paced bad-ass action is served in huge numbers, but the heart and feel of the original is not there anymore. Maybe it's the change of director, but action scenes feel off with it's lightning-quick cuts, where it's difficult to follow what is going on at certain times. I still liked it, but I didn't love like I did with the original.
 
The Amateur

Another ex-tempore theater experience for me, as I did not plan to see this movie beforehand. It's always a gamble, and this time it did not really pay off. Rami Malek plays a CIA code decoder, whose wife is murdered by terrorists. Because he isn't a natural killer, he creates his own devices to counter terrorist threat. The premise game promise, but execution was sloppy and far too slow to interest me for the whole 2 hour duration. It was great to see Rachel Brosnahan on the big screen, in anticipation of Superman. She's one gorgeous woman. Great actor, too.
 

Overall, I liked it, but of course they had to throw in a love interest storyline (It's a movie with Colin Firth after all), just like every other damn movie. It ended up dragging some parts of the plot

I already knew the events going in, so that made watching it a bit more enjoyable I think. Still, it could've been better.

Most of the characters felt like caricatures or something. It's like the film was more interested in fitting them into neat dramatic boxes than actually fleshing them out as individuals. You never really get the sense that these were real people involved in a risky, nuanced operation. It kind of undercuts the tension when everyone feels like a walking trope

Nonetheless, the actual operation itself is undeniably brilliant. I still can't get over the fact that it actually worked
 
Den of Thieves 2: Pantera

Sequel to a memorably gritty action heist flick about blurred lines between cops and robbers.

This one is…decidedly not as good. Hard to maintain suspension of disbelief. Why does anyone trust Nick? Without any incredible, deal-sealing loyalty test at all. Why do they even want him around? They find a use for him later, but only afterwards. So many plot contrivances. Nice Cube is not very convincing in his role, either, and has a few fumbled line reads with semi technical jargon that come off as ridiculous.

Long, slow middle act of getting to know the (largely uninteresting) thieves with a pretty good eventual heist payoff, but not a strong recommend.
I'm just very sad that smoking hot chick never had to follow through with getting sweaty with old ass Gerard Butler :P

Some decent shoot outs but I agree, it felt like for an already long, languid film, an hour was cut out.
 
I tried to watch G20 with Viola Davis, all buff from Warrior Queen, try to be an action heroine. Alas, she has neither the past record to fall back on (like Harrison Ford) or a familiar track record (we've seen her in everything, but she is rarely the lead in anything I watch) to capitalize on. So it just feels very formulaic. Nice to hear Anthony Starrs real(?) accent.

I forget which thread had it, but that vide posted about a week about about how 'modern' digital cinematography is all neutral, filmed to be a flat as possible to accommodate post processing effects and ease editing and whatnot, is ABSOLUYELY TRUE with this film. You can't really point a finger at any specific thing or scene, but the entire film is just ugly in its blandness. Every shot, every scene, every frame is gratingly average. hrow in the most generic script imaginable and it is VERY easy to think this was a 100% AI generated experience.
 
I watched Terrifier 3, I preferred the second one as the kills now just feel repeated and this wasn't doing much of anything new, outside of learning some lore.

The writing in the last 20 mins is pretty bad too, coming off forced to setup certain results for the next movie.
 
I went to see Last Breath in the theater.

Based on a true story about a team of deep-diving oil pipeline maintenance workers who try to save one of the guys on their team after he gets abandoned on the sea floor.

The director also directed a documentary about the same story a few years ago.

It was refreshing to see an uncynical movie about a true story--with few embellishments--about people putting their lives on the line for someone else.
I'm in! I needed something like this
 
Another funny bit about G20, the intro has a girl trying to sell a hard drive with 70 mill bitcoin on it, FOR CASH.

Like, girl, that bitcoin IS CASH. It's like trying to fence a suitcase full of $100 bills for a duffle bag of $20 bills :p Obviously the script writers sorta kinda know about bitcoin but think it is something that has to be fenced, like diamonds or artwork :p


edit: "Shit, you're from Wakanda"

ok, I giggled at that one :P
 
Last edited:
So I'm palate cleansing woth one of my all time favorite Westerns, Quigley Down Under. Not only a great film with the likes of Tom Selleck at his mustachioed best and Alan Rickman chewing scenery like it is going out of style, but coming from the flat digital world to the rich, nigh technicolor film cinematography of this mid-80s romp is just a joy,

v5FmmJ7.jpeg

wTixg0z.jpeg
 
Moved on to Cyborg, a very early Jean Claude Van Damm film. Most notable for the blue eyed swarthy giant bad guy and the, for the time, very nihilistic post-apocalyptic savagery.

MsPGluU.jpeg
wUYREtn.jpeg

the girl is quite cute, don't really recall her in anything else.

And of course, there is an infamous JCVD split...

3VRMbLJ.jpeg
 
Novacaine
Didn't care for it. Couple good scenes but was bored in the last third. The sidekick from Spiderman is in it and he looks off, like RuPaul and the Rock had a kid and they glued eyebrows on.
 
So I'm palate cleansing woth one of my all time favorite Westerns, Quigley Down Under. Not only a great film with the likes of Tom Selleck at his mustachioed best and Alan Rickman chewing scenery like it is going out of style, but coming from the flat digital world to the rich, nigh technicolor film cinematography of this mid-80s romp is just a joy,

v5FmmJ7.jpeg

wTixg0z.jpeg

This is a great movie.
 
A Touch of Zen

A classic you hear about from movie buffs, so I gave it a chance. It's good, the lead woman is great and the iconic camera work the movie is known for stands out.

8 out of 10

---

Starship Troopers 2: Hero of the Federation

I wanna see all of the Starship Trooper films, there is three live-action and two animated ones. The second one has a budget of $30 and is a horror movie where the bugs take over humans and control them. The whole movie takes place within an outpost, imagine "The Thing" with a Starship Troopers theme. But with no budget, cheap actors, and with a straight to DVD feel to it.

0.1 out of 10
 
Taken 3

Even if they started running the same circles with part 3, they eventually made 3. This was a bit different in a way where Neeson's character doesn't go abroad, and instead has to save himself as he is wrongfully accused of murder. No one gets actually taken in this film either. If you have seen the previous films, you know what to expect. Director Olivier Megaton has improved a bit, although car chase scenes are still difficult to follow due to confusing editing. It's fun, better than 2, but can't touch the original.
 
I tried to watch G20 with Viola Davis, all buff from Warrior Queen, try to be an action heroine. Alas, she has neither the past record to fall back on (like Harrison Ford) or a familiar track record (we've seen her in everything, but she is rarely the lead in anything I watch) to capitalize on. So it just feels very formulaic. Nice to hear Anthony Starrs real(?) accent.

I forget which thread had it, but that vide posted about a week about about how 'modern' digital cinematography is all neutral, filmed to be a flat as possible to accommodate post processing effects and ease editing and whatnot, is ABSOLUYELY TRUE with this film. You can't really point a finger at any specific thing or scene, but the entire film is just ugly in its blandness. Every shot, every scene, every frame is gratingly average. hrow in the most generic script imaginable and it is VERY easy to think this was a 100% AI generated experience.

I'll skip that one. But I did enjoy Nerdrotic's funny critique.

 
Caligula - Debauchery. 1/5. Every performance is insane. Peter OToole debasing himself for this is sad. Malcolm McDowell is crazy in this. Everyone in this film is basically crazy. Just like Caligula.
 
medium-arnold-schwarzenegger-kristanna-loken-movies-terminator-3-original-imaga36wk2ntrfk7.jpeg


I liked it. The movie has good action scenes. Good characters. Good effects. It's not as good as the previous one, but overall I thought it was a good movie.
When compared to some of the new ones it is like Shakespeare. But compared to T1 or T2 it is like plan 9 from outer space.
 
A working Man - He only works in the first 5 minutes and then he just kills everyone. 3/5

A jason Statham action movie. If you like those, this is another one, and I thought it was a watchable one.
 
12 Angry Men (1957)

Picked up a classic this time, one I had never seen before. The film is very simple, 12 jurors discuss a murder case for 90 minutes, and try to choose whether the accused is guilty or innocent. During that time, we learn different aspects of these juror's and why they think the way they think. Despite being a simple film, it's captivating and hooking film even today, almost 70 years later. I know this film has a remake, but I also remember watching a TV series once, that had an episode like this. Almost every story beat of that episode came directly from this. And I'm sure it's not the only one.
 
12 Angry Men (1957)

Picked up a classic this time, one I had never seen before. The film is very simple, 12 jurors discuss a murder case for 90 minutes, and try to choose whether the accused is guilty or innocent. During that time, we learn different aspects of these juror's and why they think the way they think. Despite being a simple film, it's captivating and hooking film even today, almost 70 years later. I know this film has a remake, but I also remember watching a TV series once, that had an episode like this. Almost every story beat of that episode came directly from this. And I'm sure it's not the only one.

One of my all time favorites ❤️
 
Moved on to Cyborg, a very early Jean Claude Van Damm film. Most notable for the blue eyed swarthy giant bad guy and the, for the time, very nihilistic post-apocalyptic savagery.

MsPGluU.jpeg
wUYREtn.jpeg

the girl is quite cute, don't really recall her in anything else.

And of course, there is an infamous JCVD split...

3VRMbLJ.jpeg
aaaaaaaaarrrggggaaaaraagarGrarggrgrgrgrgaaaaaaaaaaaagrgrgrrggrrrgeAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagrgrgrggrgrgrr
tumblr_pan2utN6r01we0p6lo1_400.gif


legit terrifying acting from that dude
 
Stardust

I recently learned this os based on a novel published by DC comics. Since I have most of the others DC films on Blu, and this was cheap, I thought what the heck, why not. It was apparently marketed as a big fantasy summer film of 2007, but underperformed at box office. It's a fine fantasy adventure, with pretty predictable plot, and dated GCI in the mix. For a family movie, there are also quite many scenes that could be considered... fetish stuff. Maybe we were more innocent 20 years ago.
 
The Thing

Boy howdy is this movie a treat. I've seen it loads of times, but somehow my son had never seen it before. Great atmosphere, good horror elements, fun practical effects. I heard they remade this, but I'm glad that's just a rumor...

National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon 1

I haven't seen this movie in nearly 30 years, but it holds up surprisingly well. The jokes might fly over the head of anyone under 40 though. Sam Jackson was great in this! Tons of fun cameos: Whoopi Goldberg, Dennis Leary, Bruce Willis, James Doohan, Charlie Sheen, Denise Campbell, Corey Feldman, Phil Hartman... and that's all in addition to the regular cast rounded out by Emilio Estevez and William Shatner. The jokes are goofball but the movie overall is great.
 
The Thing

Boy howdy is this movie a treat. I've seen it loads of times, but somehow my son had never seen it before. Great atmosphere, good horror elements, fun practical effects. I heard they remade this, but I'm glad that's just a rumor...
In my top 5 of all time. Perfect movie.

Edit: It was a prequel, not a straight up remake. Centred around the Norwegian camp, watchable, but only just.
 
Last edited:

Its a loose adaptation of a real hostage situation that happened in February 2022

Had to check it out since it's a local film. It was okay, but man, Dutch acting always reminds me why I usually steer clear from these

The title iHostage doesn't do it any favors either, it reeks of something straight-to-streaming. Which it technically is, but you know what I mean
 
Last edited:
Stardust

I recently learned this os based on a novel published by DC comics. Since I have most of the others DC films on Blu, and this was cheap, I thought what the heck, why not. It was apparently marketed as a big fantasy summer film of 2007, but underperformed at box office. It's a fine fantasy adventure, with pretty predictable plot, and dated GCI in the mix. For a family movie, there are also quite many scenes that could be considered... fetish stuff. Maybe we were more innocent 20 years ago.

I prefer the book which is written by Neil Gaimen. The movie was boring
 
Stardust

I recently learned this os based on a novel published by DC comics. Since I have most of the others DC films on Blu, and this was cheap, I thought what the heck, why not. It was apparently marketed as a big fantasy summer film of 2007, but underperformed at box office. It's a fine fantasy adventure, with pretty predictable plot, and dated GCI in the mix. For a family movie, there are also quite many scenes that could be considered... fetish stuff. Maybe we were more innocent 20 years ago.
That was Niel Geiman, right? I think I did read the novel. Liked the film as well. De Niro really had fun with it. Pre-dare devil Charlie Cox, Sienna Miller OH MY GOD is she hot and hey, Claire Danes is in there (always a crush from My so called life). I think i had it on HD-DVD (oh man, anyone remember that format????) and its probably on blu ray in my cabinet somewhere. I think I will always go to Princess Bride or Labyrinth/Legend for the dreamy fantasy fix but this one was aight.
 
Terminator Salvation + Terminator Genisys

T4 I thought was an ok movie overall. good action scenes, I liked the new machines, I liked the futuristic setting. story is ok, not very impressive but not horrible.

T5 on the other hand, was a very disappointing movie. By far the worst Terminator movie I've seen so far. It had a confusing and mediocre story. I didn't like the main actors, with the exception of the legendary Schwarzenegger. The action scenes were very weak and lacked impact. Overall, I found it to be a very mediocre movie, to say the least.
 
So I'm going through the M:I series in prep for the newest one. The quality jump from 2 to 3 is IMMENSE. I've seen all of these in theater. M:I has that quirky De Palma vibe with all the camera angles and obtuse plotting. 2 though, wooooow that DID NOT hold up well. All the "stylish" John Woo ques are bad. Thandie Newton...always delish, but otherwise that film is a comedy at this point with that swirly camera shots, pigeons outta nowhere, and motorcycle stunts that just make you giggle. Cruises hair alone is worth the price of mockery.

But 3, for all the silly J.J. camera lens flare, is a quantum jump in seriousness that puts M:I above Bond at this point. The action is tight, the stakes feel real, and the intensity from frame 1 to the end is palpable.

After this is the McQuarrie era which is basically a looong serialized story. IIRC there are some silly elements with Pegg and Rhames but the stuntwork becomes legendary.

Edit: And Magie Q is in M:I 3 and she looks EXACTLY THE SAME as a film she was in from 2024. EXACTLY. That asian pearl cream doing the WORK!!!! :P
 
Last edited:
So I'm going through the M:I series in prep for the newest one. The quality jump from 2 to 3 is IMMENSE. I've seen all of these in theater. M:I has that quirky De Palma vibe with all the camera angles and obtuse plotting. 2 though, wooooow that DID NOT hold up well. All the "stylish" John Woo ques are bad. Thandie Newton...always delish, but otherwise that film is a comedy at this point with that swirly camera shots, pigeons outta nowhere, and motorcycle stunts that just make you giggle. Cruises hair alone is worth the price of mockery.

But 3, for all the silly J.J. camera lens flare, is a quantum jump in seriousness that puts M:I above Bond at this point. The action is tight, the stakes feel real, and the intensity from frame 1 to the end is palpable.

After this is the McQuarrie era which is basically a looong serialized story. IIRC there are some silly elements with Pegg and Rhames but the stuntwork becomes legendary.

Edit: And Magie Q is in M:I 3 and she looks EXACTLY THE SAME as a film she was in from 2024. EXACTLY. That asian pearl cream doing the WORK!!!! :P
I watched them all last year, and I agree with 3, it stands out.

2 is completely laughable, the first one is ok but it relies so heavily on twists. Since I had seen it before, it didn't affect me much this time around.

The others feels like a blur, I can barely tell them apart. I remember some stunts, like when he was outside the huge building in Dubai. But generally I don't like the last 3-4 as much as three.

The stunts are insane but the plots are trash. That main skinny bird looking villain guy is trash.
 
Arthur & Merlin: Knights of Camelot 2020

Despite the name, this is all about Arthur's midlife crisis and his incel son playing too much "No Mercy". 4/10
 
A Working Man

It was a Jason Statham movie
 
Cg18M21.jpeg


I don't get it. I don't get how this won an Oscar. I don't get the ending. I don't get why the director/writer thought this would be a compelling story to tell. The entire film was predictable and forgettable.

That said, weirdly enough, I enjoyed watching it. What kept me engaged were the characters' behaviours, motives, and outcomes - all of which felt grounded in reality.
 
So I'm going through the M:I series in prep for the newest one. The quality jump from 2 to 3 is IMMENSE. I've seen all of these in theater. M:I has that quirky De Palma vibe with all the camera angles and obtuse plotting. 2 though, wooooow that DID NOT hold up well. All the "stylish" John Woo ques are bad. Thandie Newton...always delish, but otherwise that film is a comedy at this point with that swirly camera shots, pigeons outta nowhere, and motorcycle stunts that just make you giggle. Cruises hair alone is worth the price of mockery.

But 3, for all the silly J.J. camera lens flare, is a quantum jump in seriousness that puts M:I above Bond at this point. The action is tight, the stakes feel real, and the intensity from frame 1 to the end is palpable.

After this is the McQuarrie era which is basically a looong serialized story. IIRC there are some silly elements with Pegg and Rhames but the stuntwork becomes legendary.

Edit: And Magie Q is in M:I 3 and she looks EXACTLY THE SAME as a film she was in from 2024. EXACTLY. That asian pearl cream doing the WORK!!!! :P
3 is my favourite, closely followed by the first one.
 
MI is generally one of the most consistent long running movie series. Except 2 all of them are great.
Mostly agree with that, except Dead Reckoning. I don't think I even finished it, seemed to resemble the Fast and Furious franchise more than MI.

And yeah 2 was hilarious for all the wrong reasons.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom