This is grid. A bit hard to see I’m the pic, but it’s a bunch of lines ther intersect and make little squares like a grid pattern.
That's just moiré effect when taking a picture ?
No it’s grid and it’s there but if you want to learn more just check out Avs forums.
Europe. The guy came to me with new panel to replace
First time I hear that. That's amazing.
I tried both and can't see difference but I only changed it in nvidia and tv being on auto, adjusted.
I have an older C6 and leave it on automatic and high on my TV.
Best photos of grid I've seen so far are below. It's usually faint or even imperceptible on still images but can get really bad in motion, especially on very bright objects like sun. It doesn't really get better, had 6 panels so far, ran each of them for above 50 hours taking breaks in between for automatic refreshes and if it's bad, it stays bad. Vertical banding and other near-black non-uniformities definitely improves, especially after first refresh, but not the grid which is only visible on bright colors. Only one of those 6 panels had grid so faint that it didn't bother me in games but I didn't want to keep the TV (that was Panasonic HZ980) so now I'm on a quest to find another clean panel without this piece of sh*t effect.
Full. Just make sure tv is set to full as well.
Coincidentally I was playing uncharted 3 at the desert walk part and it showed the grid on c1 very obviously lol. So yeah anything in the desert like journey works greatBest photos of grid I've seen so far are below. It's usually faint or even imperceptible on still images but can get really bad in motion, especially on very bright objects like sun. It doesn't really get better, had 6 panels so far, ran each of them for above 50 hours taking breaks in between for automatic refreshes and if it's bad, it stays bad. Vertical banding and other near-black non-uniformities definitely improves, especially after first refresh, but not the grid which is only visible on bright colors. Only one of those 6 panels had grid so faint that it didn't bother me in games but I didn't want to keep the TV (that was Panasonic HZ980) so now I'm on a quest to find another clean panel without this piece of sh*t effect.
Grid wasn't a thing on panels made before 2020. LG changed something in manufacturing process. Seems to align in time with new Guangzhou plant going live.
Best game to test for this is Journey.
Just drop everything and go play Uncharted 4 in HDR. holy balls.guys i finally bought my 55" C1any suggestions or configurations to do? mostly to play on my ps5.
Also play God of War with the PS5 patch. Looks amazing!guys i finally bought my 55" C1
Just buy 48-55" and cut the resolution to 1600p with black bars
This is going to be a lot cheaper than buying actual ultrawide OLED monitor (if it even appears anytime soon).
Next year *might* have a Sony mini led set which would be a huge jump for led, and samsung will have qd oled. If you can wait I would wait at least for CES in January to see what will come out.
Also came from a Panasonic plasma. I tried 2 LED, KS8000 and a Vizio I dont remember much about, before landing on OLED, Took me awhile simply because I was being cheap and didn't want to drop that much on a TV. After having a Plasma for years I just couldn't stand the way an LED looks. I probably could have adjusted to it over time, but I never would have been happy.
Have not been hearing great things about QD-OLED, but maybe I'll be proven wrong once Samsung shows it off. The truth is Samsung never wanted to bring QD-OLED to market. Internal testing have shown it to simply be not able to reach the same level of brightness as LG OLEDs (at least that's what the word going around is). Samsung is only purchasing QD-OLED panels from their sister company (Samsung Display) in a deal for them to produce some parts for their (Samsung Electronics) micro-LED tech. At this point it's looking like QD-OLED is being treated as nothing more than a stopgap tech. It will be interesting to see what happens at CES though. I'm personally leaning more toward Samsung Display's other tech, QNED (quantum nano emitting diode), being the next big thing.
6-10 hour daily use = ~1 year lifetime
Early adopters
ive used a number of pioneer plasmas as monitors, and all of them experienced temporary burn-in (never permanent).
6-10 hour daily use = ~1 year lifetime
Early adopters
i should clarify... all were used primarily as a monitor, but were also used a lot for gaming, movies, and tv.
The thing with qd oled brightness is that it won't be an issue in SDR, certainly not in a dark room. Second it's supposed to appear brighter than lg oled in hdr due to the higher color gamut. On paper at least, and add to that no near black flashing because there's no white sub pixel ; qd oled is superior.
I was going to say i'm basing the plasma being a bit more resistant to burn in based on others experience i've read alone. Seems like a lot of plasmas last years and years, but I really doubt your CX will last 6 years tbh. And LG knows you'll probably upgrade before then.
www.nature.com
I ended up with a 77 when I was looking at 65s because I thought 77 would be stupid big. Its large for sure, but I sort of forgot just how elegant modern TV design has become. It fits nicely.
It's absolutely not a non issue. The newer models are better, but they're also newer, which is why you see less about them and burn-in that the older models. All the pixel shift, dimming, and refreshers in the world won't change the fact that burn-in is just inevitable. It's not a matter of if, but when. I mean, that Linus video is on a year old brand new panel. I'll also point out that a lot of people who have gotten burn-in don't actually realize they've gotten it. I know a bunch of people who would never have noticed the burn-in Linus has, they're just oblivious. I also personally know people who have claimed they've never gotten it, but you run color slides on their set and they absolutely do. It's just a limitation of the tech and a trade off you have to deal with, just like with Plasmas back in the day.
Who says the Switch won't need it? I guarantee you that we'll be seeing images of Switches with burn in this time next year or the next. And phones burn in all the time, people just replace them constantly.
Sure, I get that. But let's be real here - I'll likely be using this TV for less than 4 hours a day. It'll likely get replaced with a nicer set in 5-6 years anyway regardless of burn in. I don't watch news channels or things that have the same screen elements in the same place all the time (the closest thing I'll get to that will be playing games where HUD elements might be in the same place a lot, but I don't play anything like Destiny 2 or live service games so the game I'm playing will change, often). So most likely, I'll have less than 10,000 hours on the screen by the time I'd naturally replace it anyway.
Burn in is NOT inevitable unless you watch the same content with static images on a regular basis. I never recommend using an OLED as a monitor, but someone who uses it for movies and games is not remotely guaranteed to get burn-in.
Likely from LCD peeps trying to downplay oleds objective superiority.
Oh, absolutely. Usage matters, you'll probably be just fine with that type of usage.
No, it's 100% inevitable. You can't change the tech. The ONLY difference is the way you use it, and for how long. Eventually EVERY single OLED panel will get burn-in. Most people will be lucky and replace the panel before it happens or they notice, but given enough time and usage it's going to happen.
Great, one whole year!
Or, ya know, we are people who understand the technology, and it's limitations, and aren't comfortable with people pretending these issues don't exist so we can cheerlead an inanimate device? I'm literally typing this from an LG C1, but yeah I'm an LCD peep, whatever the fuck that is...lol.
. Anyway feed back would be appreciated.