EVERYBODY GETS SUSANOOS
YOU GET SUSANOOS
YOU GET SUSANOOS
Shisui already took that color, sorry.So funny! haha I want a Susanoo! green please
No unfortunately. Kishi designed it himself for the vidya game./notcannon
....i think?
We still don't know if Shisui's Susanoō was designed by Kishimoto because CC2 desired to give Shisui a Susanoō awakening, or if Shisui was given a Susanoō awakening because his use of it was part of the information Kishimoto provided.
... Y'know what, it doesn't matter. It could very well be canon. Before this chapter, I thought Kishimoto would stick to the trend that Itachi and Sasuke were setting by having Susanoō's rarity explained by possession of two distinct powers. But nooooo!
</bitter>
Do you have a source for this because generally manga-ka write data books themselves. Even Oda writes the books for One Piece and that's war and way the most popular series in Japan. As far as I know, Kishimoto has always written the data books himself.
What? Perfect Susanoo is a top tier jutsu. It is a fucking massive. Of course it would require a ton of chakra, and perhaps Obito is the source for powering it, and I could buy that, but I don't think anyone could reasonably believe Kakashi has the reserves to pull it off solo.
Er, yes, it does. Sharingan litrally translates to Copy Wheel Eye. How do you think Kakashi became to be know by his moniker? He copied a thousand jutsu with Obit's Sharingan?
Sasuke took a while to achieve his Perfect Susanoo because that obviously served the plot as Perfect Susanoo is a) not a common ability (not even Itachi has it, though in my mind he does cause he's Itachi), and it's ridiculously powerful. Seeing as it's crunch time to save the world, Kakashi just bust it out because he's got Ghostbito with him.
The inconsistency remains however, as Kishimoto previously wrote in data books that Amaterasu and Tsukuyomi were both necessary to awaken Susanoo, which makes sense as those three Shinto gods were all created together by Izanagi. This is a retcon plain and simple.
Kakashi didn't copy Susanoo, that's probably more than likely, however I would argue that Susanoo belongs at least as much to Obito, seeing as its his Sharingan born from his chakra and that he seemed to fully aware what the results would be and that it would expire, i.e. once Ghostbito leaves, does the Susanoo.
It's the Uchiha's chakra that's responsible for changing the eye like that. Obito was linked to his left eye in close proximity—he could see through it. Since he was experiencing such a situation just before he arrived on that scene, it's safe to assume that it was because of this link that the left eye he gave to Kakashi also turned into a Mangekyō Sharingan in that same instance.I'm surprised Kakashi awaken the MS since Uchiha's are the ones that go crazy with loss, that means Kakashi losing rin impact him as much as it did to Obito.
Right on.And the matter about killing your "best friend" is still technically true, it's the method several other Uchiha used to awaken the Mangekyō Sharingan since Madara's heyday, because that was the quickest, surefire way for the power-hungry jerks. Thing is, many readers already suspected that it was the feeling of loss that attributed to that change, because they had to witness the death of those closest to them, and because of the way we had already seen the Sharingan's advancement being so dependent upon the user's emotions.
A lot of people thought Sasuke was going to walk away from the Valley of the End with a Mangekyō Sharingan, thinking that he had successfully killed Naruto... Before it was revealed that he spared Naruto, and declared his intent to surpass Itachi in his own way(that went so well, by the way. ). There were even a bunch of fake spoilers about it.
Naruto fake pic
If I didn't right click and use the "search google for this image" option I would've sworn that this was an official thing. Jesus that guy's talented.
That's some really good fanart.
Means exactly what it says, Susanoō's Databook entry was based around Itachi's specific example of the technique. Sasuke didn't meet those exact same prerequisites, not all Susanoō have been materialized with the exact same armament.
If you are getting the impression that I'm trying to discredit the Databooks, or imply that they aren't canon, then that isn't the case; I don't even buy the claims that have been going around that Kishimoto's assistants alone are responsible for the Databooks' writing.
As you said, they are there to clarify subjects, extrapolate things that were otherwise left vague, or omitted entirely; but when new, or conflicting information is provided by the manga, it will supersede what was provided in the outdated information in the Databooks. That is why they are meant to be taken within the context of the chapters they cover.
Alright, let me explain: How can any sort of databook, both in real life and in fiction, take things into account that have not happened yet? Simple answer: It can't. As real life and the manga go on, new things come up and new information retcons old one. This is a completely normal process. Here we have an old statement from a databook, were only one character was in possession of the subject at hand (Susanoo). Since then, multiple new users of said subject came along. You guys want to apply the old statement (from a time were it could be applied to only one character) to the new users as well, despite new information about that subject. That is plain wrong. The databooks are only correct for the chapters they're covering. Every subject after that can only be explained by a databook statement if there was no new information about that subject.
And the same usually holds true for other similar supplemental reading for manga 'n such that were created to summarize prior events. The only one I know of that hasn't presented this kind of issue has been Dragon Ball's Daizenshū, and that's probably only due to the fact that they were done after the manga's conclusion.
Ironically, I checked the Japanese original of the databook text and I think there's some room for interpretation. The sentence in question doesn't mention the word "jutsu". It only says
The power of a wild god, dwelling only in those who seized/grasped/held both... that is "Susanoo".
The only problem is that the word both can refer to either the techniques or both eyes... however, the only other statement is Sasuke's, which is pretty clear.[/url]
As I mentioned before, not all Susanoō ended up as "sword and shield bearing aragami" either.
Early fan translations have also been known to be quite misleading, with liberties taken, and the original meaning lost . Take, for example, the entry for Kakashi's Kamui: it lead a bunch of forum-goers that had nothing but these hastily done translations to work with believing that Kamui could be invoked by anyone with a Mangekyō Sharingan through constant development of one's chakra, when all that statement did was describe what Kakashi was doing when we first saw him use it in Part 2: gathering chakra in preparation of it.
There are still a quite a few who still believe that to this day... Just like there are still many who are still under the impression that Itachi gave all of his Mangekyō Sharingan techniques to Sasuke; you seemed to be one of them.
But you can't scream "retcon" everytime the author unveils a new plot twist. Fiction is built almost entirely around suspense and misdirection.
Itachi explains Susanoo as a third power that awakened when he activated Tsukuyomi and Amaterasu. There are several ways to interpret that. Just because your interpretation was wrong doesn't make Kishi a hack that can't keep his own story straight.
If I didn't right click and use the "search google for this image" option I would've sworn that this was an official thing. Jesus that guy's talented.
Your welcome. (✌゚∀゚HOLY SHIT. I've never noticed that option before.
Thanks for changing my life.
Aside from common sense (not the author's job), there would be the book themselves (the text makes it rather clear Kishimoto isn't the one writing).Do you have an actual source aside from a link to a Japanese website I can't read?
Because he's the author of the series.Kishimoto is accredited as the author of every data book thus far afaik.
I believe it's not uncommon for editors/publishers to come up with some stuff of their own. As long as the author doesn't say anything against it...All information in those books come from him as he is the only that actually knows everything.
Aside from common sense (not the author's job), there would be the book themselves (the text makes it rather clear Kishimoto isn't the one writing).
Because he's the author of the series.
I believe it's not uncommon for editors/publishers to come up with some stuff of their own. As long as the author doesn't say anything against it...
The Naruto [Secret: Scroll of Facing] Character Official Databook (NARUTO-ナルト-[秘伝・臨の書]キャラクターオフィシャルデータBOOK, NARUTO [Hiden: Rin no Sho] Kyarakutā Ofisharu DētaBOOK) is the first of the supplementary guidebooks on the Naruto series authored by Masashi Kishimoto. It is the first of three databooks and covers the chapters 1 to 120.
The Naruto [Secret: Scroll of Fighting] Character Official Databook (NARUTO-ナルト-[秘伝・闘の書]キャラクターオフィシャルデータBOOK, NARUTO [Hiden: Tō no Sho] Kyarakutā Ofisharu DētaBOOK) is the third of the supplementary guidebooks on the Naruto series authored by Masashi Kishimoto. It is the second of three databooks.
The Naruto [Secret: Scroll of People] Character Official Databook (NARUTO-ナルト-[秘伝・者の書]キャラクターオフィシャルデータBOOK, NARUTO [Hiden: Sha no Sho] Kyarakutā Ofisharu DētaBOOK) is the fourth of the supplementary guidebooks on the Naruto series authored by Masashi Kishimoto. It is the third of three databooks.
You're just restating your initial position, there, nothing more.Common sense is not on your side. Manga-ka produce external reading material all the time. Kishimoto does, Oda does it, and countless other manga-ka do it.
He didn't.If Kishimoto didn't write those books
And as it happens, he's not listed as the one who actually wrote the book, but as the original author:he wouldn't be listed as the author. He would be given credit, sure, but not listed as the one who wrote it.
Well, that's bullshit, sorry. The books make it really clear which parts are actually written by Kishimoto, and it's a tiny portion (stuff like comments regarding the character designs or interviews).The translators on the Naruto wikai that translated the pages confirmed everything is written and supplied by Kishimoto.
Okay, so I stopped reading the manga around the time all the Hokage / leaders were meeting up and I believe Sasuke and his team showed up or wanted to show up to kill them all I think. I'm pretty sure the leaders were meeting to discuss a war. So, question for all of you... is this the same war going on or has there been multiple arcs since then? I've randomly read a chapter here and there over the years just to see how crazy it's gotten but I was never sure without jumping back in.
Okay, so I stopped reading the manga around the time all the Hokage / leaders were meeting up and I believe Sasuke and his team showed up or wanted to show up to kill them all I think. I'm pretty sure the leaders were meeting to discuss a war. So, question for all of you... is this the same war going on or has there been multiple arcs since then? I've randomly read a chapter here and there over the years just to see how crazy it's gotten but I was never sure without jumping back in.
You're just restating your initial position, there, nothing more.
He didn't.
And as it happens, he's not listed as the one who actually wrote the book, but as the original author:
Well, that's bullshit, sorry. The books make it really clear which parts are actually written by Kishimoto, and it's a tiny portion (stuff like comments regarding the character designs or interviews).
Okay, so I stopped reading the manga around the time all the Hokage / leaders were meeting up and I believe Sasuke and his team showed up or wanted to show up to kill them all I think. I'm pretty sure the leaders were meeting to discuss a war. So, question for all of you... is this the same war going on or has there been multiple arcs since then? I've randomly read a chapter here and there over the years just to see how crazy it's gotten but I was never sure without jumping back in.
Edit: Come on Frog-Fu those data books are outdated as hell.
Same war. The manga chapter that marked the start of the war officially came out in November 2010Okay, so I stopped reading the manga around the time all the Hokage / leaders were meeting up and I believe Sasuke and his team showed up or wanted to show up to kill them all I think. I'm pretty sure the leaders were meeting to discuss a war. So, question for all of you... is this the same war going on or has there been multiple arcs since then? I've randomly read a chapter here and there over the years just to see how crazy it's gotten but I was never sure without jumping back in.
I know they are, but how is that relevant to who wrote them?
They are so outdated they might as well be created by a different person.
Because he doesn't.You claim that Kishi doesn't write the data books for his own manga
It's Shûeisha's own site, and it doesn't only list Kishimoto: it credits him as the original writer, and the actual book to Caramel Mama.give me a link to some obscure site that only lists his name
Like I told you, they're all people from Caramel Mama. The actual names are all listed at the end of each guidebook.you don't actually have a name for the supposed author(s) of the books?
You sound like a broken record, at this point... He's credited because he's the original writer. That's all there is to it.You just call bullshit on it being Kishimoto despite his name being listed as the author?
Just to clarify: I'm merely saying that those guidebooks aren't actually written by the original authors. Obviously, those authors have some amount of input (for the interviews and direct quotes, at the very least) and approved the thing (which, admittedly, may or may not mean much, depending on the author). They still are official guidebooks.the databooks hardly qualify as "filler" material just because he himself didn't pen them, like I (think) I'm seeing suggested.
Because he doesn't.
Right now, I can't think of any manga artist who does, actually... Maybe Shirô Masamune? I'd have to check...
It's Shûeisha's own site, and it doesn't only list Kishimoto: it credits him as the original writer, and the actual book to Caramel Mama.
Like I told you, they're all people from Caramel Mama. The actual names are all listed at the end of each guidebook.
You sound like a broken record, at this point... He's credited because he's the original writer. That's all there is to it.
Again, common sense: he's a manga artist, not a guidebook writer. You can't seriously expect his publisher to want him spending time on that when other people can do the job and simply ask for his approval after the fact. That's how those things are done.
As with most (all?) Shûeisha guidebooks, Caramel Mama did most of the writing. And again, you don't even need to read the credits on the last page to tell: the books regularly reference "Kishimoto Sensei" or "Sensei" in the third person and make it very clear when they have comments and quotes "from the Man Himself". Kishimoto even thanked the Caramel Mama people at the end of the first guidebook.
Now, you wouldn't be the first one to be mistaken about this: I regularly see Western readers argue guidebooks are written by the original authors. I guess not being able to read Japanese can't help, and since it often is about Weekly Jump series, we're generally talking about young readers, which probably explains a lot as well...
I've seen a lot of similar discussions regarding the Dragon Ball Daizenshû, for example, despite the fact those very books have Toriyama stating in no uncertain terms that he didn't write them. There again: Caramel Mama.
So pleasant...At this point you're just being a nuisance.
Yes, the people you've asked (I imagine I'm not included though), and you mentioned a wiki earlier (wiki are only as reliable as their most recent or stubborn editors).You say Kishimoto isn't the author. Everyone I've asked and every source I've read says he is.
I already did. It's hardly my fault if you choose to ignore it (or call shueisha.co.jp "some obscure site").Here's a novel idea, produce a fucking source for your assertions