That Italian team wasn't THAT good. They happened to be unconscious on their 3's, but then again, they were getting tons of wide-open looks on good ball movement, so that's props to them and a hit on the US defense. If you'll notice, the Italian team was making 4-6 passes every possession-- how many was team USA making? Maybe 3, tops. The US game is all about isolations and flash. The US defensive rotations broke down after the third or fourth pass by the Italians, and that consistently got them free beyond the arc.
And I'd hardly say that int'l competition is "ten times better" than they were in '92. Hell, my father can play better team ball than team USA did the other day, and he's 51 years old. If you're going to say that the int'l competition is "ten times better" nowadays, but admit that the '92 US team would still win handily today, then you're basically saying that that team was "ten times better" than this year's team, or that the absence of marquee players such as Kobe, Kidd, and Shaq really makes this year's team "ten times worse" than it could have been. While I'll admit that they would have had a tremendous effect, I don't think there's a 10-fold increase in quality just by having those players.
Those Italians were slow, unmuscular, and couldn't jump to save themselves, yet they DESTROYED the US team. Bionic, you're
absolutely insane if you think that today's int'l players are "100 times better" than they were in '92. Are they better today? Sure. 100 times better? Yeah, ok...
Stop making excuses for today's spoiled, selfish, and unskilled players. Nobody gives a shit how many dunks or highlights they have if they only come home with the bronze, right? Typical US mindset. They're just not good
skilled players by and large. So you just keep making excuses while everyone else with eyes laughs at our performance.
Also, you're talking out of two sides of your mouth (i.e., being duplicitous), but I doubt you see it:
You have said many times in the past that today's players are "better" because of their increased athleticism/size etc. Yet you now say that the int'l competition is "100 times better" than it used to be-- but not due to increased athleticism or size (after all, I'm more athletic than any 3 players combined from Italy's team, and they were all undersized, at least musculature-wise), but rather (presumably) because of more refined basketball
skills. Yet I submit that if the skill of playing basketball is evolving, in terms of fundamentals, outside shooting, running solid plays etc. that it should hold for ALL sides-- not just the int'l players. Why haven't our players evolved their "skills" in the last decade to match the development of these other nations? Because, truly, assuming anywhere NEAR equal skills and teamwork, the more athletic team should win handily EVERY time. Funny how these teams have evolved
skill-wise, and as
teams, yet our supposedly "superior" players nowadays can't hang. Excuses are just that-- excuses.
Lame.
Yet team USA has failed miserably and, I would imagine, will continue to have dismal showings, even when they prevail.