What does the KAT replacing Anthony Davis comment mean? Very confused since they are not on the same team. And how are either of them relevant to the Celtics and the Brooklyn picks?
The Duncan comparison is ridiculous because the player the Celtics are going to be drafting is going to be 19 years old and extremely raw. Duncan was a 4 year college player, came into the league as a 21 year old, and as a rookie was a top 10 player in the league. Fultz or Ball are not going to be superstars right away, and aren't even for sure stars. Everyone knew Duncan was going to be great immediately.
And the Celtics squad is relatively young, and Isiah likely has more years of his prime, and Jaylen Brown is also a rookie that will develop, sorta similar with Rozier, etc.
The best window for the Celtics? In the transition between the current contenders and the newer, younger teams (like the Bucks, Timberwolves, etc.), where the Celtics both have those young pieces, but also have the sort of personnel to pull a 2012 Heat Finals on those younger teams, but is younger and more athletic and can win against the older, aging teams. The Celtics picks give this possibility a very real probability of occurring, imo
If you look at the teams that give the Warriors some trouble, they're all young, athletic, and a little too young. The Celtics would be the most experienced of it, and adding to that advantage while also letting the Warriors do what they do, is a decent idea.
The main idea is that they go forward with a clear vision or clear ideas of where to go. That's what make terrible FOs terrible, they don't know what the fuck they want and how to get there.