p_xavier
Authorized Fister
It's probably my favourite of his. If you're interested in delving deeper into the film I'd recommend checking out this video
What a great little documentary. I feel the decay and erosion of society everyday.
It's probably my favourite of his. If you're interested in delving deeper into the film I'd recommend checking out this video
I'm just very sad that smoking hot chick never had to follow through with getting sweaty with old ass Gerard ButlerDen of Thieves 2: Pantera
Sequel to a memorably gritty action heist flick about blurred lines between cops and robbers.
This one is…decidedly not as good. Hard to maintain suspension of disbelief. Why does anyone trust Nick? Without any incredible, deal-sealing loyalty test at all. Why do they even want him around? They find a use for him later, but only afterwards. So many plot contrivances. Nice Cube is not very convincing in his role, either, and has a few fumbled line reads with semi technical jargon that come off as ridiculous.
Long, slow middle act of getting to know the (largely uninteresting) thieves with a pretty good eventual heist payoff, but not a strong recommend.
I'm in! I needed something like thisI went to see Last Breath in the theater.
![]()
Based on a true story about a team of deep-diving oil pipeline maintenance workers who try to save one of the guys on their team after he gets abandoned on the sea floor.
The director also directed a documentary about the same story a few years ago.
It was refreshing to see an uncynical movie about a true story--with few embellishments--about people putting their lives on the line for someone else.
Eraser is amazing.Eraser
Not Arnie's best. It was okay. Nothing particularly great about anything.
So I'm palate cleansing woth one of my all time favorite Westerns, Quigley Down Under. Not only a great film with the likes of Tom Selleck at his mustachioed best and Alan Rickman chewing scenery like it is going out of style, but coming from the flat digital world to the rich, nigh technicolor film cinematography of this mid-80s romp is just a joy,
![]()
![]()
I tried to watch G20 with Viola Davis, all buff from Warrior Queen, try to be an action heroine. Alas, she has neither the past record to fall back on (like Harrison Ford) or a familiar track record (we've seen her in everything, but she is rarely the lead in anything I watch) to capitalize on. So it just feels very formulaic. Nice to hear Anthony Starrs real(?) accent.
I forget which thread had it, but that vide posted about a week about about how 'modern' digital cinematography is all neutral, filmed to be a flat as possible to accommodate post processing effects and ease editing and whatnot, is ABSOLUYELY TRUE with this film. You can't really point a finger at any specific thing or scene, but the entire film is just ugly in its blandness. Every shot, every scene, every frame is gratingly average. hrow in the most generic script imaginable and it is VERY easy to think this was a 100% AI generated experience.
When compared to some of the new ones it is like Shakespeare. But compared to T1 or T2 it is like plan 9 from outer space.![]()
I liked it. The movie has good action scenes. Good characters. Good effects. It's not as good as the previous one, but overall I thought it was a good movie.
Can't believe I missed this one, it's superb.
![]()
I liked it. The movie has good action scenes. Good characters. Good effects. It's not as good as the previous one, but overall I thought it was a good movie.
12 Angry Men (1957)
Picked up a classic this time, one I had never seen before. The film is very simple, 12 jurors discuss a murder case for 90 minutes, and try to choose whether the accused is guilty or innocent. During that time, we learn different aspects of these juror's and why they think the way they think. Despite being a simple film, it's captivating and hooking film even today, almost 70 years later. I know this film has a remake, but I also remember watching a TV series once, that had an episode like this. Almost every story beat of that episode came directly from this. And I'm sure it's not the only one.
Caddo Lake.
Was alright, like a light version of the epic show Dark.
![]()
aaaaaaaaarrrggggaaaaraagarGrarggrgrgrgrgaaaaaaaaaaaagrgrgrrggrrrgeAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagrgrgrggrgrgrrMoved on to Cyborg, a very early Jean Claude Van Damm film. Most notable for the blue eyed swarthy giant bad guy and the, for the time, very nihilistic post-apocalyptic savagery.
![]()
![]()
the girl is quite cute, don't really recall her in anything else.
And of course, there is an infamous JCVD split...
![]()
In my top 5 of all time. Perfect movie.The Thing
Boy howdy is this movie a treat. I've seen it loads of times, but somehow my son had never seen it before. Great atmosphere, good horror elements, fun practical effects. I heard they remade this, but I'm glad that's just a rumor...
Stardust
I recently learned this os based on a novel published by DC comics. Since I have most of the others DC films on Blu, and this was cheap, I thought what the heck, why not. It was apparently marketed as a big fantasy summer film of 2007, but underperformed at box office. It's a fine fantasy adventure, with pretty predictable plot, and dated GCI in the mix. For a family movie, there are also quite many scenes that could be considered... fetish stuff. Maybe we were more innocent 20 years ago.
That was Niel Geiman, right? I think I did read the novel. Liked the film as well. De Niro really had fun with it. Pre-dare devil Charlie Cox, Sienna Miller OH MY GOD is she hot and hey, Claire Danes is in there (always a crush from My so called life). I think i had it on HD-DVD (oh man, anyone remember that format????) and its probably on blu ray in my cabinet somewhere. I think I will always go to Princess Bride or Labyrinth/Legend for the dreamy fantasy fix but this one was aight.Stardust
I recently learned this os based on a novel published by DC comics. Since I have most of the others DC films on Blu, and this was cheap, I thought what the heck, why not. It was apparently marketed as a big fantasy summer film of 2007, but underperformed at box office. It's a fine fantasy adventure, with pretty predictable plot, and dated GCI in the mix. For a family movie, there are also quite many scenes that could be considered... fetish stuff. Maybe we were more innocent 20 years ago.
Just finished this. This movie was not for me. Can't believe it is from the same guy that gave us Parasite. Two out of Five.![]()
I was expecting a completely different kind of movie, and in the end, I was pretty let down. It just didn't turn out to be as entertaining as I had hoped. It was actually bad compared to Parasite
I watched them all last year, and I agree with 3, it stands out.So I'm going through the M:I series in prep for the newest one. The quality jump from 2 to 3 is IMMENSE. I've seen all of these in theater. M:I has that quirky De Palma vibe with all the camera angles and obtuse plotting. 2 though, wooooow that DID NOT hold up well. All the "stylish" John Woo ques are bad. Thandie Newton...always delish, but otherwise that film is a comedy at this point with that swirly camera shots, pigeons outta nowhere, and motorcycle stunts that just make you giggle. Cruises hair alone is worth the price of mockery.
But 3, for all the silly J.J. camera lens flare, is a quantum jump in seriousness that puts M:I above Bond at this point. The action is tight, the stakes feel real, and the intensity from frame 1 to the end is palpable.
After this is the McQuarrie era which is basically a looong serialized story. IIRC there are some silly elements with Pegg and Rhames but the stuntwork becomes legendary.
Edit: And Magie Q is in M:I 3 and she looks EXACTLY THE SAME as a film she was in from 2024. EXACTLY. That asian pearl cream doing the WORK!!!!![]()
3 is my favourite, closely followed by the first one.So I'm going through the M:I series in prep for the newest one. The quality jump from 2 to 3 is IMMENSE. I've seen all of these in theater. M:I has that quirky De Palma vibe with all the camera angles and obtuse plotting. 2 though, wooooow that DID NOT hold up well. All the "stylish" John Woo ques are bad. Thandie Newton...always delish, but otherwise that film is a comedy at this point with that swirly camera shots, pigeons outta nowhere, and motorcycle stunts that just make you giggle. Cruises hair alone is worth the price of mockery.
But 3, for all the silly J.J. camera lens flare, is a quantum jump in seriousness that puts M:I above Bond at this point. The action is tight, the stakes feel real, and the intensity from frame 1 to the end is palpable.
After this is the McQuarrie era which is basically a looong serialized story. IIRC there are some silly elements with Pegg and Rhames but the stuntwork becomes legendary.
Edit: And Magie Q is in M:I 3 and she looks EXACTLY THE SAME as a film she was in from 2024. EXACTLY. That asian pearl cream doing the WORK!!!!![]()
MI is generally one of the most consistent long running movie series. Except 2 all of them are great.3 is my favourite, closely followed by the first one.
Mostly agree with that, except Dead Reckoning. I don't think I even finished it, seemed to resemble the Fast and Furious franchise more than MI.MI is generally one of the most consistent long running movie series. Except 2 all of them are great.