hyperbertha
Member
Well if this thread's responses are to be considered I'm very much in the majority don't you think?You're in the minority, but you do you.
Well if this thread's responses are to be considered I'm very much in the majority don't you think?You're in the minority, but you do you.
Nope.Well if this thread's responses are to be considered I'm very much in the majority don't you think?
And GoT has a rather European setting and people are colored according to the landmass / climate they live in. Even if it’s a fictional setting. And was somehow super successful doing so.So tell me why is Bridgerton extremely sucessful if it's set on England before globalization and it has a black queen character?
Not every setting (fictional or not) has to look like America.The game is not set on Earth, hence, it’s not an “European setting”.
I have zero problem if there is gay or any race in games if thats their creative choice and I welcome that with open arms, but I get pissed when western media shit on devs when they dont put them in as they are some kind of racists or sexiest. I mean people on social media legitimately got pissed off about Bayonetta not being gay like their head canon.It's really a problem to force things in everything, because it leads to people being bothered by something they just didn't care about before.
I can see this effect on myself, I didn't mind things like gay characters or whatever else in medias before, I wasn't for or against it, I just didn't care, it's something that exists and that's it. But now that it's done for different purposes, that there's this whole woke culture, everytime I see such things in medias, I start being annoyed / questionning it, wondering if it was put there naturally, which is rarely these days, or if it's just the usual pandering.
And I know this isn't a particularly great way of thinking either, because it's being biased in a different way, but you can't help it when it's done all the time in everything constantly. They simply ruined the image / messages they were trying to defend.
You assume it is an excuse, but when it comes to Japan (or anywhere East Asia) there's a good chance they really mean it.The excuse is lame. But they're free to do whatever they want to. I said I think the question was unecessary and that IGN is fishing for controversy. You're missing the point lol
The excuse is 100% lame.
If Bridgerton can be extremely sucessful and make people don't care about "real world consistency" while not even having fantasy elements on it and being a romance story, then anything can. Unless it's specifically a historical fiction like Cleopatra or Gladiator, "real world consistency" doesn't matter. Facts.
It's such a woke American question to ask. It's just straight cringe.If there was a bunch of black characters then people would be mad that there weren't any black writers / developers on their Japanese dev team. It's always something.
A movie, TV show or game with exclusively minority characters is seen as the second coming of Christ, but something with too many white people is automatically evil, racist and wrong. It makes no sense to me. Apparently even Snow White is latina now...Tell me you didn't read what I said, without telling me you didn't read what I said...
It's lame, dude, no matter how much mental gymnastics you're trying to make lol.But what I'm saying is your line of thinking boils down to "if it's a fictional world the excuse for not being inclusive is lame... its a fictional land you can include anything you're not bound by reality"...
BUT if we apply this logic consistently and if excluding things from a fictional game world is "lame" because people have the power to include it if they wish... then OBJECTIVELY by your standard EVERYTHING imaginable should be included in the game. If a Swashbluckling Pirate with a giraffe neck isn't in FF16 then the "excuse" for not including it would be lame. By your logic they could have included it so they should... otherwise its lame.
WHAT?!?!?!
Brb, gonna put on a play about Okun Archibon and cast him as white. See how that goes down with people it doesn’t affect.A movie, TV show or game with exclusively minority characters is seen as the second coming of Christ, but something with too many white people is automatically evil, racist and wrong. It makes no sense to me. Apparently even Snow White is latina now...
I read it and wish I didn't. Latina Snow white, black Ariel, indian velma, etc. Always gets people who going who never planned on seeing these films anyway. Discussion on diversity doesn't mean we are in a worse place. Its always been bad but if you arent affected by it you just had a better ability to ignore it.
If it was a live interview and not a "email us back your answers" interview, the reply was mighty impressive. But yeah, the Q is just super cringey. Kind of hurts to read it.They should blacklist IGN. That's wasn't journalism or an interview, they put live bait in front of him and told him to bite.
Who? But don't be obtuse. If the characters race is a pivotal part of who they are then thats one thing. All the examples people tend to get upset about happen to be white...their whiteness rarely plays a role in their character.Brb, gonna put on a play about Okun Archibon and cast him as white. See how that goes down with people it doesn’t affect.
I would say that race doesn’t form a pivotal part of any folk story - but it does place them within a specific culture and time. That is why changing the race of characters rubs people up the wrong way.Who? But don't be obtuse. If the characters race is a pivotal part of who they are then thats one thing. All the examples people tend to get upset about happen to be white...their whiteness rarely plays a role in their character.
I would disagree and even on a minuscule level it does create a sense of pride for under represented groups to see themselves portrayed in a positive manner. That alone is enough reason for me to be pro representation. It hurts no one and benefits those who receive the positive aspects of it...especially when we have had historical negative representation for some groups.I would say that race doesn’t form a pivotal part of any folk story - but it does place them within a specific culture and time. That is why changing the race of characters rubs people up the wrong way.
My personal view - I don’t care. As somebody who thinks the charge of cultural appropriation is bollocks, I believe all stories belong to all peoples and cultures and I welcome adaptations of all kinds. But the modern trend of changing the races is so clearly a provocation that it really annoys me when people act offended at offence taken.
The game is not set on Earth, hence, it’s not an “European setting”.
So tell me why is Bridgerton extremely sucessful if it's set on England before globalization and it has a black queen character?
This.Big mistake. Never apologize or explain yourself to the woke crowd.
Dude fuck woke americans and their cultural colonialism. It even got to a point where plenty of teens in Poland (!) were laying on floor in public in protest of George Floyd xDIt's such a woke American question to ask. It's just straight cringe.
telling others they need to change their creations so group X is included/represented is not a long term solution.Another topic where those who have no short coming of representation will be saying "why does representation matter..." Yippie.
This.Wrong.
They don't need nor deserve any explanation. It was a loaded question.
NEVER explain to them.
Need? It’s not criminally enforced so all the daily wire non woke content is there for you consumption. Encouraged isn’t forcing anyone to do anything. All content has levels of encouragement that is culturally driven by a myriad of factors be it a demographic target or theme.telling others they need to change their creations so group X is included/represented is not a long term solution.
such an odd mix of arrogance and insecurity.
Inspired is different from actual middle east.I'd be 100% OK with them being all white European-like if it was based on mideval Europe as he said, but there's a clearly middle eastern inspired area.
"We want entertainment to be diverse... by demanding every piece of media represent the american demography."
This.
Should take notes from this guy
Fuck those retards. Outside of nonensical propaganda they aren't capable to do anyhting good.
Because the 'indentity quotas' that these people usually promote are representative of US's demographic, not the west.When your promoting your game to a largely "Western" (dunno why you hyper-focused on "american" there) audience,
They probably did. Preparing for dumb questions is, like, interview 101.you should really expect to get questions like this.
No one forced Yoko Taro put gay and intersex characters in his game, he put them because WANTS to for his story, same with George with 13 Sentinels, let devs naturally put "diverse" characters instead forcing them for sake of representation.
Try to force anything, never brings good result.
The "it's a fantasy world, you can do whatever" is a dumb excuse, that I don't agree with, and as you can see from reading this thread, neither do most posters here. Also, this isn't about representation. I'm not white, and I very much dislike how western media handles diversity/representation and would rather I not be represented at all than be represented by the bullshit they are peddling.Inspired is different from actual middle east.
Sorry but the same excuse that people tell that it is fantasy so it should be possible can and will be used in the opposite way as a valid reason. A fantasy world CAN contain one single race. Just look at any science fiction alien planet and I’m 95% sure the predominant sentient alien race is homogenous. It just become as issue when it concerns humans or earth like planets.
I’m POC as well but I don’t scream to be represented in every media. That just screams ME, ME, ME.
That’s not much of a spoiler, the game has much, MUCH bigger twists.Ouch... That was a SPOILER for me in 13 sentinels.
Bueno eh...That’s not much of a spoiler, the game has much, MUCH bigger twists.