Jessie.Bristol
Member
Like others said, that isn't AI. That is an actual human player, even says it in the video description.
Gamez is srs biznessssssssIs it me or is this gen all about watching previews and being "concerned'?
I believe it was a joke.Like others said, that isn't AI. That is an actual human player, even says it in the video description.
More at http://teambeyond.net/new-halo-5-guardians-raid-on-apex-7-screenshots/
Nice. Any gameplay?Some screens from Apex 7 Warzone
More at http://teambeyond.net/new-halo-5-guardians-raid-on-apex-7-screenshots/
Is it me or is this gen all about watching previews and being "concerned'?
Nice. Any gameplay?
I disagree completely on the notion that 30FPS probably wouldn't be 30FPS if they went full on visuals. Not sure what the fate of split screen would be if the game was 30FPS, though.
That said, 343, jack up the difficulty.
Especially since Bungie created some of the best of all time on consoles.
In the campaign, probably not. That's my hunch, anyway.Are you saying if they went 30fps it probably wouldn't be locked because of the focus on visuals?
AI is a big deal, next only to gameplay mechanics and story for the Halo campaigns. (Followed swiftly by level design). All four factors make up the golden square of replayability.
This is why previewing is a double edged sword. You have to lock down a build for preview, but it still may have some bugs. Fixing them may introduce new ones that break the game in bigger ways, so you go with the last "stable" build, and let some press people play it. It ticks all the right checkboxes but has some gitches, and the enthusiast fans see it and get worried. MS is on an aggressive PR swing with Xbox and Halo, so they need to show things earlier and generate hype. That must be driving 343 crazy when they know there are builds being shown that have bugs.
I'll be worried when the game is out and people start to report these problems. Halo 4 had great AI, and I don't see this game suddenly being worse. That would be a huge failure... at release.
See, the problem is thatHalo 4 had great AI, and I don't see this game suddenly being worse. That would be a huge failure... at release.
This is why previewing is a double edged sword. You have to lock down a build for preview, but it still may have some bugs. Fixing them may introduce new ones that break the game in bigger ways, so you go with the last "stable" build, and let some press people play it. It ticks all the right checkboxes but has some gitches, and the enthusiast fans see it and get worried. MS is on an aggressive PR swing with Xbox and Halo, so they need to show things earlier and generate hype. That must be driving 343 crazy when they know there are builds being shown that have bugs.
I'll be worried when the game is out and people start to report these problems. Halo 4 had great AI, and I don't see this game suddenly being worse. That would be a huge failure... at release.
I am not a big Halo fan but this game looks amazing.
Halo 4 had terrible AI. I don't know what game you played.
Halo 4 Heroic was a breeze when tackled solo. Legendary was damn near impossible in the last few levels (fuck you, Knights!) I'd love to see H5 Heroic more difficult, Legendary less.Agreed, if difficulty is still tinkered with at the end of the development cycle like Frankie said, then it needs to go up. Heroic looks like Halo 4 normal, and Halo 4 wasn't even that hard, tbh.
Terrible? I was playing on Heroic on my own and it definitely was a nice challenge. Far...faaaaar from terrible. Probably not as good as the older games, but terrible is just ridiculous man, come on.
That Kraken looks amazing, but it's not at the level of interactivity as a Scrarab - but the scale is mindblowing.
Terrible? I was playing on Heroic on my own and it definitely was a nice challenge. Far...faaaaar from terrible. Probably not as good as the older games, but terrible is just ridiculous man, come on.
I asked Arthur on twitter. Blue Team was on Heroic and he cut out a lot of deaths. Team Osiris was Normal i guess because he was on a timetable. Check his twitter.
Huh. I feel the opposite way. The inside is like a small level on its own, and there are multiple ways to attack the outside parts. And it hassles you throughout the level before you fight it properly.
I had elites not even engage and Prometheans get stuck in corner just from me trying to flank them all on Legendary. I never had anything like that happen in any other Halo game that I can remember. If you were playing co-op it was even more of a joke.
He say anything about the Ai?
Some screens from Apex 7 Warzone
More at http://teambeyond.net/new-halo-5-guardians-raid-on-apex-7-screenshots/
Some screens from Apex 7 Warzone
More at http://teambeyond.net/new-halo-5-guardians-raid-on-apex-7-screenshots/
Yikes, that looks awful.
What? What looks awful about it? Looks pretty nice to me!
Yeah same here. I like it. Are we all looking at the same screenshots?
gotta get that 60fpsI think he meant this screenshot in particular.
I have to agree that it looks a bit rough.
What? What looks awful about it? Looks pretty nice to me!
Sheesh, Halo has got to be the most scrutinized franchise in the history of gaming...
My favorite sentiments from this marketing campaign are:
1) Team Osiris' intro didn't show tactical Spartan-like behavior, meanwhile Blue Team's intro was to methodical
2) 343i is shitting all over Bungie conventions that should be held as gospel... Though many of these design choices were intiated by Bungie in-game or consistent with Bungie sanctioned lore
3) 343i has made too many changes to the formula, meanwhile the formula looks too familiar...
Anyway, I think the footage looks great. I can't wait for a legendary playthrough...
Yea those textures are a bit poor, but "awful" is not the right word to me. That looks awesome for a multiplayer map.
Is the Chief's hands shaking in the Blue Team intro?
Looks like lighting/shadows artifacts. Would be a great character trait, though.
Yikes, that looks awful.
Halo on the internet, bro. It started in early 2002 with "Overrated" forum posts and hasn't stopped. Nothing you can do, just go with the flow.
Ah yeah, okay I see it.
The right part of that image is indeed a bit all over the place!
Are 'awful' and 'terrible' and so on and so on really the right words to use? Really?
I don't care about negative opinions, I do care about them being expressed in such hyperbolic ways.