Looks like a bad night of eating Taco Bell in a toilet bowl.
Looking at the green parts, it came from both ends.
Looks like a bad night of eating Taco Bell in a toilet bowl.
Actually I think the map will end up looking something like this. I know the GTAForums are like 90% kids, but there are really good people there, too.
Here is a version in 3D they did:
Actually I think the map will end up looking something like this. I know the GTAForums are like 90% kids, but there are really good people there, too.
Here is a version in 3D they did:
Edit: Lots of space for small towns/villages we have not seen yet..
The character said one thing and did another. Sounds like a regular person, not narrative dissonance.
Have all GTA games always taken place on islands? This looks a lot like a Hawaiian island.
Have all GTA games always taken place on islands?
Honestly, my BIGGEST and most favourite addition to GTA so far is wildlife and really hope they are implemented as well as RDR ( probably not)
Actually I think the map will end up looking something like this. I know the GTAForums are like 90% kids, but there are really good people there, too.
Here is a version in 3D they did:
The first trailer showed a couple climbing a mountain.
Oh yes. Mountain biking for the win, followed by a parachute jump.
Multiple. Mt. Chiliad as in the PS2 game, but other large ones as well. Can't remember the name of the one CVG saw in their preview, but they specifically mentioned bike trails and seeing a park ranger driving up a road on the side of the mountain so you'll definitely be able to reach the top.Will be there a mountain in the game I wonder? Hang gliding of that would be awesome.
I really hope you can choose your motorcycle helmet in V.
I got off my bike multiple times in IV just to change it to all black.
Screens look good. Glad binoculars are in!
I think Watch Dogs' looks ugly, infact.think someone pointed this out awhile ago - but that description sounds like the map in Watch Dogs
and i read it somewhere, forgot if it's the previews, that when you are walking it's still top down view. only when you are driving it looks like the one described above.
Weird, doesn't sound like him to me.
Weird, doesn't sound like him to me.
Really? I thought the "Why do I have to hold your hand through all this midlife crisis bullshit" line sounded just like him.
Really? I thought the "Why do I have to hold your hand through all this midlife crisis bullshit" line sounded just like him.
Actually I think the map will end up looking something like this. I know the GTAForums are like 90% kids, but there are really good people there, too.
Here is a version in 3D they did:
Edit: Lots of space for small towns/villages we have not seen yet..
Those long roads.....Be still, my beating heart.
I'd be more than happy with a map that looks similar to this.
Haven't really paid any attention to this game until now, but there's presumably only one island? That's a little disappointing, no? I always liked the three island structure that they had. Especially in San Andreas, where every island felt rather different.
Haven't really paid any attention to this game until now, but there's presumably only one island? That's a little disappointing, no? I always liked the three island structure that they had. Especially in San Andreas, where every island felt rather different.
link?No one knows for certain yet, but all points lead to a single massive island. According to R*, they only revealed like 1/8 of the entire world.
More than the long roads themselves, what gets me is the mountains always in the distance.
Assuming the game is not landlocked (it's being described as an island) it means all those are actually explorable, and there's stuff beyond.
(screens from the mapping thread on GTAForums)
Eh, Venturas didn't really feel that unique to me.. Especially in San Andreas, where every island felt rather different.
I hope we get some snow. I want to use a ski-mobile.
You can enter in some interiors, allegedly more than before.And yet we still can't go inside the buildings.
The game is coming out on ps3 and 360 only, as of now.Sorry if this question has been asked before, but these screens are from next gen consoles, right?
So true.Going to San Fierro the first time was cool and all, but Los Santos always felt WAY more detailed than Fierro or Venturas.
The game is coming out on ps3 and 360 only, as of now.
These screens are, allegedly, coming from those versions, allthough they may have been touched up.
No one knows for certain yet, but all points lead to a single massive island. According to R*, they only revealed like 1/8 of the entire world.
I'd like to see the source myself.link?
Of course not but maybe more than 1 apartment building with 1 floor with none of the doors enter able besides yours?Do you really want 200 detailed floors with nothing worthwhile to do in them?
.
And yet we still can't go inside the buildings.
Was Samuel L. Jackson not well known when San Andreas came out?what is this jonah hill bs, i respected rockstars stance on no known actors... it is too distracting.
i doubt it's true, someone just saw the resemblence and said sure, whatever.
would be dissapointing if it is hill.
:lol I've always thought to myself all of that city with only a few open doors was silly. RDR was better than GTA IV in that regard, but only because it was in a developing world with far fewer buildings. I understand that tons of buildings with lame interiors don't make for a better gaming experience, but it's just one of those small things that take me out of the immersion. I'm hoping to see more explorable interiors, but I don't expect every single building to accommodate me. Skyrim can scratch my itch when it comes to this little detail.
So how big is Los Santos? I'm a little bummed that it's just one city, but if it's massive, then it shouldn't be too bad.
So how big is Los Santos? I'm a little bummed that it's just one city, but if it's massive, then it shouldn't be too bad.