bender
What time is it?
A tale of Two (True) Grits.
I watched True Grit (2010) again and followed it up with a True Grit (1969) chaser. The Cohen brothers have made two of my favorite movies in The Big Lebowski and No Country For Old Men, but something has always felt off with their adaptation of the True Grit novel. It's said they aren't terribly familiar with the John Wayne film. It's pretty remarkable how similar yet different the movies are. A lot of the dialog mirrors one another which probably speaks to the strength of the source material and the differences come down mostly due to the performances. John Wayne's Oscar performance was said to be more of a lifetime achievement award than him being deserving with his portrayal of Rooster Cogburn and if you look a the completion that year, I'm inclined to agree. Further, I don't think John Wayne would disagree. It's also a popular notion that Jeff Bridges' performance was superior to that of his performance in Crazy Heart which notched him an Oscar which is an interesting Juxtaposition. I do prefer Jeff's rendition, but he can't hold a candle to John Wayne's delivery of "fill your hands, you son of a bitch".
I didn't care much for Kim Darby in 1969 and while I think Matt Damon feels out of place in 2010 but he's far preferable to Glen Campbell. Hailee Steinfeld is masterful but I do think the direction given to her was a bit too Wednesday Addams in how cold and ruthless she was. And maybe that's what stops me from loving this movie. No Country For Old Men left me feeling hollow but I always like to watch it again. True Grit gives me the same emotions but without wanting to go back to it.
Both adaptations are worth watching and I prefer 2010 even if I don't like it as much as most. I'm going to read the book next.
One last thing, I do really, really like Barry Pepper as Ned Pepper in 2010. He's no Robert Duval (who is?) but it's a great casting choice. Robert Duval is my favorite part of 1969.
I watched True Grit (2010) again and followed it up with a True Grit (1969) chaser. The Cohen brothers have made two of my favorite movies in The Big Lebowski and No Country For Old Men, but something has always felt off with their adaptation of the True Grit novel. It's said they aren't terribly familiar with the John Wayne film. It's pretty remarkable how similar yet different the movies are. A lot of the dialog mirrors one another which probably speaks to the strength of the source material and the differences come down mostly due to the performances. John Wayne's Oscar performance was said to be more of a lifetime achievement award than him being deserving with his portrayal of Rooster Cogburn and if you look a the completion that year, I'm inclined to agree. Further, I don't think John Wayne would disagree. It's also a popular notion that Jeff Bridges' performance was superior to that of his performance in Crazy Heart which notched him an Oscar which is an interesting Juxtaposition. I do prefer Jeff's rendition, but he can't hold a candle to John Wayne's delivery of "fill your hands, you son of a bitch".
I didn't care much for Kim Darby in 1969 and while I think Matt Damon feels out of place in 2010 but he's far preferable to Glen Campbell. Hailee Steinfeld is masterful but I do think the direction given to her was a bit too Wednesday Addams in how cold and ruthless she was. And maybe that's what stops me from loving this movie. No Country For Old Men left me feeling hollow but I always like to watch it again. True Grit gives me the same emotions but without wanting to go back to it.
Both adaptations are worth watching and I prefer 2010 even if I don't like it as much as most. I'm going to read the book next.
One last thing, I do really, really like Barry Pepper as Ned Pepper in 2010. He's no Robert Duval (who is?) but it's a great casting choice. Robert Duval is my favorite part of 1969.
Last edited: